The Basic Documentation for Psycho-Oncology (PO-Bado) – an Expert Rating Scale for the Psychosocial Experience of Cancer Patients

2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 591-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Herschbach ◽  
Katrin Book ◽  
Tobias Brandl ◽  
Monika Keller ◽  
Birgitt Marten-Mittag
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Expert Rating ◽  
Basic Documentation

scholarly journals Psychological distress in cancer patients assessed with an expert rating scale

2008 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Herschbach ◽  
K Book ◽  
T Brandl ◽  
M Keller ◽  
G Lindena ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Distress ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Expert Rating

scholarly journals Correction to: Psychosocial distress in acute cancer patients assessed with an expert rating scale

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 2433-2433
Author(s):  
Bianca Senf ◽  
Holger Brandt ◽  
Axel Dignass ◽  
Rolf Kleinschmidt ◽  
Jochen Kaiser
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Psychosocial Distress ◽  
Expert Rating

scholarly journals Psychosocial distress in acute cancer patients assessed with an expert rating scale

2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 957-965 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bianca Senf ◽  
Holger Brandt ◽  
Axel Dignass ◽  
Rolf Kleinschmidt ◽  
Jochen Kaiser
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Psychological Treatment ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Treatment Phase ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Psychosocial Distress ◽  
Self Rating ◽  
Expert Rating

Abstract Purpose The identification of psychosocial stress in cancer patients has remained a challenging task especially in an acute care environment. The aims of the present study were to apply a short expert rating scale for the assessment of distress during the acute treatment phase and to identify potential sociodemographic and disease-related predictors. Methods Four hundred seventy-eight ward cancer patients were assessed with the short form of the psycho-oncological basis documentation and its breast-cancer-specific version. In addition, they completed a self-rating questionnaire on stress in cancer patients. We recorded sociodemographic and disease-related variables and assessed their predictive value for psychosocial distress. Results According to the expert rating scale, 56.3% of patients were rated distressed. While only 31.3% of patients were classified as distressed according to a patient self-rating, both approaches showed a good degree of concurrence with a consistent classification of 69% of patients. Younger age, current psychotropic medication, and past psychological treatment were associated with higher distress levels. Patients with metastases and those with a poorer functional status were more distressed. Interestingly, having an operation was associated with a better psychological well-being. Conclusions This study demonstrated that a substantial proportion of cancer patients in acute care are psychosocially distressed. A short expert rating scale proved to be a feasible tool for the assessment of distress in an acute care setting.

scholarly journals Erratum to: Psychosocial distress in acute cancer patients assessed with an expert rating scale

2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 967-967
Author(s):  
Bianca Senf ◽  
Holger Brandt ◽  
Axel Dignass ◽  
Rolf Kleinschmidt ◽  
Jochen Kaiser
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Psychosocial Distress ◽  
Expert Rating

The Basic Documentation for Psycho-Oncology Short Form (PO-Bado SF)-an expert rating scale for distress screening: development and psychometric properties

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 653-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birgitt Marten-Mittag ◽  
Katrin Book ◽  
Britta Buchhold ◽  
Andreas Dinkel ◽  
Bärbel Gründobler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Distress Screening ◽  
Expert Rating ◽  
Basic Documentation

Implementation of Guidance nuanced Learning Model at MAN 1 Bandar Lampung

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-52
Author(s):  
Rifda El Fiah ◽  
Saiful Bahri
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Formal Education ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Soft Skills ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Expert Rating ◽  
Hard Skills ◽  
Process Implementation

This research was conducted based on the problems that often arise in formal education learning. This problem has an impact on learning achievement results obtained by students. This research was conducted at MAN 1 Bandar Lampung. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of the instructional model nuanced guidance data collection techniques using expert rating scale and user rating scale. The results of this study indicate that the nuanced learning model meets the achievement of student learning outcomes in MAN 1 Bandar Lampung, by developing students' knowledge and skills in the form of soft skills and hard skills. Guidance nuanced learning model design consists of learning process planning standards, learning process implementation standards, learning process outcome standards, and learning process control standards. 

scholarly journals French adaptation of the PO-Bado short form, an interview-based expert rating scale for distress screening

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-89
Author(s):  
Yaël Saada ◽  
Kamel Gana ◽  
Odile Duguey-Cachet ◽  
Nena Stadelmaier ◽  
Bruno Quintard
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Distress Screening ◽  
Expert Rating
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document