A Prospective, Clinical Study on Asymptomatic Sensitisation and Development of Allergic Rhinitis: High Negative Predictive Value of Allergological Testing

2011 ◽  
Vol 155 (3) ◽  
pp. 289-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uffe Bodtger ◽  
Kristian Assing ◽  
Lars K. Poulsen
Keyword(s):  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Clinical Study ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Prospective Clinical Study ◽  
High Negative Predictive Value

FDG-PET in Hodgkin lymphoma

2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (06) ◽  
pp. 235-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Dietlein ◽  
C. Mauz-Körholz ◽  
A. Engert ◽  
P. Borchmann ◽  
O. Sabri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Therapy Control ◽  
German Study ◽  
High Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Consolidation Radiotherapy

SummaryThe high negative predictive value of FDG-PET in therapy control of Hodgkin lymphoma is proven by the data acquired up to now. Thus, the analysis of the HD15 trial has shown that consolidation radiotherapy might be omitted in PET negative patients after effective chemotherapy. Further response adapted therapy guided by PET seems to be a promising approach in reducing the toxicity for patients undergoing chemotherapy. The criteria used for the PET interpretation have been standardized by the German study groups for Hodgkin lymphoma patients and will be reevaluated in the current studies.

scholarly journals Association between clinical risk scores and mortality in atrial fibrillation: Systematic review and network meta-regression of 669,000 patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 633-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Proietti ◽  
Alessio Farcomeni ◽  
Giulio Francesco Romiti ◽  
Arianna Di Rocco ◽  
Filippo Placentino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Ability ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Clinical Risk ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
High Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Meta Regression

Aims Many clinical scores for risk stratification in patients with atrial fibrillation have been proposed, and some have been useful in predicting all-cause mortality. We aim to analyse the relationship between clinical risk score and all-cause death occurrence in atrial fibrillation patients. Methods We performed a systematic search in PubMed and Scopus from inception to 22 July 2017. We considered the following scores: ATRIA-Stroke, ATRIA-Bleeding, CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, HAS-BLED, HATCH and ORBIT. Papers reporting data about scores and all-cause death rates were considered. Results Fifty studies and 71 scores groups were included in the analysis, with 669,217 patients. Data on ATRIA-Bleeding, CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED were available. All the scores were significantly associated with an increased risk for all-cause death. All the scores showed modest predictive ability at five years (c-indexes (95% confidence interval) CHADS2: 0.64 (0.63–0.65), CHA2DS2-VASc: 0.62 (0.61–0.64), HAS-BLED: 0.62 (0.58–0.66)). Network meta-regression found no significant differences in predictive ability. CHA2DS2-VASc score had consistently high negative predictive value (≥94%) at one, three and five years of follow-up; conversely it showed the highest probability of being the best performing score (63% at one year, 60% at three years, 68% at five years). Conclusion In atrial fibrillation patients, contemporary clinical risk scores are associated with an increased risk of all-cause death. Use of these scores for death prediction in atrial fibrillation patients could be considered as part of holistic clinical assessment. The CHA2DS2-VASc score had consistently high negative predictive value during follow-up and the highest probability of being the best performing clinical score.

Incidence of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Patients With Newly Implanted Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices

2021 ◽  
pp. 106002802110387
Author(s):  
Long To ◽  
Dana Attar ◽  
Brittany Lines ◽  
Melissa McCarty ◽  
Hassan Nemeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Mechanical Circulatory Support ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Circulatory Support ◽  
Anticoagulation Management ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices ◽  
High Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Release Assay

Background: Heparin exposure and device-related thrombocytopenia complicate the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in patients receiving mechanical circulatory support (MCS). To improve anticoagulation management for patients with newly implanted MCS devices, incidence of confirmed HIT needs to be further characterized. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to describe the incidence of HIT and clinical utility of the 4Ts score in patients with newly implanted MCS devices. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of MCS patients receiving unfractionated heparin from 2014 to 2017. The primary end point was incidence of laboratory-confirmed HIT. Strong positive, likely positive, low probability, and negative HIT categories were established based on heparin-induced platelet antibody (HIPA) and serotonin release assay (SRA). Secondary end points include characterization of platelet trends, argatroban use, incidence of HIT among each of the MCS devices, and utility of 4Ts score. Results: A total of 342 patient encounters met inclusion criteria, of which 68 HIPA tests and 25 SRAs were ordered. The incidence of HIT was 0.88% (3/342) and 4.4% (3/68) in patients with suspected HIT. Of the 68 HIPA tests, 3 (4.4%) were considered strong positive and 3 of the 25 SRAs were positive. Median 4Ts score was 4 [2.5-4] and optical density 0.19 [0.11-0.54]. The positive predictive value for the 4Ts score was 0.15 (CI = 0.03-0.46) and negative predictive value, 0.93 (CI = 0.82-0.98). Conclusion and Relevance: HIT occurs infrequently with newly implanted MCS devices. The 4Ts score appears to have a high negative predictive value for ruling out HIT.

scholarly journals Evaluation of broad-range 16S rRNA PCR for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections: two years of experience

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1252-1258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reem Mostafa Hassan ◽  
Mervat G El Enany ◽  
Hussien H Rizk
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
16S Rrna ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Molecular Techniques ◽  
Molecular Technique ◽  
High Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Patient Groups ◽  
Low Sensitivity

Introduction: Diagnosis of bloodstream infections using bacteriological cultures suffers from low sensitivity and reporting delay. Advanced molecular techniques introduced in many laboratories provide rapid results and may show improvements in patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of a molecular technique, broad-range 16S rRNA PCR followed by sequencing for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections, compared to blood culture in different patient groups. Methodology: Conventional PCR was performed, using broad-range 16S rRNA primers, on blood cultures collected from different patients with suspected bloodstream infections; results were compared with those of blood culture. Results: Though blood culture is regarded as the gold standard, PCR evaluation showed sensitivity of 86.25%, specificity of 91.25%, positive predictive value of 76.67%, negative predictive value of 95.22%, and accuracy of 88.8%. Conclusions: Molecular assays seem not to be sufficient to replace microbial cultures in the diagnosis of bloodstream infections, but they can offer a rapid, good negative test to rule out infection due to their high negative predictive value.

scholarly journals Tu1556 NEGATIVE VIDEO CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY HAD VERY HIGH NEGATIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE FOR SMALL BOWEL LESIONS, BUT BEWARE OF YOUNG PATIENTS

2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. AB617-AB618
Author(s):  
Sipawath Khamplod ◽  
Julajak Limsrivilai ◽  
Sorachat Niltwat ◽  
Uayporn Kaosombatwattana ◽  
Nonthalee Pausawasdi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Small Bowel ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Capsule Endoscopy ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Video Capsule Endoscopy ◽  
High Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Very High
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document