Comparison of Postoperative Infection between Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy and Open Radical Prostatectomy

2014 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsumi Shigemura ◽  
Kazushi Tanaka ◽  
Fukashi Yamamichi ◽  
Mototsugu Muramaki ◽  
Soichi Arakawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Postoperative Infection ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Laparoscopic Prostatectomy ◽  
Open Radical Prostatectomy

Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy

2021 ◽  
pp. 49-54
Author(s):  
Philipp Dahm
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Comparative Effectiveness ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Propensity Scoring ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Laparoscopic Prostatectomy ◽  
Open Radical Prostatectomy

This chapter summarizes an important observational study using claims-based data that compared minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (mostly performed as robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy) to open radical prostatectomy using propensity scoring. The results favored minimally invasive radical prostatectomy for the outcomes of perioperative complications, rates of transfusion, and length of stay but not other patient-important outcomes.

Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: Do Minimally Invasive Approaches Offer Significant Advantages?

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (32) ◽  
pp. 8170-8175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Smith ◽  
S. Duke Herrell
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Laparoscopic Prostatectomy ◽  
Retropubic Prostatectomy ◽  
Experienced Surgeon ◽  
Open Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Postoperative Continence ◽  
Invasive Surgical Approach

Radical prostatectomy has maintained a cardinal role in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) has been introduced as a less invasive surgical approach. Available data on RALP versus open approaches were reviewed for surgical and cancer related outcomes. RALP is consistently associated with decreased blood loss and limited postoperative pain and hospital stay. Surgical margins seem similar between most reported series of RALP or open radical prostatectomy. Most intrainstitutional comparisons demonstrate better postoperative continence and potency with RALP, but there is still debate about whether results are superior to radical retropubic prostatectomy in the hands of a highly experienced surgeon. RALP provides outcomes at least comparable, and, in some measures, superior to open surgery. Refinements of instrumentation may provide even better results in the future.

696: Positive Influence of Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy on the Collaborative Care Pathway for Open Radical Prostatectomy

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 190-190
Author(s):  
Melissa R. Kaufman ◽  
Roxelyn G. Baumgartner ◽  
Joseph A. Smith ◽  
Sam S. Chang ◽  
S. Duke Herrell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Collaborative Care ◽  
Care Pathway ◽  
Positive Influence ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Laparoscopic Prostatectomy ◽  
Open Radical Prostatectomy

scholarly journals Evidence-Based Comparison of Robotic and Open Radical Prostatectomy

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 2228-2237 ◽  
Author(s):  
William T. Lowrance ◽  
Tatum V. Tarin ◽  
Shahrokh F. Shariat
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Retropubic Prostatectomy ◽  
Open Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
High Quality Evidence ◽  
Quality Evidence

The rapid adoption of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) has occurred despite a lack of high-quality evidence demonstrating its oncologic advantages, safety, or cost effectiveness compared with open radical retropubic prostatectomy (ORP). This review examines the current literature comparing ORP and RALP, focusing on perioperative, oncologic, functional, and economic outcomes.

174 Comparative effectiveness of robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy cancer control outcomes

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. e174
Author(s):  
N. Hanna ◽  
J.C. Hu ◽  
G. Gandaglia ◽  
P.L. Nguyen ◽  
Y-C.T. Shih ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Comparative Effectiveness ◽  
Cancer Control ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Open Radical Prostatectomy

scholarly journals Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: An Objective Assessment and Review of the Literature

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 2589-2061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lester S. Borden Jr. ◽  
Paul M. Kozlowski
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Objective Assessment ◽  
Cancer Control ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Open Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Term Data

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP) has become an accepted treatment option for men with prostate cancer. A search of the available literature through January 2006 was performed to analyze the surgical technique, outcomes data, and other unique issues regarding RLRP. While prospective, randomized trials and long-term data are lacking, short-term data from single institution series have demonstrated outcomes for RLRP that appear to be equivalent to those for open radical prostatectomy (ORP). Although not yet proven, some encouraging data suggest that RLRP may be able to achieve improved cancer control, postoperative urinary control, and erectile function compared to open surgery for prostate cancer. Definite advantages of RLRP over ORP are not yet established. Future studies will determine the role of RLRP in the surgical treatment of men with prostate cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document