Expression of Estrogen Receptor Beta and Phosphorylation of Estrogen Receptor Alpha Serine 167 Correlate with Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with Aromatase Inhibitors

Oncology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 79 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 55-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuyoshi Motomura ◽  
Makoto Ishitobi ◽  
Yoshifumi Komoike ◽  
Hiroki Koyama ◽  
Hideki Nagase ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Aromatase Inhibitors ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Alpha ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Beta ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Receptor Beta

Cost-effectiveness of everolimus plus exemestane in post-menopausal hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6548-6548
Author(s):  
Simon B. Zeichner ◽  
Kiran Kumar Venkata Raja Avancha ◽  
Gilberto Lopes ◽  
Stefan Gluck ◽  
Alberto J. Montero
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Incremental Cost ◽  
Aromatase Inhibitors ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Steroidal Aromatase Inhibitors

6548 Background: Everolimus in combination with exemestane is approved for the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor (HR) positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The BOLERO-2, a randomized phase 3 trial, demonstrated a significantly improved progression free survival (PFS) with everolimus plus exemestane compared to exemestane alone in patients previously treated with non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors. In order to better inform U.S. policymakers, this study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness, from a payer perspective, of everolimus in combination with exemestane. Methods: We created decision analytical and Markov models using published data from the BOLERO-2 trial. Utilities were derived from available literature. Costs were obtained from the Center for Medicare Services drug payment table and physician fee schedule and were represented in 2012 U.S. dollars. The quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated. One way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Everolimus added 0.42 years of progression-free survival (PFS) by central radiographic assessment with an incremental cost of $33,103, an overall cost of $62,751.54 per year of PFS gained, and an ICER of $79,376/QALY. By local assessment, everolimus added 0.29 years PFS years with an incremental cost of $31,873, an overall cost of $83,222 per year of PFS gained, and an ICER of $108,131/QALY. The results of the model were robust in sensitivity analyses. The primary drivers in this model were found to be: PFS duration, progression free probability on therapy, and overall everolimus cost. Conclusions: Everolimus plus exemestane appears to be cost-effective in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Based on efficacy and value, this newly approved combination should be considered to be a viable option in treating patients with HR+/HER2- MBC upon progression on non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors.

scholarly journals Single arm, phase two study of low-dose metronomic eribulin in metastatic breast cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavani Chalasani ◽  
Kiah Farr ◽  
Vicky Wu ◽  
Isaac Jenkins ◽  
Alex Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background Treatment options for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) refractory to anthracyclines and taxanes are limited. In a phase III trial, eribulin demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival compared to treatment of physician’s choice, but had limited tolerability because of neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy. Based on prior studies of alternative treatment schedules with other therapies, we hypothesized that a low-dose metronomic schedule of eribulin would permit patients to remain on treatment more consistently without treatment delays, resulting in longer time to progression, and improved toxicity profile. Methods We conducted a multi-site single arm, phase II trial patients with MBC. All patients were treated with metronomic eribulin (0.9 mg/m2 administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle.) Treatment was continued until the patient developed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or chose to stop the study. Patients must have had prior taxane exposure. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary end points were overall survival, response rate, and clinical benefit rate. Exploratory biomarkers were performed to analyze change in levels of circulating endothelial cells (CECs), circulating endothelial precursors, and carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) with response to therapy. Findings We consented 86 patients and 59 were evaluable for final analysis. Median age was 59 years; 78% had HER2 negative tumors. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months with overall survival (OS) of 14.3 months. Objective response rate was 15% with clinical benefit rate of 48%. Reported grade 3 neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy were 18% and 5%, respectively. Treatment discontinuation due to toxicity was seen in 3% of patients. Interpretation Metronomic weekly low-dose eribulin is an active and tolerable regimen with significantly less myelosuppression, alopecia, and peripheral neuropathy than is seen with the approved dose and schedule, allowing longer duration of use and disease control, with similar outcomes compared to the standard dose regimen.

Phase III Study of Intravenous Vinorelbine in Combination With Epirubicin Versus Epirubicin Alone in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer: A Scandinavian Breast Group Trial (SBG9403)

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 2313-2320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bent Ejlertsen ◽  
Henning T. Mouridsen ◽  
Sven T. Langkjer ◽  
Jorn Andersen ◽  
Johanna Sjöström ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose To determine whether the addition of intravenous (IV) vinorelbine to epirubicin increased the progression-free survival in first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods A total of 387 patients were randomly assigned to receive IV epirubicin 90 mg/m2 on day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, or epirubicin 90 mg/m2 IV on day 1. Both regimens were given every 3 weeks for a maximum of 1 year but discontinued prematurely in the event of progressive disease or severe toxicity. In addition, epirubicin was discontinued at a cumulative dose of 1,000 mg/m2 (950 mg/m2 from June 1999). Prior anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy and prior chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer was not allowed. Reported results were all based on intent-to-treat analyses. Results Overall response rates to vinorelbine and epirubicin, and epirubicin alone, were 50% and 42%, respectively (P = .15). The complete response rate was significantly superior in the combination arm (17% v 10%; P = .048) as was median duration of progression-free survival (10.1 months v 8.2 months; P = .019). Median survival was similar in the two arms (19.1 months v 18.0 months; P = .50). Leukopenia related complications, stomatitis, and peripheral neuropathy were more common in the combination arm. The incidences of cardiotoxicity and constipation were similar in both arms. Conclusion Addition of vinorelbine to epirubicin conferred a significant advantage in terms of complete response rate and progression-free survival, but not in terms of survival.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document