scholarly journals Influence of Polymorphisms in Genes Encoding for Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF)-I, Insulin, and IGF-Binding Protein (IGFBP)-3 on IGF-I, IGF-II, and IGFBP-3 Levels in Umbilical Cord Plasma

2012 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. 341-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Landmann ◽  
Barbara Kollerits ◽  
Joachim Gerhard Kreuder ◽  
Werner Friedrich Blum ◽  
Florian Kronenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Umbilical Cord ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Insulin Like Growth Factor ◽  
Cord Plasma ◽  
Igf I ◽  
Genes Encoding ◽  
Igf Binding ◽  
Igf Binding Protein ◽  
Igfbp 3

Specimen processing time and measurement of total insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), free IGF-I, and IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3)

2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiffany G. Harris ◽  
Howard D. Strickler ◽  
Herbert Yu ◽  
Michael N. Pollak ◽  
E. Scott Monrad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Processing Time ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Insulin Like Growth Factor ◽  
Factor I ◽  
Igf I ◽  
Specimen Processing ◽  
Igf Binding ◽  
Igf Binding Protein ◽  
Igfbp 3

scholarly journals Genetic Determinants of Circulating Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF)-I, IGF Binding Protein (BP)-1, and IGFBP-3 Levels in a Multiethnic Population

2007 ◽  
Vol 92 (9) ◽  
pp. 3660-3666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iona Cheng ◽  
Katherine DeLellis Henderson ◽  
Christopher A. Haiman ◽  
Laurence N. Kolonel ◽  
Brian E. Henderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Insulin Like Growth Factor ◽  
Genetic Determinants ◽  
Igf I ◽  
Igf Binding ◽  
Multiethnic Population ◽  
Igf Binding Protein ◽  
Igfbp 3

Reference ranges for two automated chemiluminescent assays for serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3)

2004 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin W. Elmlinger ◽  
Werner Kühnel ◽  
Matthias M. Weber ◽  
Michael B. Ranke
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Reference Ranges ◽  
Insulin Like Growth Factor ◽  
Factor I ◽  
Igf I ◽  
Igf Binding ◽  
Growth Factor I ◽  
Igf Binding Protein ◽  
Igfbp 3

AbstractAssays for insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) have become essential tools in the diagnostic work-up of disorders of the somatotropic axis in children and adults. The aim of this study was to evaluate the automated IMMULITE

No evidence for reduced spontaneous or growth-hormone-stimulated serum levels of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF-II or IGF binding protein 3 in women with spinal osteoporosis

1994 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Kassem ◽  
K Brixen ◽  
W Blum ◽  
L Mosekilde ◽  
EF Eriksen
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Insulin Like Growth Factor ◽  
Spinal Osteoporosis ◽  
Igf I ◽  
Igf Binding ◽  
Igf Binding Protein ◽  
Igfbp 3

Kassem M, Brixen K, Blum W, Mosekilde L, Eriksen EF. No evidence for reduced spontaneous or growth-hormone-stimulated serum levels of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF-II or IGF binding protein 3 in women with spinal osteoporosis. Eur J Endocrinol 1994;131:150–5. ISSN 0804–4643 To test the hypothesis that a dysfunctional growth hormone (GH)–insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis may play a role in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis, we compared the levels of IGF-I, IGF-II and IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) in 15 women with spinal osteoporosis (i.e. at least one non-traumatic vertebral fracture) and 15 normal age-matched women. Furthermore, the response to 3 days' treatment with recombinant human GH (r-hGH) (0.2 IU kg−1·day−1) was determined. The basal levels of IGF-I, IGF-II and IGFBP-3 were similar in patients and controls (mean ± sem): IGF-I, 16.5 ± 1.3 versus 16.0 ± 1.3 nmol/l (NS); IGF-II, 79.9 ± 3.6 versus 72.5 ± 4.1 nmol/l (NS); and IGFBP-3, 125.7 ± 6.5 versus 130.3 ± 7.8 nmol/l (NS). Stimulation with r-hGH elicited increased levels of IGF-I, IGF-II and IGFBP-3 within both groups (p < 0.001). The maximal values expressed as a percentage of baseline were: IGF-I, 341 ± 26% versus 369 ± 22%, IGF-II, 125 ± 4% versus 119 ± 5%, IGFBP-3, 141 ± 5% versus 147 ± 7% in osteoporotic patients and controls, respectively. No significant differences were observed between patients and controls in either their maximal response or in the area under the response curves. Our results do not support the hypothesis of a dysfunctional GH–IGF axis in women with spinal osteoporosis. Kim Brixen, University Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Aarhus Amtssygehus, Tage-Hansens gade 2, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document