scholarly journals The Role of Consolidative Radiotherapy after a Complete Response to Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the Rituximab Era: Results from a Systematic Review with a Meta-Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 134 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunhong Hu ◽  
Chao Deng ◽  
Wen Zou ◽  
Guangsen Zhang ◽  
Jingjing Wang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy ◽  
Large B Cell

Background: The current standard therapy for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (RCHOP). The role of radiotherapy (RT) after complete response (CR) to RCHOP in patients with DLBCL remains unclear. This systematic review with a meta-analysis is an attempt to evaluate this role. Methods: Studies that evaluated RT versus no-RT after CR to RCHOP for DLBCL patients were searched in databases. Hazard ratios (HR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: A total of 4 qualified retrospective studies (633 patients) were included in this review. The results suggested that RT improved overall survival (OS; HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.77) and progression-free/event-free survival (PFS/EFS; HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.11-0.50) in all patients compared with no-RT. In a subgroup analysis of patients with stage III-IV DLBCL, RT improved PFS/EFS (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.51) and local control (HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.03-0.44), with a trend of improving OS (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.12-1.05). Conclusion: Consolidation RT could significantly improve outcomes of DLBCL patients who achieved a CR to RCHOP. However, the significance of these results was limited by these retrospective data. Further investigation of the role of consolidation RT in the rituximab era is needed.

The role of maintenance therapy in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alon Rozental ◽  
Anat Gafter‐Gvili ◽  
Liat Vidal ◽  
Pia Raanani ◽  
Ronit Gurion
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

Prognostic significance of CD30 expression in diffuse large B cell lymphoma: A systematic review with meta‐analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Isabelly Rodrigues‐Fernandes ◽  
Lucas Guimarães Abreu ◽  
Raghu Radhakrishnan ◽  
Danyel Elias da Cruz Perez ◽  
Gleyson Kleber Amaral‐Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

Comparison of salvage therapies for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): Network meta-analysis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19037-e19037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Venkata Vosuri ◽  
Ravi Kaisreddy ◽  
Somasekhar Bandi
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Large B Cell

e19037 Background: Salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation(ASCT) is the standard second-line treatment for relapsed or refractory diffuse large b-cell lymphoma(DLBCL). Rituximab plus ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide(R-ICE) and rituximab plus dexamethasone, high dose cytarabine, cisplatin(R-DHAP) are the two widely used regimens worldwide but quest for optimal regimen continues. Our objective is to compare currently available salvage therapies based on complete response and adverse events. Methods: Pubmed, EMBASE and Clinicaltrials.gov were queried for salvage therapies in relapsed or refractory DLBCL. Only randomized clinical trials including phase 2 and 3 trials involving salvage therapies for relapsed or refractory DLBCL were selected. Data was extracted based on meta-analysis guidelines by two independent reviewers. Network meta-analyses of treatment effects and adverse outcomes were calculated with a frequentist approach. Results: Overall, 5 studies(1480 patients) were included. The salvage therapies investigated were rituximab plus ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide(R-ICE), rituximab plus dexamethasone, high dose cytarabine, cisplatin(R-DHAP), rituximab plus gemcitabine, dexamethasone, cisplatin(R-GDP), ofatumumab plus dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin(O-DHAP), ifosfamide plus ofatumunab, carboplatin, and etoposide(O-ICE), dacetuzumab plus rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide(DR-ICE). Of the 6 regimens in the network, treatment with R-DHAP (OR:0.36,95%CI:0.24-0.54), R-GDP(OR:0.37,95%CI: 0.21-0.65), O-ICE(OR:0.16,95%CI: 0.05-0.53), O-DHAP(OR:0.30,95%CI:0.17-0.52), DR-ICE(OR:0.77,95%CI:0.40-1.49) were not superior against network placebo(R-ICE) in achieving complete response. Higher odds of occurring severe adverse events was observed in R-DHAP(OR:2.02,95%CI: 1.35-3.01) and O-DHAP(OR:2.15,95%CI: 1.24-3.72) salvage regimens when compared to R-ICE. Conclusions: R-DHAP, R-GDP, O-ICE and O-DHAP were found to have no difference in treatment effect in achieving complete response in comparison to R-ICE. R-DHAP and O-DHAP are associated with higher number of severe adverse events in comparison with R-ICE. Outcomes mentioned above should be interpreted in the context of drugs and other factors involved in the disease.

scholarly journals Systematic Review of the Potential of MicroRNAs in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ane Larrabeiti-Etxebarria ◽  
Maria Lopez-Santillan ◽  
Borja Santos-Zorrozua ◽  
Elixabet Lopez-Lopez ◽  
Africa Garcia-Orad
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Extracellular Vesicle ◽  
Human Patient ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of invasive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). DLBCL presents with variable backgrounds, which results in heterogeneous outcomes among patients. Although new tools have been developed for the classification and management of patients, 40% of them still have primary refractory disease or relapse. In addition, multiple factors regarding the pathogenesis of this disease remain unclear and identification of novel biomarkers is needed. In this context, recent investigations point to microRNAs as useful biomarkers in cancer. The aim of this systematic review was to provide new insight into the role of miRNAs in the diagnosis, classification, treatment response and prognosis of DLBCL patients. We used the following terms in PubMed” ((‘Non-coding RNA’) OR (‘microRNA’ OR ‘miRNA’ OR ‘miR’) OR (‘exosome’) OR (‘extracellular vesicle’) OR (‘secretome’)) AND (‘Diffuse large B cell lymphoma’ OR ‘DLBCL’)” to search for studies evaluating miRNAs as a diagnosis, subtype, treatment response or prognosis biomarkers in primary DLBCL in human patient populations. As a result, the analysis was restricted to the role of miRNAs in tumor tissue and we did not consider circulating miRNAs. A total of thirty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. Among them, twenty-one were classified in the diagnosis category, twenty in classification, five in treatment response and nineteen in prognosis. In this review, we have identified miR-155-5p and miR-21-5p as miRNAs of potential utility for diagnosis, while miR-155-5p and miR-221-3p could be useful for classification. Further studies are needed to exploit the potential of this field.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document