Is the Standardized Uptake Value of FDG-PET/CT Predictive of Pathological Complete Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated with Capecitabine-Based Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation?

Oncology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 191-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Bampo ◽  
Alessandra Alessi ◽  
Simona Fantini ◽  
Gaia Bertarelli ◽  
Filippo de Braud ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 505-505
Author(s):  
S. Shanmugan ◽  
R. Arrangoiz ◽  
J. R. Nitzkorski ◽  
J. Q. Yu ◽  
T. Li ◽  
...  

505 Background: Pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation has been observed in 15% to 30% of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The utility of FDG PET/CT scans in the management of patients with stage II or III rectal cancer is not well defined. The objective of this study is to determine if FDG PET/CT can be used to predict pCR and disease-free survival in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation with locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted in patients with endorectal ultrasound-staged T3 to T4 rectal tumors who underwent preoperative and postoperative FGD PET/CT imaging. All patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) of each tumor was recorded. Logistic regression was used to analyze the association of pre-CRT SUV, post-CRT SUV, % SUV change, and time between therapy and surgery in comparison to pathological complete response. Kaplan-Meier estimation was used to look for significant predictors of survival. Results: Seventy patients (mean age 62; 42M:28F) with preoperative stage T3Nx (n = 60) and T4Nx (n = 10) underwent pre-CRT and post-CRT FDG PET/CT scans between November 2002 and March 2009. All patients underwent definitive surgery after therapy with standard pathologic evaluation.The pCR rate was 26%. Median pre-CRT SUV was 10.5 while the median post-CRT SUV was 4.05. Patients with pCR had a lower mean post-CRT SUV compared to those without pCR (2.7 vs. 4.5, p = 0.02). Median SUV decrease was 61% (range 6% to 95%) and was significant in predicting pCR (p = 0.004). Patients with a pCR had a greater time interval between neoadjuvant therapy and surgery (median 57 days vs. 50 days) than those without (p = 0.05). Furthermore, patients with post-CRT SUV < 4 had a lower local recurrence rate compared to those with post-CRT SUV > 4 (p = 0.03). Patients with SUV decrease > 61% had improved overall survival at mean follow-up of 39 months than those without (p = 0.01). Conclusions: PET/CT can predict response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Pre-CRT SUV was the only predictor of disease-free survival. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 697-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric C Sorenson ◽  
Aruj J Choudhry ◽  
Jian Qin Yu ◽  
Sanjay S. Reddy ◽  
Crystal Shereen Denlinger ◽  
...  

697 Background: A major challenge in identifying candidates for nonoperative management of locally advanced rectal cancer is predicting pathological complete response (pCR) following chemoradiation therapy (CRT). We evaluated the ability of pre- and post-CRT PET imaging to predict pCR and long-term prognosis. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients at our institution from 2002–2015 with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent CRT, pre- and post-CRT PET imaging, and surgical resection. Logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to analyze the association of PET variables with tumor pCR and survival outcomes. Receiver operator characteristic curves were generated to define optimal cutoff points for predictive PET variables. Results: 140 patients matched the inclusion criteria. The pCR rate was 28%, and median follow-up time was 48 months. On multivariable analysis, pCR was associated with lower median post-CRT SUVmax(3.2 vs 5.2, p=0.009) and higher median SUV percent decrease (72 vs 58%, p=0.009). ROC curves were generated for SUV percent decrease (AUC=0.70) and post-CRT SUV (AUC=0.69) to estimate cutoff points for maximum specificity and sensitivity to predict pCR. Post-CRT SUV <4.3 and SUV percent decrease of >66% were equally predictive of pCR with a sensitivity of 65%, specificity of 72%, PPV of 44%, and NPV of 86%. Median 5-year OS and RFS were significantly improved for patients with post-CRT SUV <4.3 (OS, 86 vs 66%, p=0.01; RFS, 75 vs 52%, p=0.01) or SUV percent decrease of >66% (OS, 82 vs 66%, p=0.05; RFS, 75 vs 54%, p=0.01). Patients with stage III disease and a post-CRT SUV <4.3 were in effect downstaged, with a median 5-year OS equivalent to that of patients with stage II disease (Table 1; 86 vs 86%). Conclusions: PET/CT may be a useful modality in predicting pCR and overall survival in patients undergoing CRT for rectal cancer. Inclusion of pre-CRT PET does not appear to add prognostic value for pCR compared with post-CRT PET alone. Patients with a post-CRT SUV of >4.3 should not be considered for nonoperative management, as an estimated 86% of these patients will not have a pCR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document