Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research Are Necessary for DSM V

2009 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 330-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas N. Wise
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Psychosomatic Research ◽  
Dsm V

scholarly journals Appendix 1. Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research

2007 ◽  
pp. 169-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Sensky ◽  
G.A Fava ◽  
H.J. Freyberger ◽  
P. Bech ◽  
G. Christodoulou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Psychosomatic Research

scholarly journals Harmonisation of ICD–11 and DSM–V: opportunities and challenges

2009 ◽  
Vol 195 (5) ◽  
pp. 382-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael B. First
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Prior Experience ◽  
International Communication ◽  
Tic Disorder ◽  
Parallel Development ◽  
Dsm V ◽  
Two Systems ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Dsm Iv

BackgroundDifferences in the ICD–10 and DSM–IV definitions for the same disorder impede international communication and research efforts. The forthcoming parallel development of DSM–V and ICD–11 offers an opportunity to harmonise the two classifications.AimsThis paper aims to facilitate the harmonisation process by identifying diagnostic differences between the two systems.MethodDSM–IV–TR criteria sets and the ICD–10 Diagnostic Criteria for Research were compared and categorised into those with identical definitions, those with conceptually based differences and those in which differences are not conceptually based and appear to be unintentional.ResultsOf the 176 criteria sets in both systems, only one, transient tic disorder, is identical. Twenty-one per cent had conceptually based differences and 78% had non-conceptually based differences.ConclusionsHarmonisation of criteria sets, especially those with non-conceptually based differences, should be prioritised in the DSM–V and ICD–11 development process. Prior experience with the DSM–IV and ICD–10 harmonisation effort suggests that for the process to be successful steps should be taken as early as possible.

scholarly journals Mnemonics for diagnostic criteria of DSM V mental disorders: a scoping review

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. e100109
Author(s):  
Pavan Kumar Kadiyala
Keyword(s):  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Classification Systems ◽  
Journal Articles ◽  
Specific Symptom ◽  
Dsm V ◽  
Google Books ◽  
Comprehensive Search ◽  
Google Search

A multitude of psychiatric disorders have been described in classification systems like the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition (DSM V). Diagnosing a specific mental disorder requires memorising specific symptom criteria, and their improper recall may result in misdiagnosis. Clinicians may use mnemonics, considering them as narratives or anecdotes of the diagnostic criteria. A scoping review of previously described mnemonics for DSM diagnostic criteria was carried out. An electronic search was done in PubMed, Google Scholar, Google Books and Google Search engine using a prespecified search strategy. Reference lists of relevant articles and chapters were hand searched to identify original and additional articles. Mnemonics retrieved from websites were manually searched in Google to identify published journal articles or chapters for the same mnemonics. Additionally, some mnemonics were developed, modified or added based on the author’s knowledge. The comprehensive search identified 93 records (44 journal articles, 45 books and 4 websites) eligible for the review. Most of the mnemonics retrieved were related in some way to the disorder itself. They were listed under the heading of their respective disorders and indexed in the same order as in DSM V. The mnemonics that reflect a facet of their respective disorders were elaborated in detail.

Comments on “Considerations for Diagnostic Criteria for Erectile Dysfunction in DSM-V”

2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 661-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward D. Kim ◽  
Ian Eardley ◽  
Barry W. Mc Carthy ◽  
Michael Sand ◽  
Christian Nelson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Erectile Dysfunction ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Dsm V

Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research and Psychosocial Variables in Breast Cancer Patients

2004 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 483-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Grassi ◽  
Elena Rossi ◽  
Silvana Sabato ◽  
Giorgio Cruciani ◽  
Maurizio Zambelli
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Psychosocial Variables ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Psychosomatic Research
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document