Effect of IMonabsorbable and Rapidly Absorbable Suture Material on the Cytokinetics of Crypt Cells in Colonic Anastomoses in the Rat

1992 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Huberts ◽  
E. Totté ◽  
E. Van March ◽  
A. Hubens
Keyword(s):  
Suture Material ◽  
Absorbable Suture ◽  
Colonic Anastomoses ◽  
Absorbable Suture Material ◽  
Crypt Cells

Absorbable suture material in carotid surgery

VASA ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 451-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Gasbarro ◽  
Luca Traina ◽  
Francesco Mascoli ◽  
Vincenzo Coscia ◽  
Gianluca Buffone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Suture Material ◽  
Absorbable Suture ◽  
Paediatric Surgery ◽  
Carotid Surgery ◽  
Suture Materials ◽  
Absorbable Suture Material ◽  
Absorbable Sutures ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract. Background: Absorbable sutures are not generally accepted by most vascular surgeons for the fear of breakage of the suture line and the risk of aneurysmal formation, except in cases of paediatric surgery or in case of infections. Aim of this study is to provide evidence of safety and efficacy of the use of absorbable suture materials in carotid surgery. Patients and methods: In an 11 year period, 1126 patients (659 male [58.5 %], 467 female [41.5 %], median age 72) underwent carotid endarterectomy for carotid stenosis by either conventional with primary closure (cCEA) or eversion (eCEA) techniques. Patients were randomised into two groups according to the type of suture material used. In Group A, absorbable suture material (polyglycolic acid) was used and in Group B non-absorbable suture material (polypropylene) was used. Primary end-point was to compare severe restenosis and aneurysmal formation rates between the two groups of patients. For statistical analysis only cases with a minimum period of follow-up of 12 months were considered. Results: A total of 868 surgical procedures were considered for data analysis. Median follow-up was 6 years (range 1-10 years). The rate of postoperative complications was better for group A for both cCEA and eCEA procedures: 3.5 % and 2.0 % for group A, respectively, and 11.8 % and 12.9 % for group B, respectively. Conclusions: In carotid surgery, the use of absorbable suture material seems to be safe and effective and with a general lower complications rate compared to the use of non-absorbable materials.

scholarly journals Single Layer Versus Double Layer Anastomosis of Small Intestine – A Comparative Study from Karnataka, India

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (30) ◽  
pp. 2300-2304
Author(s):  
Tejaswini Murari Pawar ◽  
Ravikiran Hosur Ramamurthy ◽  
Shashirekha Chikkavenkataswamy Anjaneyulu
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Double Layer ◽  
Suture Material ◽  
Intestinal Anastomosis ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
Absorbable Suture ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Absorbable Suture Material ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Layer Technique

BACKGROUND Intestinal anastomosis is an operative procedure that is of importance in the practice of surgery. It is a very commonly performed technique in today’s surgical era. We wanted to study the postoperative complications like anastomotic leak and abscess formation and duration of hospital stay in single layer and double layer anastomosis and compare the same. METHODS In our prospective observational study, 80 patients were reviewed and were divided into 2 groups. Cases were allotted to either group based on the odd even method requiring single- and double-layer anastomosis, odd being single layer and even being double layer anastomosis. Intestinal anastomosis was carried out in single layer technique with delayed absorbable suture material and double layer technique with inner transmural layer with delayed absorbable suture material and seromuscular layer with non-absorbable suture material. RESULTS Each group had 40 patients, there was significant difference noted between the groups. Mean duration of hospital stay in single layer group was 17.85 ± 7.62 days and in double layer group was 26.20 ± 16.12 days (P = 0.043 *). In single group, mean time taken for anastomosis was 18.50 ± 1.73 and in double group was 29.05 ± 2.19. There was significant difference in time taken between two groups (P < 0.001). In single group, majority of subjects had no anastomotic Leak (95 %) and 5 % had leak. In double group 70 % had no leak and 30 % had leak. P value was statistically significant (P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS Single layer anastomosis was better in terms of duration of hospital stay, postoperative anastomotic leaks and time taken for anastomosis. KEY WORDS Single Layer, Double Layer, Small Bowel, Duration of Hospital Stay, Anastomotic Leaks

Comparison of Knotless Barbed Suture Versus Monofilament Suture in the Oral Cavity of Cats

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 148-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corinne L. Durand
Keyword(s):  
Suture Material ◽  
Barbed Suture ◽  
Absorbable Suture ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Absorbable Suture Material ◽  
Monofilament Suture ◽  
Absorbable Sutures ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Time Standard ◽  
Mucosal Wound

The present study compares a knotless, barbed, absorbable suture material against a conventional monofilament absorbable suture material in oral mucosal wound closure. The parameters measured include time of closure and differences in healing at 2 and 4 weeks postoperatively. A prospective study comparing a knotless, barbed suture system with conventional absorbable sutures was undertaken in 19 cats. Nineteen cats had full mouth extractions performed. Following the extraction procedures, the incisions in the arcades (maxillary and mandibular) were apposed with the barbed, knotless suture system in a continuous pattern on one side and with a conventional smooth suture in an interrupted pattern on the other. Suturing times for each arcade were recorded. The material used to close the first side of each cat varied. Healing, dehiscence, and other complications were assessed at 2 and 4 weeks postoperatively. The average closure time (± standard deviation) per quadrant with conventional monofilament suture was 8.7 (±1.3) minutes, while barbed suture required an average of 5.1 (±1.1) minutes per quadrant to complete the suture. This difference (95% confidence interval) of 3.6 (±3.2-4.1) minutes per quadrant was statistically significant ( P < .001). Dehiscence and ranula-like swelling formation were noted as uncommon postoperative complications, but the differences were not significant between the groups. Barbed, knotless sutures resulted in faster closure times than conventional, simple interrupted, monofilament sutures with similar healing and complication rates. To the author’s knowledge, there is no current literature comparing conventional absorbable monofilament sutures to a knotless, barbed, absorbable suture system for closure of oral mucosal incisions in cats.

Results of an Observational Study in Carotid Surgery Using Absorbable Suture Material

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marko Aleksic ◽  
Jan Uedelhoven ◽  
Vladimir Matoussevitch ◽  
Thomas Luebke ◽  
Salvatore Tomagra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Suture Material ◽  
Absorbable Suture ◽  
Carotid Surgery ◽  
Absorbable Suture Material

Operative Endoscopy: A Diathermy-Hook for Cutting of Non-Absorbable Suture Material

Endoscopy ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 6 (01) ◽  
pp. 42-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Classen ◽  
W. Rösch ◽  
P. Frühmorgen ◽  
K. Seuberth ◽  
L. Demling
Keyword(s):  
Suture Material ◽  
Absorbable Suture ◽  
Absorbable Suture Material ◽  
Operative Endoscopy
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document