Effects of Oral Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol on Operant Reinforcement Schedule Performance in Rats

Pharmacology ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas P. Ferraro ◽  
John P. Gluck
Keyword(s):  
Reinforcement Schedule ◽  
Operant Reinforcement ◽  
Schedule Performance

The role of timing in reinforcement schedule performance

1991 ◽  
Vol 22 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 200-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.E.R Staddon ◽  
C.D.L Wynne ◽  
J.J Higa
Keyword(s):  
Reinforcement Schedule ◽  
Schedule Performance

Selective Action of Pentobarbital on Component Behaviors of a Reinforcement Schedule

Science ◽  
1956 ◽  
Vol 124 (3217) ◽  
pp. 367-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. HERRNSTEIN ◽  
W. H. MORSE
Keyword(s):  
Reinforcement Schedule ◽  
Selective Action

Concurrent schedule performance in domestic goats: persistent undermatching

1997 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.Mary Foster ◽  
Lindsay R. Matthews ◽  
William Temple ◽  
Alan Poling
Keyword(s):  
Concurrent Schedule ◽  
Schedule Performance

“Freeloading” in a Runway as a Function of Amount of Training and Type of Reinforcement Schedule

1968 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 211-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Calvin M. Leung ◽  
Glen D. Jensen ◽  
Richard P. Tapley
Keyword(s):  
Reinforcement Schedule ◽  
Schedule Of Reinforcement ◽  
Single Pellet ◽  
Skinner Box

2 groups of 60 rats received either 75 or 285 runs in a runway before being given a choice between freeloading from a dish of pellets in the start box or running the maze for a single pellet. The 285-trial Ss showed less willingness to perform the operant than the 75-trial Ss. This is opposite to what Jensen (1963) had found in the Skinner box. Schedule of reinforcement (100 vs 50%) during training did not significantly affect freeloading scores.

Noncontingent Nonreinforcement of a Response as the Aversive Event in a Cer Paradigm

1971 ◽  
Vol 29 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1196-1198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard S. Calef ◽  
Richard A. Kaufman ◽  
Ronald N. Bone ◽  
Steven A. Werk
Keyword(s):  
Reinforcement Schedule ◽  
Present Experiment ◽  
High Density ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Aversive Event ◽  
Necessary Condition ◽  
Facilitation Effect ◽  
Response Facilitation ◽  
Early Training ◽  
Low Rate

The present experiment investigated the effects of noncontingent nonreinforcement as the aversive event in a CER paradigm. The results showed a significant response-facilitation effect during early training, but none during later training with a high rate-producing, high-density reinforcement schedule. The present results imply that a low rate-producing, high-density reinforcement schedule is not a necessary condition for response facilitation.

Effects of clonidine on progressive ratio schedule performance in Fmr1 knockout mice

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craige C. Wrenn ◽  
Eric French ◽  
Dustin Baker ◽  
Randall McCallian ◽  
Ryan Kirk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knockout Mice ◽  
Progressive Ratio ◽  
Ratio Schedule ◽  
Progressive Ratio Schedule ◽  
Schedule Performance
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document