Cyclic Sequential Endocrine Therapy for Advanced Breast Cancer Using a Combination of Tamoxifen and Megestrol Acetate

Oncology ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek J. Crawford ◽  
David George ◽  
David C. Smith ◽  
Moira Stewart ◽  
James Paul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Megestrol Acetate ◽  
Sequential Endocrine Therapy

scholarly journals Circulating tumor DNA dynamics in advanced breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibition and endocrine therapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga Martínez-Sáez ◽  
Tomás Pascual ◽  
Fara Brasó-Maristany ◽  
Nuria Chic ◽  
Blanca González-Farré ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Methodological Approach ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Dna Dynamics ◽  
Ca 15.3 ◽  
Tumor Dna

AbstractCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels may predict response to anticancer drugs, including CDK4/6 inhibitors and endocrine therapy combinations (CDK4/6i+ET); however, critical questions remain unanswered such as which assay or statistical method to use. Here, we obtained paired plasma samples at baseline and week 4 in 45 consecutive patients with advanced breast cancer treated with CDK4/6i+ET. ctDNA was detected in 96% of cases using the 74-gene Guardant360 assay. A variant allele fraction ratio (VAFR) was calculated for each of the 79 detected mutations between both timepoints. Mean of all VAFRs (mVAFR) was computed for each patient. In our dataset, mVAFR was significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS). Baseline VAF, on-treatment VAF or absolute changes in VAF were not associated with PFS, nor were CA-15.3 levels at baseline, week 4 or the CA-15.3 ratio. These findings demonstrate that ctDNA dynamics using a standardized multi-gene panel and a unique methodological approach predicts treatment outcome. Clinical trials in patients with an unfavorable ctDNA response are needed.

Megestrol acetate: Phase II study of a single daily administration in advanced breast cancer

1990 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Pronzato ◽  
Fulvio Brema ◽  
Domenico Amoroso ◽  
Gianfilippo Bertelli ◽  
Pier Franco Conte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Megestrol Acetate ◽  
Daily Administration

Everolimus and exemestane in hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: A comprehensive cancer center’s experience.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13017-e13017
Author(s):  
Inês Moreira ◽  
Marta Ferreira ◽  
Ana Afonso ◽  
Ana Ferreira ◽  
Ana Rodrigues ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive

e13017 Background: Activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin intracellular signaling pathway is one of the mechanisms of endocrine resistance in breast cancer. The addition of everolimus to exemestane improves progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+) advanced breast cancer (ABC) previously treated with nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAIs). The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of everolimus plus exemestane in patients with HR+ ABC. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients with HR+, HER2 negative ABC treated with everolimus/exemestane that recurred or progressed during/after treatment with NSAIs in a portuguese comprehensive cancer center. Study endpoints were PFS, overall survival (OS), overall response rate and adverse events. Results: Between April 2014 and September 2020, 63 female patients were treated with everolimus/exemestane. Median age was 59 years (36-79), and all had performance status ECOG ≤2. Seventeen (27.0%) patients had bone metastasis alone, 39 (61.9%) had bone and visceral metastasis, 25 (39.7%) had metastasis in 3 or more sites and 87.3% had previous hormone-sensitive disease. Before everolimus/exemestane, 61 (96.8%) patients were being treated with palliative endocrine therapy (alone or in combination with CDK4/6 inhibitors) or chemotherapy (ChT) and 2 (3.2%) patients were under adjuvant endocrine therapy. Median follow-up time was 12.8 months (1.4-74.6), with 39 patients alive. Overall response rate was 14.3% (1 complete response and 8 partial responses) and 45 patients had stable disease. Median PFS was 5.6 months (CI95% 2.4-8.8) and median OS was 25.4 months (CI95% 10.3-40.5). Subgroup analysis regarding PFS was statistically significant for previous treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors (p = 0.026) and for site of metastasis (p = 0.025). In the subgroup of patients that previously underwent palliative ChT, median PFS was 4.0 months (CI95% 0.2-9.6) and median OS was 18.6 months (CI95% 8.2-29.0). For patients that did not receive previous palliative ChT, median PFS was 5.8 months (CI95% 3.8-7.8) and median OS was 43.5 months (CI95% 2.0-85.0). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurred in 21 (33.3%) patients, and were: nausea, anorexia, rash, headache, haematologic toxicity, hepatic cytolysis, hyperglycaemia, pneumonitis, oral mucositis and acute kidney failure with need for haemodialysis. Fifty-five (87.3%) patients suspended everolimus, 34 (54.0%) due to disease progression and 21 (33.3%) due to toxicity. Conclusions: Our results confirm the effectiveness and safety of everolimus/exemestane in real-world setting and support its use mainly before palliative ChT. Everolimus/exemestane in HR+ ABC is feasible in the clinic, with toxicity manageable under close surveillance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document