Developing a Translational Research Workforce in the USA

Author(s):  
Thomas A. Pearson ◽  
Wishwa N. Kapoor ◽  
Robert G. Holloway
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shervanthi Homer-Vanniasinkam ◽  
Janice Tsui

Over the last twenty years, revolutionary advances in biomedicine including gene therapy, stem cell research, proteomics, genomics and nanotechnology have highlighted the progressive need to restructure traditional approaches to basic and clinical research in order to facilitate the rapid, efficient integration and translation of these new technologies into novel effective therapeutics. Over the past ten years, funding bodies in the USA and UK such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Medical Research Council (MRC) have been driving translational research by defining and tackling the hurdles but more still remains to be achieved. This article discusses the ongoing challenges translational researchers face and outlines recent initiatives to tackle these including the new changes to translational funding schemes proposed by the NIH and the MRC and the launch of the “European Advanced Translational Research InfraStructure in Medicine” (EATRIS). It is anticipated that initiatives such as these will not only strengthen translational biomedical research programmes already initiated but should lead to rapid benefits to patients and society.


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 662-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Schneider ◽  
Lourdes Guerrero ◽  
Lisa B. Jones ◽  
Greg Tong ◽  
Christine Ireland ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda B. Cottler ◽  
Alan I. Green ◽  
Harold Alan Pincus ◽  
Scott McIntosh ◽  
Jennifer L. Humensky ◽  
...  

AbstractThe opioid crisis in the USA requires immediate action through clinical and translational research. Already built network infrastructure through funding by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) provides a major advantage to implement opioid-focused research which together could address this crisis. NIDA supports training grants and clinical trial networks; NCATS funds the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Program with over 50 NCATS academic research hubs for regional clinical and translational research. Together, there is unique capacity for clinical research, bioinformatics, data science, community engagement, regulatory science, institutional partnerships, training and career development, and other key translational elements. The CTSA hubs provide unprecedented and timely response to local, regional, and national health crises to address research gaps [Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program, Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration, Synergy paper request for applications]. This paper describes opportunities for collaborative opioid research at CTSA hubs and NIDA–NCATS opportunities that build capacity for best practices as this crisis evolves. Results of a Landscape Survey (among 63 hubs) are provided with descriptions of best practices and ideas for collaborations, with research conducted by hubs also involved in premier NIDA initiatives. Such collaborations could provide a rapid response to the opioid epidemic while advancing science in multiple disciplinary areas.


Author(s):  
Tammy L. Loucks ◽  
Jillian Harvey ◽  
Diana Lee-Chavarria ◽  
Rechelle Paranal ◽  
Kathleen A. Lenert ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 913-926
Author(s):  
Anne E Winkler ◽  
Sharon G Levin ◽  
Michael T Allison

Abstract The biomedical research workforce plays a crucial role in fostering economic growth and improving public health through discoveries and innovations. This study fills a knowledge gap by providing a comprehensive portrait of this workforce and retention within it. A distinguishing feature is that we use an occupation-based definition which allows us to look ‘backward’ to field of training and assess the extent to which it has grown more interdisciplinary, and how this differs by gender. The analysis is conducted using restricted-use SESTAT data, the most comprehensive dataset on the scientific workforce in the USA, for the years 1993, 2003, and 2010. Among the findings, we identify differences in interdisciplinarity in training by gender, and these differences have widened. In the retention analysis, which focuses on the 7-year period, 2003–10, we find that retention is negatively and significantly associated with interdisciplinary training for women, but not for men.


2018 ◽  
Vol 110 (6) ◽  
pp. 598-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Estela S. Estape ◽  
Alexander Quarshie ◽  
Barbara Segarra ◽  
María San Martin ◽  
Ruth Ríos ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 563-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn A. Nearing ◽  
Cerise Hunt ◽  
Jessica H. Presley ◽  
Bridget M. Nuechterlein ◽  
Marc Moss ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 90 (7) ◽  
pp. 861-865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen L. Yin ◽  
Janice Gabrilove ◽  
Rebecca Jackson ◽  
Carol Sweeney ◽  
Alecia M. Fair ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A16-A16 ◽  
Author(s):  
N VAKIL ◽  
S TREML ◽  
M SHAW ◽  
R KIRBY

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document