Interactions between Granulocytes and Platelets with the Guinea-Pig Lung in Passive Anaphylactic Shock. Correlations with PAF-Acether-Induced Lesions

1987 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arielle Lellouch-Tubiana ◽  
Jean Lefort ◽  
A. Pfister ◽  
B.B. Vargaftig
Keyword(s):  
Guinea Pig ◽  
Anaphylactic Shock

Effects of Anaphylactic Shock and Compound 48/80 on the Mast Cells of the Guinea Pig Lung

Nature ◽  
1956 ◽  
Vol 177 (4505) ◽  
pp. 427-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
IVAN MOTA ◽  
ITAMAR VUGMAN
Keyword(s):  
Mast Cells ◽  
Guinea Pig ◽  
Anaphylactic Shock

scholarly journals VI. —Anaphylaxis and anaphylatoxins

1923 ◽  
Vol 211 (382-390) ◽  
pp. 273-315 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Central Nervous System ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Guinea Pig ◽  
Anaphylactic Shock ◽  
The Body ◽  
Muscle Fibres ◽  
Direct Stimulation ◽  
Fundamental Conception ◽  
The Central Nervous System ◽  
Stimulation Of

In the study of the phenomena of anaphylaxis there are certain points on which some measure of agreement seems to have been attained. In the case of anaphylaxis to soluble proteins, with which alone we are directly concerned in this paper, the majority of investigators probably accept the view that the condition is due to the formation of an antibody of the precipitin type. Concerning the method, however, by which the presence of this antibody causes the specific sensitiveness, the means by which its interaction with the antibody produces the anaphylactic shock, there is a wide divergence of conception. Two main currents of speculation can be discerned. One view, historically rather the earlier, and first put forward by Besredka (1) attributes the anaphylactic condition to the location of the antibody in the body cells. There is not complete unanimity among adherents of this view as to the nature of the antibody concerned, or as to the class of cells containing it which are primarily affected in the anaphylactic shock. Besredka (2) himself has apparently not accepted the identification of the anaphylactic antibody with a precipitin, but regards it as belonging to a special class (sensibilisine). He also regards the cells of the central nervous system as those primarily involved in the anaphylactic shock in the guinea-pig. Others, including one of us (3), have found no adequate reason for rejecting the strong evidence in favour of the precipitin nature of the anaphylactic antibody, produced by Doerr and Russ (4), Weil (5), and others, and have accepted and confirmed the description of the rapid anaphylactic death in the guinea-pig as due to a direct stimulation of the plain-muscle fibres surrounding the bronchioles, causing valve-like obstruction of the lumen, and leading to asphyxia, with the characteristic fixed distension of the lungs, as first described by Auer and Lewis (6), and almost simultaneously by Biedl and Kraus (7). But the fundamental conception of anaphylaxis as due to cellular location of an antibody, and of the reaction as due to the union of antigen and antibody taking place in the protoplasm, is common to a number of workers who thus differ on details.

scholarly journals Passive Anaphylaxis following the immediate injection of Antigen after Antiserum

1936 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 570-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. R. Dean ◽  
R. Williamson ◽  
G. L. Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Guinea Pig ◽  
Intravenous Injection ◽  
Anaphylactic Shock ◽  
The Body ◽  
Post Mortem ◽  
Abdominal Symptoms ◽  
Respiratory Embarrassment

1. Our experiments show that an intravenous injection of antigen immediately after an intravenous injection of antiserum in the guinea-pig were followed by:(a) Acute shock and death within 5 min. The signs and post-mortem appearances were indistinguishable from acute anaphylactic shock as typically seen in the guinea-pig. Some control animals injected with antiserum only died in a way similar to those which received both antiserum and antigen. These are discussed in detail in the body of the paper.(b) Delayed shock and death some hours later. The post-mortem appearances were those of gastro-intestinal congestion and haemorrhage resembling the changes seen in dogs dying of anaphylactic shock. Such changes were never seen in the control animals.(c) Recovery. Practically all the animals which recovered had symptoms of respiratory embarrassment immediately following the injections of anti-serum and antigen and many had later symptoms of abdominal shock. The animals which were given an injection of antiserum only rarely had any symptoms and never abdominal symptoms.2. It is necessary to test the antisera used by control inoculation since some antisera are toxic.

scholarly journals ASPERMATOGENESIS, ANAPHYLAXIS, AND CUTANEOUS SENSITIZATION INDUCED IN THE GUINEA PIG BY HOMOLOGOUS TESTICULAR EXTRACT

1955 ◽  
Vol 101 (6) ◽  
pp. 591-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jules Freund ◽  
George E. Thompson ◽  
Murray M. Lipton
Keyword(s):  
Acetic Acid ◽  
Guinea Pig ◽  
Ammonium Sulfate ◽  
Guinea Pigs ◽  
Anaphylactic Shock ◽  
Proteolytic Enzymes ◽  
Trichloracetic Acid ◽  
Oil Emulsion ◽  
Highly Active ◽  
Water In Oil Emulsion

Guinea pig testicles were extracted with acetic acid; the extract was purified by removing material in consecutive precipitations with 30 per cent saturated ammonium-sulfate, trichloracetic acid, and chloroform. The solution so purified, when administered with complete adjuvants, was highly active in inducing impairment of spermatogenesis in guinea pigs. The activity resisted autoclaving at 15 pounds' pressure for 20 minutes, proteolytic enzymes, and formamide. Anaphylactic shock and cutaneous reaction to the purified homologous extract occurred in guinea pigs sensitized by the extract combined with adjuvants. For the production of aspermatogenesis it was essential to incorporate killed mycobacteria into the water-in-oil emulsion containing the antigen; but anaphylactic sensitization did not require the presence of mycobacteria.

scholarly journals Reversed passive anaphylaxis in the guinea-pig

1940 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 377-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. van den Ende
Keyword(s):  
Guinea Pig ◽  
Intravenous Injection ◽  
Guinea Pigs ◽  
Anaphylactic Shock ◽  
Cellular Mechanism ◽  
Rabbit Serum ◽  
Rabbit Antibody ◽  
Egg Albumin

Attempts to demonstrate reversed passive anaphylaxis in the guinea-pig with crystalline egg albumin as sensitizing antigen have been uniformly negative.When purified anti-pneumococcal antibody globulin was used as sensitizing antigen, reversed anaphylactic shock could be elicited in guinea-pigs by the intravenous injection of precipitins for the antibody globulin.The mild reactions which could be elicited when the total globulins from the serum of normal rabbits were used as sensitizing antigen are probably dependent on the presence of small amounts of y globulin.Reversed passive anaphylaxis, like direct anaphylaxis, is dependent on a cellular mechanism, and the success of experiments in which rabbit antibody globulin was used as sensitizing antigen depends on the acceptability of the antibody to the cells of the guinea-pig's tissues.Antigenic differences between antibody globulins and total normal globulins from rabbit serum are noted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document