scholarly journals 5q31 Microdeletions: Definition of a Critical Region and Analysis ofLRRTM2,a Candidate Gene for Intellectual Disability

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Kleffmann ◽  
A.M. Zink ◽  
J.A. Lee ◽  
J. Senderek ◽  
E. Mangold ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. e0208324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan McSherry ◽  
Katherine E. Masih ◽  
Nursel H. Elcioglu ◽  
Pelin Celik ◽  
Ozge Balci ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 29-36
Author(s):  
Robert L. Schalock ◽  
Ruth Luckasson ◽  
Marc J. Tassé

Significant international work in the field of intellectual disability (ID) over the last decade has resulted in an emerging consensus regarding the definition of ID, the criteria used to diagnose a person with ID, the classification of individuals who have been diagnosed with ID, and the planning of individualized supports for people with ID. This article describes that emerging consensus


Introduction 2 Identifying intellectual disability 4 Degree of intellectual disability 6 Definition of intellectual disability 8 Incidence and prevalence of intellectual disability 10 Diagnosing intellectual disability 12 Causes and manifestations of intellectual disability 14 Common conditions among people with intellectual disability 16 Defining intellectual disability nursing ...


2019 ◽  
Vol 215 (5) ◽  
pp. 633-635
Author(s):  
Sheila Hollins ◽  
Keri-Michèle Lodge ◽  
Paul Lomax

SummaryIntellectual disability (also known as learning disability in UK health services) and autism are distinct from the serious mental illnesses for which the Mental Health Act is designed to be used. Their inclusion in the definition of mental disorder is discriminatory, resulting in unjust deprivations of liberty. Intellectual disability and autism should be excluded from the Mental Health Act.Declaration of interestNone.


1998 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 340-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Poltorak ◽  
Irina Smirnova ◽  
Xiaolong He ◽  
Mu-Ya Liu ◽  
Christophe Van Huffel ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Voineagu ◽  
L Huang ◽  
K Winden ◽  
M Lazaro ◽  
E Haan ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karrie A. Shogren

Abstract In light of the rapid evolution of research, policy, and practice in the intellectual disability (ID) field resulting from shifts in our conceptualization of disability and in frameworks for the diagnosis and classification of ID, systematic consideration of the multiple, interrelated contextual factors that impact research, policy, and practice are necessary to achieve valued outcomes for individuals with disabilities, their families, and society. The purpose of this article is to introduce a recently developed consensus definition of context and elaborate on application of this definition to research, practice, and policy in the ID field, with a specific focus on how context may be able to serve as an integrative concept to support the attainment of valued outcomes in the disability field for individuals with disabilities, their families, and society.


2014 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aimilia Papazoglou ◽  
Lisa A. Jacobson ◽  
Marie McCabe ◽  
Walter Kaufmann ◽  
T. Andrew Zabel

Abstract The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders—Fifth Edition (DSM-5) diagnostic criteria for intellectual disability (ID) include a change to the definition of adaptive impairment. New criteria require impairment in one adaptive domain rather than two or more skill areas. The authors examined the diagnostic implications of using a popular adaptive skill inventory, the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System–Second Edition, with 884 clinically referred children (ages 6–16). One hundred sixty-six children met DSM-IV-TR criteria for ID; significantly fewer (n  =  151, p  =  .001) met ID criteria under DSM-5 (9% decrease). Implementation of DSM-5 criteria for ID may substantively change the rate of ID diagnosis. These findings highlight the need for a combination of psychometric assessment and clinical judgment when implementing the adaptive deficits component of the DSM-5 criteria for ID diagnosis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14(63) (1) ◽  
pp. 247-252
Author(s):  
B.C. UNGUREAN ◽  
◽  
◽  

The onset of intellectual disability is marked by impairment of all parts that contribute to an individual's intelligence, such as the functions of socialization, knowledge, speech, and motor function. Intellectual disability is also defined, involving significant limitations in both intellectual functioning and adaptive behavior, which cover many daily social, motor, and practical skills. The most commonly accepted definition of intellectual disability is that provided by AAIDD: “Intellectual disability is a disability characterized by significant reductions in both mental functioning and adaptive behavior, covering many daily social and practical skills. This disability originates before the age of 18.”


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document