Peritoneal Dialysis for Acute Kidney Injury: Techniques and Dose

2009 ◽  
pp. 278-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang Yin Chionh ◽  
Sachin Soni ◽  
Dinna N. Cruz ◽  
Claudio Ronco
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Kidney Injury

scholarly journals ISPD guidelines for peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury: 2020 Update (paediatrics)

2021 ◽  
pp. 089686082098212
Author(s):  
Peter Nourse ◽  
Brett Cullis ◽  
Fredrick Finkelstein ◽  
Alp Numanoglu ◽  
Bradley Warady ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Continuous Flow ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Minimum Standard ◽  
Acceptable Alternative ◽  
Dialysis Solution ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Dialysis Solutions

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) for acute kidney injury (AKI) in children has a long track record and shows similar outcomes when compared to extracorporeal therapies. It is still used extensively in low resource settings as well as in some high resource regions especially in Europe. In these regions, there is particular interest in the use of PD for AKI in post cardiac surgery neonates and low birthweight neonates. Here, we present the update of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis guidelines for PD in AKI in paediatrics. These guidelines extensively review the available literature and present updated recommendations regarding peritoneal access, dialysis solutions and prescription of dialysis. Summary of recommendations 1.1 Peritoneal dialysis is a suitable renal replacement therapy modality for treatment of acute kidney injury in children. (1C) 2. Access and fluid delivery for acute PD in children. 2.1 We recommend a Tenckhoff catheter inserted by a surgeon in the operating theatre as the optimal choice for PD access. (1B) (optimal) 2.2 Insertion of a PD catheter with an insertion kit and using Seldinger technique is an acceptable alternative. (1C) (optimal) 2.3 Interventional radiological placement of PD catheters combining ultrasound and fluoroscopy is an acceptable alternative. (1D) (optimal) 2.4 Rigid catheters placed using a stylet should only be used when soft Seldinger catheters are not available, with the duration of use limited to <3 days to minimize the risk of complications. (1C) (minimum standard) 2.5 Improvised PD catheters should only be used when no standard PD access is available. (practice point) (minimum standard) 2.6 We recommend the use of prophylactic antibiotics prior to PD catheter insertion. (1B) (optimal) 2.7 A closed delivery system with a Y connection should be used. (1A) (optimal) A system utilizing buretrols to measure fill and drainage volumes should be used when performing manual PD in small children. (practice point) (optimal) 2.8 In resource limited settings, an open system with spiking of bags may be used; however, this should be designed to limit the number of potential sites for contamination and ensure precise measurement of fill and drainage volumes. (practice point) (minimum standard) 2.9 Automated peritoneal dialysis is suitable for the management of paediatric AKI, except in neonates for whom fill volumes are too small for currently available machines. (1D) 3. Peritoneal dialysis solutions for acute PD in children 3.1 The composition of the acute peritoneal dialysis solution should include dextrose in a concentration designed to achieve the target ultrafiltration. (practice point) 3.2  Once potassium levels in the serum fall below 4 mmol/l, potassium should be added to dialysate using sterile technique. (practice point) (optimal) If no facilities exist to measure the serum potassium, consideration should be given for the empiric addition of potassium to the dialysis solution after 12 h of continuous PD to achieve a dialysate concentration of 3–4 mmol/l. (practice point) (minimum standard) 3.3  Serum concentrations of electrolytes should be measured 12 hourly for the first 24 h and daily once stable. (practice point) (optimal) In resource poor settings, sodium and potassium should be measured daily, if practical. (practice point) (minimum standard) 3.4  In the setting of hepatic dysfunction, hemodynamic instability and persistent/worsening metabolic acidosis, it is preferable to use bicarbonate containing solutions. (1D) (optimal) Where these solutions are not available, the use of lactate containing solutions is an alternative. (2D) (minimum standard) 3.5  Commercially prepared dialysis solutions should be used. (1C) (optimal) However, where resources do not permit this, locally prepared fluids may be used with careful observation of sterile preparation procedures and patient outcomes (e.g. rate of peritonitis). (1C) (minimum standard) 4. Prescription of acute PD in paediatric patients 4.1 The initial fill volume should be limited to 10–20 ml/kg to minimize the risk of dialysate leakage; a gradual increase in the volume to approximately 30–40 ml/kg (800–1100 ml/m2) may occur as tolerated by the patient. (practice point) 4.2 The initial exchange duration, including inflow, dwell and drain times, should generally be every 60–90 min; gradual prolongation of the dwell time can occur as fluid and solute removal targets are achieved. In neonates and small infants, the cycle duration may need to be reduced to achieve adequate ultrafiltration. (practice point) 4.3 Close monitoring of total fluid intake and output is mandatory with a goal to achieve and maintain normotension and euvolemia. (1B) 4.4 Acute PD should be continuous throughout the full 24-h period for the initial 1–3 days of therapy. (1C) 4.5  Close monitoring of drug dosages and levels, where available, should be conducted when providing acute PD. (practice point) 5. Continuous flow peritoneal dialysis (CFPD) 5.1   Continuous flow peritoneal dialysis can be considered as a PD treatment option when an increase in solute clearance and ultrafiltration is desired but cannot be achieved with standard acute PD. Therapy with this technique should be considered experimental since experience with the therapy is limited. (practice point) 5.2  Continuous flow peritoneal dialysis can be considered for dialysis therapy in children with AKI when the use of only very small fill volumes is preferred (e.g. children with high ventilator pressures). (practice point)

Use of Peritoneal Dialysis in Acute Kidney Injury: How Far Away?

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 506-515
Author(s):  
Zhikai Yang ◽  
Jie Dong ◽  
Li Yang
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Kidney Injury

scholarly journals PERITONEAL DIALYSIS IN TREATMENT FOR PATIENTS WITH ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY

2017 ◽  
pp. 58-64
Author(s):  
M. Kolesnyk ◽  
N. Stepanova
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Renal Replacement Therapy ◽  
Continuous Flow ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Dialysis Dose ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Coagulation Abnormalities ◽  
In Infants And Children

This article is a review of the literature. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) was the first method of dialysis renal replacement therapy (DRRT), used for the treatment of patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). PD is able to correct metabolic, electrolyte, acid-alkali disorders and hypervolemia in patients with AKI. Continuous equilibration PD and continuous flow PD can provide of dialysis dose compared with extracorporeal methods of DRRT. However, PD is considered less effective than hemodialysis. In this regard, PD has used in patients with AKI, especially those who are hemodynamically unstable or at risk of bleeding because of severe coagulation abnormalities, in infants and children with AKI, and in patients with circulatory failure.

scholarly journals ISPD guidelines for peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury: 2020 Update (paediatrics)

KIDNEYS ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 176-178
Author(s):  
Peter Nourse ◽  
Brett Cullis ◽  
Fredrick Finkelstein ◽  
Alp Numanoglu ◽  
Bradley Warady ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Kidney Injury

No abstract

Vancomycin Removal during High-Volume Peritoneal Dialysis in Acute Kidney Injury Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Ponce ◽  
Welder Zamoner ◽  
Fernanda Moreira Freitas ◽  
André Balbi ◽  
Linda Awdishu
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Body Weight ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Total Body Weight ◽  
Empirical Treatment ◽  
Total Body

Studies on vancomycin pharmacokinetics in acute kidney injury (AKI) patients on high-volume peritoneal dialysis (HVPD) are lacking. We studied the pharmacokinetics of intravenous (IV) vancomycin in AKI patients treated by HVPD who received a prescribed single IV dose of vancomycin (15 - 20 mg/kg total body weight) to determine the extent of vancomycin removal and to establish vancomycin dosing guidelines for the empirical treatment of AKI patients receiving HVPD. The application of 18 mg/kg vancomycin every 48 - 72 hours in AKI patients undergoing HVPD was required to maintain therapeutic concentrations.

Continuous Peritoneal Dialysis Compared with Daily Hemodialysis in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 62-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Ponce Gabriel ◽  
Jacqueline Teixeira Caramori ◽  
Luis Cuadrado Martin ◽  
Pasqual Barretti ◽  
Andre Luis Balbi
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Acute Tubular Necrosis ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Acid Base ◽  
Tubular Necrosis ◽  
Daily Hemodialysis ◽  
Continuous Peritoneal Dialysis

Background In some parts of the world, peritoneal dialysis is widely used for renal replacement therapy (RRT) in acute kidney injury (AKI), despite concerns about its inadequacy. It has been replaced in recent years by hemodialysis and, most recently, by continuous venovenous therapies. We performed a prospective study to determine the effect of continuous peritoneal dialysis (CPD), as compared with daily hemodialysis (dHD), on survival among patients with AKI. Methods A total of 120 patients with acute tubular necrosis (ATN) were assigned to receive CPD or dHD in a tertiary-care university hospital. The primary endpoint was hospital survival rate; renal function recovery and metabolic, acid–base, and fluid controls were secondary endpoints. Results Of the 120 patients, 60 were treated with CPD (G1) and 60 with dHD (G2). The two groups were similar at the start of RRT with respect to age (64.2 ± 19.8 years vs 62.5 ± 21.2 years), sex (men: 72% vs 66%), sepsis (42% vs 47%), shock (61% vs 63%), severity of AKI [Acute Tubular Necrosis Individual Severity Score (ATNISS): 0.68 ± 0.2 vs 0.66 ± 0.22; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II: 26.9 ± 8.9 vs 24.1 ± 8.2], pre-dialysis blood urea nitrogen [BUN (116.4 ± 33.6 mg/dL vs 112.6 ± 36.8 mg/dL)], and creatinine (5.85 ± 1.9 mg/dL vs 5.95 ± 1.4 mg/dL). In G1, weekly delivered Kt/V was 3.59 ± 0.61, and in G2, it was 4.76 ± 0.65 ( p < 0.01). The two groups were similar in metabolic and acid–base control (after 4 sessions, BUN < 55 mg/dL: 46 ± 18.7 mg/dL vs 52 ± 18.2 mg/dL; pH: 7.41 vs 7.38; bicarbonate: 22.8 ± 8.9 mEq/L vs 22.2 ± 7.1 mEq/L). Duration of therapy was longer in G2 (5.5 days vs 7.5 days; p = 0.02). Despite the delivery of different dialysis methods and doses, the survival rate did not differ between the groups (58% in G1 vs 52% in G2), and recovery of renal function was similar (28% vs 26%). Conclusion High doses of CPD provided appropriate metabolic and pH control, with a rate of survival and recovery of renal function similar to that seen with dHD. Therefore, CPD can be considered an alternative to other forms of RRT in AKI.

scholarly journals Peritoneal dialysis for acute kidney injury: Equations for dosing in pandemics, disasters, and beyond

2020 ◽  
pp. 089686082097006
Author(s):  
Chang Yin Chionh ◽  
Fredric O Finkelstein ◽  
Claudio Ronco
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Cycle Duration ◽  
Weekly Dose ◽  
Target Dose ◽  
Primary Determinant ◽  
Total Body ◽  
Dialysate Volume

Background: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a viable option for renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury (AKI), especially in challenging times during disasters and pandemics when resources are limited. While PD techniques are well described, there is uncertainty about how to determine the amount of PD to be prescribed toward a target dose. The aim of this study is to derive practical equations to assist with the prescription of PD for AKI. Methods: Using established physiological principles behind PD clearance and membrane transport, a primary determinant of dose delivery, equations were mathematically derived to estimate dialysate volume required to achieve a target dose of PD. Results: The main derivative equation is VD = (1.2 × std- Kt/ V × TBW)/( t dwell + 4), where VD is the total dialysate volume per day, std- Kt/ V is the desired weekly dose, TBW is the total body water, and t dwell is the dwell time. VD can be expressed in terms of dwell volume, v dwell, by VD = (0.3 × std- Kt/ V × TBW) − (6 × v dwell). Two further equations were derived which directly describe the mathematical relationship between t dwell and v dwell. A calculator is included as an Online Supplementary Material. Conclusions: The equations are intended as a practical tool to estimate solute clearances and guide prescription of continuous PD. The estimated dialysate volume required for any dose target can be calculated from cycle duration or dwell volume. However, the exact target dose of PD is uncertain and should be adjusted according to the clinical circumstances and response to treatment. The equations presented in this article facilitate the adjustment of PD prescription toward the targeted solute clearance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document