scholarly journals The University of Texas System Cancer Center M.D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute

Oncology ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-62
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Center ◽  
University Of Texas ◽  
The University

Radiologic-Pathologic Conferences of The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center

2006 ◽  
Vol 186 (2) ◽  
pp. 467-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumit Mehta ◽  
Janio Szklaruk ◽  
Silvana C. Faria ◽  
A. Kevin Raymond ◽  
Gary J. Whitman
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Center ◽  
University Of Texas ◽  
The University

Electronic Medical Records, HIPAA, and Patient Privacy

2011 ◽  
pp. 1795-1804
Author(s):  
Jingquan Li ◽  
Michael J. Shaw
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Medical Records ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Privacy Policy ◽  
Patient Privacy ◽  
Healthcare Organizations ◽  
Privacy And Security ◽  
University Of Texas ◽  
Healthcare It ◽  
The University

The continued growth of healthcare information systems (HCIS) promises to improve quality of care, lower costs, and streamline the entire healthcare system. But the resulting dependence on electronic medical records (EMRs) has also kindled patient concern about who has access to sensitive medical records. Healthcare organizations are obliged to protect patient records under HIPAA. The purpose of this study is to develop a formal privacy policy to protect the privacy and security of EMRs. This article describes the impact of EMRs and HIPAA on patient privacy in healthcare. It proposes access control and audit log policies to safeguard patient privacy. To illustrate the best practices in the healthcare industry, this article presents the case of the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. The case demonstrates that it is critical for a healthcare organization to have a privacy policy.

Program development of a preceptor bootcamp for operational pharmacy preceptors

2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S2-S7
Author(s):  
Devlin V Smith ◽  
Stefani Gautreaux ◽  
Alison M Gulbis ◽  
Jeffrey J Bruno ◽  
Kevin Garey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survey Methodology ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
University Of Texas ◽  
Qualitative Feedback ◽  
Md Anderson ◽  
The University ◽  
Functional Areas ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Purpose To describe the development, design, and implementation of a pilot preceptor development bootcamp and feedback related to its feasibility and impact on operational pharmacy preceptors. Summary The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center designed and implemented a pilot preceptor development bootcamp for operational staff pharmacists serving as residency preceptors for longitudinal weekend staffing experiences. A systematic, multipronged approach was taken to identify preceptor development gaps and design a full-day bootcamp curriculum. The resultant curriculum was comprised of content in major functional areas including using the 4 preceptor roles, documenting performance, giving and receiving feedback, and dealing with difficult situations or learners. The impact of the pilot preceptor development bootcamp was assessed using survey methodology and qualitative feedback from debrief discussions. Conclusion Implementation of a pilot preceptor bootcamp program addressing major areas of precepting skill was well received, resulted in positive feedback from operational pharmacy preceptors, and was feasible to implement at a large academic medical center.

Intracranial Hemangiopericytoma

Neurosurgery ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 624-631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amol J. Ghia ◽  
Eric L. Chang ◽  
Pamela K. Allen ◽  
Anita Mahajan ◽  
Marta Penas-Prado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Postoperative Radiotherapy ◽  
Extent Of Resection ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Subtotal Resection ◽  
University Of Texas ◽  
Institutional Experience ◽  
Unknown Status ◽  
Meningeal Hemangiopericytoma ◽  
The University

Abstract BACKGROUND: Meningeal hemangiopericytoma (M-HPC) is a rare entity. OBJECTIVE: To characterize our institutional experience in treating M-HPC. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients with M-HPC evaluated at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1979 and 2009. RESULTS: We identified 63 patients diagnosed between 1979 and 2009 with M-HPC treated with surgery alone or with postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). The majority were male (59%) and with a median age of 40.9 years (range, 0-71). Gross total resection (GTR) predominated (n = 31, 49%) followed by subtotal resection (n = 23, 37%) and unknown status (n = 9, 14.3%). PORT was delivered to 39 of the 63 patients (62%). The 5-, 10-, and 15-year overall survival were 90%, 68%, and 28%, respectively. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year local control (LC) were 70%, 37%, and 20%, respectively. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year metastasis-free survival were 85%, 39%, and 7%. PORT resulted in improved LC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.38, P = .008). Radiotherapy (RT) dose ≥60 Gy correlated with improved LC relative to <60 Gy (HR 0.12, P = .045). GTR correlated with improved LC (HR 0.40, P = .03). On multivariate analysis, PORT (HR 0.33, P = .003), GTR (HR = 0.33, P = .008), and RT dose ≥60 Gy (HR 0.33, P = .003) correlated with improved LC. Among those with GTR, PORT resulted in improved LC (HR 0.18, P = .027). Extent of resection and PORT did not correlate with improved overall survival. CONCLUSION: In M-HPC, both PORT and GTR independently correlate with improved LC. PORT improves LC following GTR. We recommend RT dose ≥60 Gy to optimize LC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document