Relationship of lnterleukin-4 to Isotypic Distribution of Anti-Double-Stranded DNA Antibodies in Systemic Lupus erythematosus

1993 ◽  
Vol 101 (4) ◽  
pp. 408-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Dueymes ◽  
J. Barrier ◽  
J.F. Besancenot ◽  
J. Clèdes ◽  
C. Conri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Double Stranded Dna ◽  
Dna Antibodies ◽  
Relationship Of

scholarly journals Relationship between anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies and exacerbation of renal disease in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

2005 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 1129-1137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew D. Linnik ◽  
Jay Z. Hu ◽  
Kenneth R. Heilbrunn ◽  
Vibeke Strand ◽  
Frank L. Hurley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Renal Disease ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Double Stranded Dna ◽  
Dna Antibodies

scholarly journals Transplanted Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells Facilitate Lesion Repair in B6.Fas Mice

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guang-ping Ruan ◽  
Xiang Yao ◽  
Shuang-juan Yang ◽  
Jin-xiang Wang ◽  
Fan Shu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Stem Cells ◽  
Umbilical Cord ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Human Umbilical Cord ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Multisystem Disease ◽  
Double Stranded Dna ◽  
Dna Antibodies ◽  
Disease Indicators

Background. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem disease that is characterized by the appearance of serum autoantibodies. No effective treatment for SLE currently exists.Methods. We used human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell (H-UC-MSC) transplantation to treat B6.Fas mice.Results. After four rounds of cell transplantation, we observed a statistically significant decrease in the levels of mouse anti-nuclear, anti-histone, and anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies in transplanted mice compared with controls. The percentage of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+T cells in mouse peripheral blood significantly increased after H-UC-MSC transplantation.Conclusions. The results showed that H-UC-MSCs could repair lesions in B6.Fas mice such that all of the relevant disease indicators in B6.Fas mice were restored to the levels observed in normal C57BL/6 mice.

scholarly journals MRL-lpr/lpr Mice Exhibit a Defect in Maintaining Developmental Arrest and Follicular Exclusion of Anti–double-stranded DNA B Cells

1999 ◽  
Vol 189 (11) ◽  
pp. 1799-1814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Mandik-Nayak ◽  
Su-jean Seo ◽  
Caroline Sokol ◽  
Kathryn M. Potts ◽  
Anh Bui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
B Cells ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Genetic Background ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Autoreactive B Cells ◽  
Developmental Arrest ◽  
Double Stranded Dna ◽  
Dna Antibodies ◽  
Cell Defect

A hallmark of systemic lupus erythematosus and the MRL murine model for lupus is the presence of anti–double-stranded (ds)DNA antibodies (Abs). To identify the steps leading to the production of these Abs in autoimmune mice, we have compared the phenotype and localization of anti-dsDNA B cells in autoimmune (MRL+/+ and lpr/lpr) mice with that in nonautoimmune (BALB/c) mice. Anti-dsDNA B cells are actively regulated in BALB/c mice as indicated by their developmental arrest and accumulation at the T–B interface of the splenic follicle. In the MRL genetic background, anti-dsDNA B cells are no longer developmentally arrested, suggesting an intrinsic B cell defect conferred by MRL background genes. With intact Fas, they continue to exhibit follicular exclusion; however, in the presence of the lpr/lpr mutation, anti-dsDNA B cells are now present in the follicle. Coincident with the altered localization of anti-dsDNA B cells is a follicular infiltration of CD4 T cells. Together, these data suggest that MRL mice are defective in maintaining the developmental arrest of autoreactive B cells and indicate a role for Fas in restricting entry into the follicle.

The impact of biological treatments on the anti-dsDNA and anti-nucleosome tests

Lupus ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Infantino ◽  
V Grossi ◽  
M Benucci ◽  
F Li Gobbi ◽  
A Damiani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Inflammatory Arthritis ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Dna Test ◽  
Double Stranded Dna ◽  
Dna Antibodies

Background Anti-double stranded DNA antibodies are a very heterogeneous group of antibodies, quite specific for systemic lupus erythematosus. Newer technologies, such as addressable laser bead immunoassays (ALBIA), show great potential as a diagnostic application. The production of anti-double stranded DNA antibodies is often encountered in inflammatory arthritis; however, literature reports that the actual onset of drug induced lupus in patients treated with biological drugs is a rare event. False positive results for anti-double stranded DNA and anti-nucleosome antibodies detected in patients with inflammatory arthritis treated with different biologics prompted the investigation of full autoantibody profiles to evaluate each biomarker’s diagnostic performance in systemic lupus erythematosus. The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic performance of anti-double stranded DNA antibody and anti-nucleosome antibody methods and to evaluate the value of simultaneously measuring anti-double stranded DNA and anti-nucleosome antibodies, along with other anti-nuclear antibody analytes, as biomarkers for systemic lupus erythematosus, using a more appropriate control cohort including inflammatory arthritis patients with a non-clinical drug induced lupus. Methods Anti-double stranded DNA and anti-nucleosome antibody levels were evaluated in 247 patient samples: 70 systemic lupus erythematosus, 177 disease controls (including 97 inflammatory arthritis during treatment with different biologics) using the Bio-Rad BioPlex® 2200. Results Anti-nucleosome antibodies demonstrated greater clinical sensitivity and specificity than anti-double stranded DNA antibodies. At the manufacturers’ cut-off range, considering the two markers as a single or combined test, the “anti-double stranded DNA test or anti-nucleosome antibodies” was the most sensitive combination (0.400) with the best negative likelihood ratio (0.62) and negative predictive value (0.803). Conclusion Anti-nucleosome antibodies are a more sensitive and specific biomarker of systemic lupus erythematosus than anti-double stranded DNA antibodies. Anti-nucleosome antibodies and anti-double stranded DNA antibodies are independent and complementary markers of systemic lupus erythematosus diagnosis and, therefore, are strongly suggested as combined tests (positive predictive value = 0.938). Moreover, the combined use of the two tests may help to overcome the decreased specificity percentage of the anti-double stranded DNA test, when considering an inflammatory arthritis cohort under biological therapies. The ALBIA method for anti-nuclear specificity detection allows a full autoantibody assessment, resulting in a much higher clinical specificity for systemic lupus erythematosus in the presence of ≥3 positive markers and significantly more positive likelihood ratio when ≥2 positive markers are present.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document