Treatment Outcome for Children Born with Cleft Lip and Palate

2012 ◽  
pp. 91-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Sandy ◽  
Nicky Kilpatrick ◽  
Anthony Ireland
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate

scholarly journals Long-Term Treatment Outcome of Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 333-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacey L. Clark ◽  
John F. Teichgraeber ◽  
Ruth G. Fleshman ◽  
Joi D. Shaw ◽  
Carmen Chavarria ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Nasoalveolar Molding

The Eurocleft Study: Intercenter Study of Treatment Outcome in Patients with Complete Cleft Lip and Palate. Part 4: Relationship among Treatment Outcome, Patient/Parent Satisfaction, and the Burden of Care

2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunvor Semb ◽  
Viveca Brattström ◽  
Kirsten Mølsted ◽  
Birte Prahl-Andersen ◽  
Petra Zuurbier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Parent Satisfaction ◽  
Northern Europe ◽  
Burden Of Care ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Questionnaire Surveys ◽  
High Level

Objective To assess patient/parent satisfaction with the treatment they had received from their respective teams, and to explore interrelationships between satisfaction, objectively rated outcome, and the burden of care. Design This study reports cross-sectional data as part of the overall longitudinal cohort study reported in the other four papers of this series. Setting Multidisciplinary cleft services in Northern Europe. Subjects 127 consecutively treated 17-year-olds with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate and their parents. Main Outcome Measure Patient/parent satisfaction. Results Generally, there was a high level of patient/parent satisfaction. There were no relationships among satisfaction, objectively rated outcomes, and the amount of care. Conclusions This study highlights various challenges involved in questionnaire surveys into patient/parent satisfaction, and underlines the need for collective efforts to improve our understanding of this issue.

Dentoalveolar Cleft Treatment Outcome Using Modified Huddart-Bodenham Index and Regression Analysis of Associated Factors

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 682-687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anas Imran Arshad ◽  
Mohammad Khursheed Alam ◽  
Mohammad Fadhli Khamis
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Total Occlusion ◽  
Final Model ◽  
History Of ◽  
Permanent Molars ◽  
Dental Models ◽  
Postnatal Factors

Objectives: The aim of this study is to assess the treatment outcome of complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (CUCLP) patients using modified Huddart/Bodenham scoring system (MHB). To determine whether there is an association of congenital and postnatal factors with the treatment outcome. Design: Retrospective observational study. Setting: Two regional cleft-referral centers. Main Outcome Measures: In the current study, 101 pairs of dental models of non-syndromic CUCLP patients were retrieved from hospital archives. Each occlusal relationship from central incisor till the first permanent molars were scored except the lateral incisor. Sum of 10 occlusal relationships in each study sample gave a total occlusion score. The primary outcome was the mean total occlusion score. Results: According to MHB, a mean (standard deviation) total occlusion score of –8.92 (6.89) was determined. Based on treatment outcome, 66 cases were favorable (grades 1, 2, and 3) and 35 cases were unfavorable (grades 4 and 5). Chi-square tests indicated, difference of cheiloplasty ( P = .001) and palatoplasty ( P < .001) statistically significant. Five variables—gender, family history of cleft, cleft side, cheiloplasty, and palatoplasty—were analyzed with a logistic regression model. Conclusions: Final model indicated that cases treated with modified Millard technique (cheiloplasty) and Veau-Wardill-Kilner method (palatoplasty) had higher odds of unfavorable treatment outcome.

Comparison of Two Scoring Systems for Evaluation of Treatment Outcome in Patients with Complete Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 455-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodosia Bartzela ◽  
Charlotte Leenarts ◽  
Ewald Bronkhorst ◽  
Wilfred Borstlap ◽  
Christos Katsaros ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip

scholarly journals Treatment Outcome Based on GOSLON Score of Multiple Factors in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Children of Four Different Ethnic

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Mohammad Khursheed Alam ◽  
Sanjida Haque ◽  
Takashi S. Kajii ◽  
Yoshiaki Sato ◽  
Mohd Fadhli Khamis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Multiple Factors

scholarly journals The Assessment of Treatment Outcome by Evaluation of Dental Arch Relationships in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Children using mHB Scoring System

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-202
Author(s):  
Mazida Najwa Md. Zin ◽  
Mohammad Khursheed Alam ◽  
Sanjida Haque ◽  
Tohru Imanishi ◽  
Jin Toriya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Dental Arch

The Eurocleft Study: Intercenter Study of Treatment Outcome in Patients with Complete Cleft Lip and Palate. Part 2: Craniofacial Form and Nasolabial Appearance

2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viveca Brattström ◽  
Kirsten Mølsted ◽  
Birte Prahl-Andersen ◽  
Gunvor Semb ◽  
William C. Shaw
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Craniofacial Morphology ◽  
Longitudinal Cohort Study ◽  
Northern Europe ◽  
Lower Face ◽  
Ratio Variables

Objective To compare craniofacial morphology and nasolabial appearance up to age 17 in individuals with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) treated at five European centers. Design Longitudinal cohort study. Setting Multidisciplinary cleft services in Northern Europe. Subjects 127 consecutively treated individuals with repaired complete UCLP. Main outcome measures Cephalometric variables, 14 angular and 2 ratio variables, and panel ratings of nasolabial appearance, 4 variables. Results The results revealed that at ages 12 and 17, two centers had a flatter profile (gs-sn-pgs) and retrognathic maxilla (sss-ns-sms). Additionally, one of the two centers had increased lower face height. Ratings of nasolabial appearance showed more similarity between the centers. Conclusion The results confirm that systematic differences in craniofacial morphology and nasolabial appearance may occur between different cleft centers, but do not allow specific caused factors to be identified.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document