scholarly journals Ectopic Varices and Collaterals Development after Band Ligation Treatment in a Patient with Portal Hypertension

2008 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 380-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Louis Frossard ◽  
Mariam Seirafi ◽  
Laurent Spahr
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Band Ligation ◽  
Ectopic Varices

scholarly journals Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Cirrhotic Patients with Portal Hypertension

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erwin Biecker
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Gastric Varices ◽  
Portal Hypertensive Gastropathy ◽  
Pharmacologic Treatment ◽  
Esophageal Variceal ◽  
Esophageal Variceal Bleeding ◽  
Band Ligation ◽  
Ectopic Varices

Gastrointestinal bleeding related to portal hypertension is a serious complication in patients with liver cirrhosis. Most patients bleed from esophageal or gastric varices, but bleeding from ectopic varices or portal hypertensive gastropathy is also possible. The management of acute bleeding has changed over the last years. Patients are managed with a combination of endoscopic and pharmacologic treatment. The endoscopic treatment of choice for esophageal variceal bleeding is variceal band ligation. Bleeding from gastric varices is treated by injection with cyanoacrylate. Treatment with vasoactive drugs as well as antibiotic treatment is started before or at the time point of endoscopy. The first-line treatment for primary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal bleeding is nonselective beta blockers. Pharmacologic therapy is recommended for most patients; band ligation is an alternative in patients with contraindications for or intolerability of beta blockers. Treatment options for secondary prophylaxis include variceal band ligation, beta blockers, a combination of nitrates and beta blockers, and combination of band ligation and pharmacologic treatment. A clear superiority of one treatment over the other has not been shown. Bleeding from portal hypertensive gastropathy or ectopic varices is less common. Treatment options include beta blocker therapy, injection therapy, and interventional radiology.

Covered TIPS versus endoscopic band ligation plus propranolol for the prevention of variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis: a randomised controlled trial

Gut ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 67 (12) ◽  
pp. 2156-2168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Lv ◽  
Xingshun Qi ◽  
Chuangye He ◽  
Zhengyu Wang ◽  
Zhanxin Yin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Portal Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Decompensated Cirrhosis ◽  
Covered Stents ◽  
Band Ligation ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Cirrhotic Patients ◽  
Endoscopic Band Ligation

ObjectiveLimited data are available on the prevention of variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT). This study aimed to compare transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with covered stents versus endoscopic band ligation (EBL) plus propranolol for the prevention of variceal rebleeding among patients with cirrhosis and PVT.DesignConsecutive cirrhotic patients (94% Child-Pugh class A or B) with PVT who had variceal bleeding in the past 6 weeks were randomly assigned to TIPS group (n=24) or EBL plus propranolol group (EBL+drug, n=25), respectively. Primary endpoint was variceal rebleeding. Secondary endpoints included survival, overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE), portal vein recanalisation and rethrombosis, other complications of portal hypertension and adverse events.ResultsDuring a median follow-up of 30 months in both groups, variceal rebleeding was significantly less frequent in the TIPS group (15% vs 45% at 1 year and 25% vs 50% at 2 years, respectively; HR=0.28, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.76, p=0.008), with a significantly higher portal vein recanalisation rate (95% vs 70%; p=0.03) and a relatively lower rethrombosis rate (5% vs 33%; p=0.06) compared with the EBL+drug group. There were no statistically significant differences in survival (67% vs 84%; p=0.152), OHE (25% vs 16%; p=0.440), other complications of portal hypertension and adverse events between groups.ConclusionCovered TIPS placement in patients with PVT and moderately decompensated cirrhosis was more effective than EBL combined with propranolol for the prevention of rebleeding, with a higher probability of PVT resolution without increasing the risk of OHE and adverse effects, but this benefit did not translate into improved survival.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01326949.

scholarly journals Endovascular and Percutaneous Treatment of Pediatric Portosystemic Varices: A Case Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 03 (03) ◽  
pp. 214-226
Author(s):  
Alexander Dabrowiecki ◽  
Eric J. Monroe ◽  
Rene Romero ◽  
Anne E. Gill ◽  
C. Matthew Hawkins
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Small Bowel ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Percutaneous Treatment ◽  
Roux Limb ◽  
Case Review ◽  
Gastroesophageal Varices ◽  
Ectopic Varices

AbstractPortal hypertension is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric patients. Complications of portal hypertension include development of portosystemic varices. The most common type of portosystemic varices are gastroesophageal varices; however, other ectopic varices can also be a cause of recurrent, life-threatening gastrointestinal bleeding. Problematic ectopic varices include isolated gastric, anorectal, small bowel, roux-limb, and stomal varices. There are no standardized treatment guidelines on how to manage ectopic varices in children; however, new innovations in endovascular treatment options provide potential therapeutic alternatives when varices are refractory to conventional therapy. This review provides a case-based literature review for endovascular treatment of isolated gastric, anorectal, small bowel, roux-limb, and stomal ectopic varices in children (age 0-9 years) and adolescents (age 10-19 years).

Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound to Assess and Manage Portal Hypertension

2020 ◽  
Vol 04 (02) ◽  
pp. 103-109
Author(s):  
Sidhant Singh ◽  
Saurabh Mukewar
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Gastrointestinal Tract ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Portal Pressure ◽  
Pressure Measurements ◽  
Vascular Changes ◽  
Ectopic Varices ◽  
Portal Venography ◽  
Intrahepatic Shunt

AbstractPortal hypertension leads to the development of varices along the gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopy plays an important role in the diagnosis and management of varices. Endosonography (EUS) enables visualization and permits access to varices and veins outside the gastrointestinal tract. EUS has emerged as an important tool, with the ability to identify vascular changes, treat gastric and ectopic varices, perform portal pressure measurements, portal venography, and intrahepatic shunt placement. This review discusses the role of endoscopy and the emerging role of EUS in evaluation and management of portal hypertension.

scholarly journals A73 PHARYNGEAL VARICES AS A COMPLICATION OF PORTAL HYPERTENSION: A CASE SERIES

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 86-88
Author(s):  
J Ghaith ◽  
P James ◽  
F Wong
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Splenic Vein ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Brachiocephalic Vein ◽  
Splenic Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Ectopic Varices ◽  
Collateral Vessels

Abstract Background One of the complications of portal hypertension, with or without the presence of cirrhosis, is the development of varices along the length of the gastrointestinal tract. The commonest sites are along the esophagus or in the stomach. Ectopic varices in the small and large bowels can also be observed, but ectopic varices in the pharynx are extremely uncommon. Aims To present a case series and review the literature regarding pharyngeal varcies. Methods - Results Three elderly female patients presented for esophagogastric varices surveillance gastroscopy were diagnosed with pharyngeal varices. One patient has hepatitis C cirrhosis, while the other two non-cirrhotic patients have myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN). None of the patients had thromboses of the portal vein or its tributaries. All three patient have concomitant esophageal varices, but only one required band ligation of her esophageal varices. All patients are asymptotic except for mild dysphagia. No patient has bled from their pharyngeal varices to date. Two patients have had prophylactic treatment of their portal hypertension with non-selective beta blocker (NSBB), while the third one has not received NSBB prophylaxis because of her age. Conclusions Pharyngeal varices are extremely rare. To date, there are three case reports in the literature, however, we have been able to identify three cases in our practice. The previous two cases reported possible left-sided portal hypertension with splenic vein thrombosis, leading to the development of collateral vessels including a gastrocaval shunt, which by some contiguous route connects to the brachiocephalic vein; and a third case was a complication of neck dissection surgery. In our case series, none of our patients had splenic vein thrombosis. However, none of them has had a careful CT angiogram to delineate the portal vein tributaries and the collateral vessels, which may further help to define their pathogenesis. It is unclear whether NSBB would be effective as primary prophylaxis against their bleeding, The plan is to continue to monitor these patients to learn about the natural history of these pharyngeal varices. Funding Agencies None

scholarly journals A174 RARE BUT DEADLY: AN APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT OF DUODENAL VARICEAL HEMORRHAGE

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 39-41
Author(s):  
M Dahiya ◽  
M Tomaszewski ◽  
G Ou ◽  
A Ramji
Keyword(s):  
Interventional Radiology ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Variceal Bleeding ◽  
Variceal Hemorrhage ◽  
Cyanoacrylate Glue ◽  
Duodenal Varices ◽  
Ectopic Varices

Abstract Background Common etiologies of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension include gastroesophageal varices (GOV), portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) and gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE). Less commonly, patients with portal hypertension develop varices in ectopic sites, including the rectum, biliary tree and duodenum. Ectopic varices are rare, contributing to 1–5% of all variceal bleeding, of which 17% is from duodenal varices. Aims To describe the management of duodenal variceal hemorrhage. Methods A case report and literature review was performed. Results Case report: We present a case of recurrent UGIB in a 59-year-old male with decompensated cirrhosis due to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (CP-C; Meld 14). Initial endoscopy was negative for GOV, peptic ulcer, PHG, and GAVE, but an erosion over a mucosal bulge in the third segment of the duodenum was identified, raising possibility of vascular malformation versus ectopic varix. There was active bleeding after water provocation, so clips were deployed for hemostasis. CT imaging showed mesenteric venous collaterals abutting the duodenum, again raising possibility of duodenal varix, which was ultimately confirmed by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Patient had recurrent overt bleeding despite beta-blockage for prophylaxis, endoscopic clipping on four separate occasions, attempted angioembolization by interventional radiology, and cyanoacrylate glue. Transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt (TIPS) was not possible due to portal vein occlusion, so he underwent EUS-guided cyanoacrylate glue a second time. Literature review: Ectopic varices are rare, contributing to 1–5% of all variceal bleeding, of which 17% is from duodenal varices. Duodenal variceal hemorrhage can lead to hemorrhagic shock, and is potentially life threatening, with quoted mortality rates of 40%. Unfortunately, duodenal varices can be difficult to identify. Diagnosis is often delayed due to a combination of lower awareness and endoscopic challenges given the unusual serosal and submucosal location. Evidence-based guidelines for the management of ectopic varices are limited. For this reason, our current management strategies rely heavily on local expertise. Splanchnic vasoconstrictor medication, endoscopic ligation, EUS guided gluing, interventional radiology guided embolization, TIPS, balloon retrograde transvenous obliteration and surgical shunts are potential therapeutic options to manage the acutely bleeding varix. Following a variceal bleed, liver transplantation should be considered in eligible patients with no other contraindications. Conclusions Duodenal varices are a rare, potentially fatal, and underrecognized cause of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with portal hypertension. Definitive therapy currently relies upon local expertise in the absence of clear guideline-based therapy. Funding Agencies None

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the treatment of ectopic varices secondary to portal hypertension

2003 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. A665
Author(s):  
Ramasamy Saravanan ◽  
Manu Nayar ◽  
Peter Rowlands ◽  
Richard Mc Williams ◽  
Howard Smart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt ◽  
Portosystemic Shunt ◽  
Ectopic Varices ◽  
Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt

scholarly journals Evaluation of endoscopic secondary prophylaxis in children and adolescents with esophageal varices

2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Júlio Rocha PIMENTA ◽  
Alexandre Rodrigues FERREIRA ◽  
Eleonora Druve Tavares FAGUNDES ◽  
Paulo Fernando Souto BITTENCOURT ◽  
Alice Mendes MOURA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Secondary Prophylaxis ◽  
Gastric Fundus ◽  
Portal Hypertensive Gastropathy ◽  
Band Ligation ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Bleeding of esophageal varices is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in children and adults with portal hypertension and there are few studies involving secondary prophylaxis in children and adolescents. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic secondary prophylaxis in prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in children and adolescents with esophageal varices. METHODS This is a prospective analysis of 85 patients less than 18 years of age with or without cirrhosis, with portal hypertension. Participants underwent endoscopic secondary prophylaxis with sclerotherapy or band ligation. Eradication of varices, incidence of rebleeding, number of endoscopic sessions required for eradication, incidence of developing gastric fundus varices and portal hypertensive gastropathy were evaluated. RESULTS Band ligation was performed in 34 (40%) patients and sclerotherapy in 51 (60%) patients. Esophageal varices were eradicated in 81.2%, after a median of four endoscopic sessions. Varices relapsed in 38 (55.1%) patients. Thirty-six (42.3%) patients experienced rebleeding, and it was more prevalent in the group that received sclerotherapy. Gastric varices and portal hypertensive gastropathy developed in 38.7% and 57.9% of patients, respectively. Patients undergoing band ligation showed lower rebleeding rates (26.5% vs 52.9%) and fewer sessions required for eradication of esophageal varices (3.5 vs 5). CONCLUSION Secondary prophylaxis was effective in eradicating esophageal varices and controlling new upper gastrointestinal bleeding episodes due to the rupture of esophageal varices. Band ligation seems that resulted in lower rebleeding rates and fewer sessions required to eradicate varices than did sclerotherapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document