scholarly journals Fatal Anaphylactic Sting Reaction in a Patient with Mastocytosis

2008 ◽  
Vol 146 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Wagner ◽  
D. Fritze ◽  
B. Przybilla ◽  
M. Hagedorn ◽  
F. Ruëff
Keyword(s):  
Sting Reaction

scholarly journals Benefits of venom immunotherapy: How soon can they be expected

2017 ◽  
Vol 145 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 173-177
Author(s):  
Sasa Kadivec ◽  
Mitja Kosnik
Keyword(s):  
First Year ◽  
Severe Reaction ◽  
Allergic Reactions ◽  
Venom Immunotherapy ◽  
Emergency Situations ◽  
Sting Reaction ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Medical Emergencies ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Patients Experience

Introduction/Objective. Allergic reactions to insect stings are medical emergencies that could be prevented by venom immunotherapy (VIT). The main purpose of VIT is to prevent fatal or life-threatening reactions. We aimed to show the rapidity with which patients experience the benefits of VIT and estimate the number of emergency treatments that are prevented. Methods. We reviewed the medical files of patients who started VIT between 2010 and 2014. We calculated the costs of treatment of the sting reactions, the costs of immunotherapy, and estimated the costs of prevented allergic reactions. Results. In a cohort of 514 patients (40.9% female, age 47.2 ? 14.4 years), the cost of treatment of the index sting reaction was 180.4 ? 166.8 euros. During VIT, 195 patients experienced 446 field stings. In 86.3% of patients, stings were well tolerated, and only one patient experienced a severe reaction (grade III, according to Mueller). A total of 20.4% of VIT treated patients were stung during the first year of VIT and 57% during five years of VIT. The expenditure for five years of VIT was 2,886 euros per patient, which corresponded to an average of 16 emergency treatments for systemic reactions. Conclusion. Emergency situations are prevented in a substantial number of venom-allergic patients and a beneficial effect was already observed during the first year of VIT.

scholarly journals Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents after systemic sting reaction

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-108
Author(s):  
Piotr Brzyski ◽  
Ewa Cichocka-Jarosz ◽  
Izabella Tarczoń ◽  
Urszula Jedynak-Wąsowicz ◽  
Tomasz Tomasik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Sting Reaction ◽  
Health Related

scholarly journals β-blockers and ACE inhibitors are not a risk factor for severe systemic sting reactions and adverse events during venom immunotherapy

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunter Sturm ◽  
Sereina Herzog ◽  
Werner Aberer ◽  
Teresa Alfaya Arias ◽  
Dario Antolin-Amerigo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Ace Inhibitors ◽  
Multicenter Trial ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Venom Immunotherapy ◽  
Sting Reaction ◽  
History Of ◽  
Β Blockers ◽  
Systemic Symptoms

Background: There is controversy whether taking β-blockers or ACE inhibitors (ACEI) is a risk factor for more severe systemic insect sting reactions (SSR) and whether it increases the number or severity of adverse events (AE) during venom immunotherapy (VIT). Methods: In this open, prospective, observational, multicenter trial, we recruited patients with a history of a SSR and indication for VIT. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate whether patients taking β-blockers or ACEI show more systemic AE during VIT compared to patients without such treatment. Results: In total, 1,425 patients were enrolled and VIT was performed in 1,342 patients. Of all patients included, 388 (27.2%) took antihypertensive (AHT) drugs (10.4% took β-blockers, 11.9% ACEI, 5.0% β-blockers and ACEI). Only 5.6% of patients under AHT treatment experienced systemic AE during VIT as compared with 7.4% of patients without these drugs (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.43–1.22, p=0.25). The severity of the initial sting reaction was not affected by the intake of β-blockers or ACEI (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.89–1.46, p=0.29). In total, 210 (17.7%) patients were re-stung during VIT and 191 (91.0%) tolerated the sting without systemic symptoms. Of the 19 patients with VIT treatment failure, 4 took β-blockers, none an ACEI. Conclusions: This trial provides robust evidence that taking β-blockers or ACEI does neither increase the frequency of systemic AE during VIT nor aggravate SSR. Moreover, results suggest that these drugs do not impair effectiveness of VIT. (Funded by Medical University of Graz, Austria; Clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT04269629)

Reported Ant Re-sting Reaction in Thai Children with Ant Anaphylaxis Receiving Immunotherapy

2012 ◽  
Vol 129 (2) ◽  
pp. AB228
Author(s):  
P. Puranitee ◽  
S. Vilaiyuk ◽  
W. Kamchaisatian ◽  
W. Manuyakorn ◽  
W. Teawsomboonkit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sting Reaction

Bee Sting Reaction

2019 ◽  
pp. 293-296
Author(s):  
Charmi Patel ◽  
Punita Ponda
Keyword(s):  
Bee Sting ◽  
Sting Reaction

scholarly journals Effects of a 90-min educational intervention for patients with insect venom allergy: a prospective controlled pilot study

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa-Sophie Schoeben ◽  
Nicole Mohr ◽  
Corinna Bubak ◽  
Astrid Schmieder ◽  
Marthe-Lisa Schaarschmidt
Keyword(s):  
Educational Intervention ◽  
Education Intervention ◽  
Insect Venom Allergy ◽  
Venom Allergy ◽  
Outcome Parameters ◽  
Insect Venom ◽  
Insect Sting ◽  
Emergency Medication ◽  
Sting Reaction ◽  
Insect Sting Allergy

Abstract Background Anaphylactic sting reactions need a prompt management. A structured educational intervention for patients with insect sting allergy has not been implemented so far. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of a structured 90-min educational intervention for patients with insect sting allergy. Methods Patients with an insect venom allergy were offered to participate in a structured 90-min group education (intervention group (IG)) or to attend a control group (CG). The patients’ subjective self-assurance in using the emergency medication, the willingness to always carry the emergency medication, the mental health status, absolute one-time willingness-to-pay (WTP) for complete cure, a disease knowledge assessment and a simulation test to examine the ability to manage an acute sting reaction were estimated at baseline (t0) and at follow-up (t1) as outcome parameters. Results 55 patients participated in the IG (n = 25, 52.0% female, mean age 55.9 years) or the CG (n = 30, 56.7% female, mean age 52.0 years). Both arms showed a significant gain in self-assurance in using the emergency medication (IG: 6.1 at t0 vs. 8.6 at t1, p < 0.0001 and CG: 7.1 vs. 8.0, p = 0.0062) and ability to manage an acute sting reaction (IG: 6.7 vs. 11.4, p < 0.0001 and CG: 9.0 vs. 10.5, p = 0.0002) at t1. However, trained participants showed a significantly higher gain in the respective parameters. There were no significant changes regarding the remaining examined outcome parameters. Conclusions Patients who are willing to invest 90 min in a patient education intervention benefit significantly by an increased subjective and objective empowerment to manage an acute sting reaction.

scholarly journals Risk factors for severe systemic sting reactions in wasp (Vespula spp.) and honeybee (Apis mellifera) venom allergic patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle Fehr ◽  
Sara Micaletto ◽  
Thomas Moehr ◽  
Peter Schmid-Grendelmeier
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Specific Ige ◽  
Latency Time ◽  
Serum Tryptase ◽  
Wasp Venom ◽  
Baseline Serum ◽  
Skin Symptoms ◽  
Sting Reaction ◽  
Potential Risk Factors ◽  
Specific Ige Antibodies

Abstract Background Hymenoptera stings are a major cause of anaphylaxis. Various risk factors are discussed in literature. This study aims to investigate potential risk factors for severe sting reactions in wasp (Vespula spp.) and honeybee (Apis mellifera) venom allergic patients and analyses the correlation between diagnostic test results and the severity of the allergic reaction. Methods 480 patients suffering from wasp or honeybee venom allergy were included in this retrospective case series. Only individuals allergic to Vespula spp. but not to other vespids such as Polistes were considered. The severity of their systemic field sting reaction was analysed with regard to the amount of specific IgE antibodies to whole venom extracts and to major allergens of honeybee and/or wasp venom. Furthermore, the following potential risk factors for severe sting reactions were examined: age, sex, latency time, skin symptoms, baseline serum tryptase levels and the concentration of venom inducing a positive intracutaneous test. Results The two following indicators for severe systemic sting reactions in honeybee and wasp venom allergic patients have been identified: a short latency time and the absence of skin symptoms. The patient’s age and baseline serum tryptase levels have been found to positively correlate with the grade of the sting reaction only in individuals allergic to wasp venom. No correlation could be found between the degree of sensitisation and the severity of the allergic reaction. Neither the amount of specific IgE antibodies to whole venom extracts nor to major allergens were significantly associated with the severity of the sting reaction. Conclusion The clinical history is essential for the allergological workup and therapeutic decision on Hymenoptera venom allergies. A short latency time and the absence of skin symptoms are indicators for severe systemic sting reactions, followed by the patient’s age and baseline serum tryptase levels.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document