Screening and Clinical Assessment of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia

Lingual Strengthening: Success in an Outpatient Setting

Perspectives on Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders (Dysphagia) ◽

10.1044/sasd24.2.71 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 24 (2) ◽

pp. 71-74

Author(s):

Ali Meier

Keyword(s):

Oropharyngeal Dysphagia ◽

Patient Discharge ◽

Outpatient Setting ◽

Oral Performance ◽

Exercise Protocol ◽

Anterior Position ◽

Tongue Position ◽

Bolus Propulsion ◽

Posterior Position

In the last decade or more, dysphagia research has investigated the effect of lingual strengthening on oropharyngeal dysphagia with promising results. Much of this research has utilized strengthening devices such as the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) or the Madison Oral Strengthening Therapeutic (MOST) Device. Patients are often given a device to use, and are able to complete an exercise protocol daily or multiple times per day. This case study was completed to determine the effectiveness of using the IOPI in an outpatient clinic where therapy was conducted two to three times per week. The patient was seen post tongue resection due to oropharyngeal cancer. From initiation of IOPI use to patient discharge, the patient demonstrated a 71% increase in lingual strength at the anterior position, a 61% increase at the posterior position, and a 314% increase at the base of tongue position. His diet advanced from NPO to general based on gains in lingual strength and bolus propulsion.

Download Full-text

Research Consumerism 101: Evaluating External Evidence of Treatment Effectiveness

Perspectives on Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders (Dysphagia) ◽

10.1044/sasd17.2.43 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 17 (2) ◽

pp. 43-49

Author(s):

James L. Coyle

Keyword(s):

Treatment Effectiveness ◽

Code Of Ethics ◽

Oropharyngeal Dysphagia ◽

Clinical Importance ◽

Professional Services ◽

Adverse Outcomes ◽

Professional Judgment ◽

Evidence Based ◽

Intervention Selection ◽

Published Research

Abstract The modern clinician is a research consumer. Rehabilitation of oropharyngeal impairments, and prevention of the adverse outcomes of dysphagia, requires the clinician to select interventions for which evidence of a reasonable likelihood of a successful, important outcome exists. The purpose of this paper is to provide strategies for evaluation of published research regarding treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia. This article utilizes tutorial and examples to inform and educate practitioners in methods of appraising published research. It provides and encourages the use of methods of efficiently evaluating the validity and clinical importance of published research. Additionally, it discusses the importance of the ethical obligation we, as practitioners, have to use evidence-based treatment selection methods and measurement of patient performance during therapy. The reader is provided with tactics for evaluating treatment studies to establish a study's validity and, thereby, objectively select interventions. The importance of avoiding subjective or unsubstantiated claims and using objective methods of generating empirical clinical evidence is emphasized. The ability to evaluate the quality of research provides clinicians with objective intervention selection as an important, essential component of evidence-based clinical practice. ASHA Code of Ethics (2003): Principle I, Rule F: “Individuals shall fully inform the persons they serve of the nature and possible effects of services rendered and products dispensed…” (p. 2) Principle I, Rule G: “Individuals shall evaluate the effectiveness of services rendered and of products dispensed and shall provide services or dispense products only when benefit can reasonably be expected.” (p. 2) Principle IV, Rule G: “Individuals shall not provide professional services without exercising independent professional judgment, regardless of referral source or prescription.” (p. 4)

Download Full-text