Effects of Low-Dose ‘Factor VIII Inhibitor Bypassing Activity (FEIBA)’ in Resistant Haemophilia

1980 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo Zwahlen ◽  
Eugene A. Beck
Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4656-4656
Author(s):  
Ratesh Khillan ◽  
Rabia Latif ◽  
Gurinder Sidhu ◽  
Elizabeth Gloster ◽  
Albert S. Braverman ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4656 A 91-year-old woman with past medical history of hypertension presented with hematuria. There were no ecchymosis, Petechiae or other obvious active bleeding. Her hemoglobin was 11.4 g/dl on presentation hematuria got worse and her hemoglobin drops to 7.6 g/dl over next 48 hours and she was hemodynamically unstable. She was transferred to the Medical Intensive Care Unit for resuscitation with IV fluids and PRBCs. Coagulation tests revealed a prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time of more than 100 seconds (control 33 seconds) which could not be corrected with mixing normal plasma. Diagnosis of acquired factor VIII inhibitor was considered and recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) was initiated. The factor VIII activity level was reduced to less than 1%. Bethesda assay demonstrated the presence of a factor VIII inhibitor at 103.8 Bethesda units per ml (BU/ml), other coagulation studies were with in normal range. CT scan of her abdomen showed retroperitoneal hematoma. rFVIIa was started at 50 units/kg body weight every 3 hours and subsequently increased to 200 units/kg. She was simultaneously started on steroids. Her hematuria did not improve in spite of high dose rFVIIa. On day 4 rFVIIa was tapered and switched to 50 units/kg FEIBA (Factor eight inhibitor bypass agent). She also received Rituximab 375 mg/m2. We continued FEIBA until day 7 but her hematuria did not improve, she required more than 10 units of Packed Red Blood Cells PRBCs during this period. On day 7 we decided to start plasmapheresis as there were some case reports of using plasmapheresis with or without immunoadsorption columns (which are currently not available in US). We started plasmapheresis and gave her 2 doses of IVIG (Immunoglobulin). Her pre and post plasmapheresis inhibitor levels were 104 BU/ml and 54 BU/ml respectively. Her urine turned pink and her Prbc demand decreased. A second plasmapheresis was done 2 days later showed significant decrease of inhibitor level from 80 BU/ml to 14.5 BU/ml. Her hematuria resolved by next day. We continued her on FEIBA for three more days she did not have hematuria and she did not require any PRBCs. CT scan of abdomen showed decrease in size of retroperitoneal hematoma. Cyclophosphamide 1000 mg was given for induction of immune tolerance followed by high dose factor VIII (100 IU/KG) as per Bonn protocol. Her factor VIII levels and factor VIII inhibitor levels were checked every day before and after Factor VIII infusion. Her inhibitor level is ranging between 14–16 BU/ml she is not bleeding any more and her abdominal hematoma is resolved. Her pre and post transfusion factor VIII levels ranges between 30–40% and 120–140%. respectively. Patient is still getting factor VIII everyday. Role of plasmapheresis is not very well defined in acquired Factor VIII inhibitor patients. Acquired hemophilia is a rare autoimmune disorder in which the patient develop an autoantibody directed against coagulation factor VIII leading to a clinically bleeding diathesis. There are few case reports in literature showing efficacy of Plasmapheresis in this disorder. This is a rare condition and it is very difficult to find large randomized trial to establish a standard of care. Patient mentioned above did not respond to rFVIIa or FEIBA. In our observation plasmapheresis with IVIG proved to be an effective method of rapidly reducing the inhibitor level. In case of life threatening bleeding we need to reduce the inhibitor level quickly. We also observed that once inhibitor level was low bleeding stopped. Immune induction therapy with cyclophosphamide followed by high dose factor VIII was successful in maintaining low inhibitor level. Disclosures: Kessler: Grifols S.A.: Research Funding.


2012 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yujuan Gao ◽  
Shuchuan Liu ◽  
Guibo Ma ◽  
Linlin Lv ◽  
Yanhua Su

Haematologica ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 521-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Wermke ◽  
M. von Bonin ◽  
S. Gehrisch ◽  
G. Siegert ◽  
G. Ehninger ◽  
...  

1981 ◽  
Vol 45 (03) ◽  
pp. 285-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
J P Allain ◽  
A Gaillandre ◽  
D Frommel

SummaryFactor VIII complex and its interaction with antibodies to factor VIII have been studied in 17 non-haemophilic patients with factor VIII inhibitor. Low VIII:C and high VIIIR.Ag levels were found in all patients. VIII:WF levels were 50% of those of VTIIRrAg, possibly related to an increase of poorly aggregated and electrophoretically fast moving VIIIR:Ag oligomers.Antibody function has been characterized by kinetics of VIII :C inactivation, saturability by normal plasma and the slope of the affinity curve. Two major patterns were observed:1) Antibodies from 6 patients behaved similarly to those from haemophiliacs by showing second order inhibition kinetics, easy saturability and steep affinity slope (> 1).2) Antibodies from other patients, usually with lower titres, inactivated VIII :C according to complex order kinetics, were not saturable, and had a less steep affinity slope (< 0.7). In native plasma, or after mixing with factor VIII concentrate, antibodies of the second group did not form immune complexes with the whole factor VIII molecular complex. However, dissociation procedures did release some antibodies from apparently low molecular weight complexes formed in vivo or in vitro. For appropriate management of non-haemophilic patients with factor VIII inhibitor, it is important to determine the functional properties of their antibodies to factor VIII.


1993 ◽  
Vol 69 (02) ◽  
pp. 115-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathelijne Peerlinck ◽  
Jef Arnout ◽  
Jean Guy Gilles ◽  
Jean-Marie Saint-Remy ◽  
Jos Vermylen

SummaryIn May 1990, 218 patients with haemophilia A regularly attending the Leuven Haemophilia Center were randomly assigned to a group receiving either of two newly introduced factor VIII concentrates: factor VIII-P, an intermediate purity pasteurized concentrate, or factor VIII-SD, a high purity concentrate treated with solvent-detergent for viral inactivation.Patients were followed from May 1990 until October 1991. Between August 1991 and October 1991 a clinically important factor VIII inhibitor was detected in five out of the 109 patients receiving factor VIII-P while none of the 109 patients receiving factor VIII-SD developed such antibodies. All patients acquiring an inhibitor had previously been clinically tolerant to transfused factor VIII with 200 to more than 1,000 days of exposure to factor VIII prior to May 1990. Patients with inhibitors were transfused daily with 30 U factor VIII-SD per kg body weight, which was associated with a gradual decline of the inhibitor level. In all patients the antibodies were relatively slow-acting and predominantly directed towards the light chain of factor VIII.This study demonstrates a higher than expected incidence of factor VIII inhibitors associated with the use of a specific factor VIII concentrate in multitransfused haemophilia A patients. It indicates the usefulness of evaluating newly introduced concentrates in prospective, randomized trials.


1979 ◽  
Vol 42 (05) ◽  
pp. 1355-1367 ◽  
Author(s):  
C V Prowse ◽  
A Chirnside ◽  
R A Elton

SummaryVarious factor IX concentrates have been examined in a number of in vitro tests of thrombogenicity. The results suggest that some tests are superfluous as in concentrates with activity in any of these tests activation is revealed by a combination of the non-activated partial thromboplastin time, the thrombin (or Xa) generation time and factor VIII inhibitor bypassing activity tests. Assay of individual coagulant enzymes revealed that most concentrates contained more factor IXa than Xa. However only a small number of concentrates, chiefly those that had been purposefully activated, contained appreciable amounts of either enzyme.


2003 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahide YAMAGUCHI ◽  
Mamoru KOHDA ◽  
Hiroaki UEKI ◽  
Wataru FUJIMOTO

1975 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. G. D. Tuddenham ◽  
A. L. Bloom ◽  
J. C. Giddings ◽  
C. A. Barrett

The occurrence of factor VIII inhibitor in five mild or moderately affected liaemophilic patients is described. In four patients the inhibitor inactivated endogenous factor VIII an dtemporarily converted them to severely affected haemophiliacs with factor VIII level of 0%. In the fifth patient, a brother of one of the others, the inhibitor although more potent did not inactivate the patient’s own factor VIII and did not completely inactivate normal factor VIII in vitro. This patient responded to treatment with factor-VIII concentrate but the in-vivo recovery was reduced. The patient’s plasma was tested against a panel of normal donors but it inactivated factor VIII in each to a similar extent and no evidence for normal factor-VIII groups was obtained. In the other patients the response to replacement treatment was also better than that usually seen in severely affected haemophilic patients with inhibitor. In the two related patients the inhibitors have so far persisted but in the unrelated patients the inhibitors eventually disappeared and did not always recur with subsequent therapy. The incidence of factor- VIII inhibitor in less severe haemophiliacs (factor VIII > 3% ) in this centre is 6% suggesting that the complication is more frequent in this type of patient than hitherto recognised.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document