Single- and Double-Row Repair for Rotator Cuff Tears – Biology and Mechanics

2011 ◽  
pp. 122-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rocco Papalia ◽  
Francesco Franceschi ◽  
Sebastiano Vasta ◽  
Biagio Zampogna ◽  
Nicola Maffulli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Double Row Repair

scholarly journals Double-Row Repair Technique for Bursal-Sided Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. e199-e203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hytham Salem ◽  
Aaron Carter ◽  
Fotios Tjoumakaris ◽  
Kevin B. Freedman
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Repair Technique ◽  
Partial Thickness ◽  
Double Row Repair

scholarly journals Comparison of arthroscopic single-row and double-row repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears

Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (29) ◽  
pp. e21030
Author(s):  
Yanming Lin ◽  
Jiasong Zhao ◽  
Heng Qiu ◽  
Yong Huang
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Single Row ◽  
Double Row Repair

scholarly journals Summary of Meta-Analyses Dealing with Single-Row versus Double-Row Repair Techniques for Rotator Cuff Tears

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 330-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
U.J. Spiegl ◽  
S.A. Euler ◽  
P.J. Millett ◽  
P. Hepp
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Single Row ◽  
Level I ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Double Row Repair

Background: Several meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials have been performed to analyze whether double-row (DR) rotator cuff repair (RCR) provides superior clinical outcomes and structural healing compared to single-row (SR) repair. The purpose of this study was to sum up the results of meta-analysis comparing SR and DR repair with respect on clinical outcomes and re-tear rates. Methods: A literature search was undertaken to identify all meta-analyses dealing with randomized controlled trials comparing clinical und structural outcomes after SR versus DR RCR. Results: Eight meta-analyses met the eligibility criteria: two including Level I studies only, five including both Level I and Level II studies, and one including additional Level III studies. Four meta-analyses found no differences between SR and DR RCR for patient outcomes, whereas four favored DR RCR for tears greater than 3 cm. Two meta-analyses found no structural healing differences between SR and DR RCR, whereas six found DR repair to be superior for tears greater than 3 cm tears. Conclusion: No clinical differences are seen between single-row and double-row repair for small and medium rotator cuff tears after a short-term follow-up period with a higher re-tear rate following single-row repairs. There seems to be a trend to superior results with double-row repair in large to massive tear sizes.

Regarding “Meta-analysis comparing single-row and double-row repair techniques in the arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff tears”

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. e223-e225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan D. Faulkner ◽  
Mark H. Getelman ◽  
Joseph P. Burns ◽  
Michael S. Bahk ◽  
Ronald P. Karzel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Arthroscopic Treatment ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Single Row ◽  
Double Row Repair ◽  
Repair Techniques

Single-Row Repair Versus Double-Row Repair of Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 978-985 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niti Prasathaporn ◽  
Somsak Kuptniratsaikul ◽  
Kitiphong Kongrukgreatiyos
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Single Row ◽  
Double Row Repair
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document