Complementarity of Contrast Transcranial Doppler and Contrast Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Detection of Patent Foramen ovale in Stroke Patients

1997 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Devuyst ◽  
P.-A. Despland ◽  
J. Bogousslavsky ◽  
X. Jeanrenaud
Keyword(s):  
Transesophageal Echocardiography ◽  
Transcranial Doppler ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Stroke Patients

Prevalence of Patent Foramen Ovale in Migraine Patients with and Without Aura Compared with Stroke Patients. A Transcranial Doppler Study

Cephalalgia ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 934-939 ◽  
Author(s):  
FJ Carod-Artal ◽  
L da Silveira Ribeiro ◽  
H Braga ◽  
W Kummer ◽  
HM Mesquita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Doppler ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Transcranial Doppler Sonography ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Data Bank ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Doppler Study ◽  
The Difference

The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in a consecutive unselected cohort of migraine patients (with and without aura) and compare it with a group of ischaemic young and elderly stroke patients. One hundred and forty-one migraine patients were compared with 330 stroke patients (130 young patients; 200 elderly patients) selected from our hospital stroke data bank. PFO was assessed with transcranial Doppler sonography with i.v. injection of agitated saline. The prevalence of PFO was 51.7± in migraine with aura (MA) patients, 33.7± in migraine without aura (MoA) patients, 33.8± in young stroke patients and 20.5± in elderly stroke patients ( P < 0.001). The prevalence of PFO in cryptogenic stroke in young and elderly stroke patients was, respectively, 41.1± and 25± ( P = 0.04). The difference between MA and MoA patients was significant (odds ratio = 2.1). The prevalence of PFO in MA patients is higher than in MoA patients and in young cryptogenic stroke patients.

scholarly journals Diagnosis of Patent Foramen Ovale: The Combination of Contrast Transcranial Doppler, Contrast Transthoracic Echocardiography, and Contrast Transesophageal Echocardiography

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Xiaoxue Yang ◽  
Hua Wang ◽  
Yajuan Wei ◽  
Nina Zhai ◽  
Baomin Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transesophageal Echocardiography ◽  
Transcranial Doppler ◽  
Transthoracic Echocardiography ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Valsalva Maneuver ◽  
Large Sample Size ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Practical Strategy ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Nonsignificant Difference

Objectives. To access the distinct values of contrast transcranial Doppler (cTCD), contrast transthoracic echocardiography (cTTE), and contrast transesophageal echocardiography (cTEE) in the diagnosis of right-to-left shunt (RLS) due to patent foramen ovale (PFO) and to define the most practical strategy for the diagnosis of PFO. Methods. 102 patients with a high clinical suspicion for PFO had simultaneous cTCD, cTTE, and cTEE performed. The agitated saline mixed with blood was used to detect right-to-left shunt (RLS). Results. In all 102 patients, the shunt was detected at rest by cTCD in 60.78% of cases, by cTTE in 42.16%, and by cTEE in 47.06%. The positive results of all 3 techniques with Valsalva maneuver (VM) were significantly improved. cTCD showed higher pick-up rate than cTTE (98.04% vs. 89.22%; χ2=12.452, p<0.05) and the cTEE (98.04% vs. 96.08%; nonsignificant difference) in the diagnosis of PFO. Nevertheless, cTEE, compared with cTTE, underestimated shunting in 44% of patients. The diameter of both PFO entrance and exit was significantly greater in patients with a severe shunt compared with a mild shunt (2.8±1.0 mm vs. 2.0±0.7 mm, t=3.135, p<0.05; 2.2±0.7 mm vs. 1.6±0.4 mm, t=−2.582, p<0.05). There was a nonsignificant difference in tunnel length between patients with mild shunting and severe shunting(9.3±2.7 mm vs. 9.4±2.9 mm; t=1.358, p>0.05). Conclusions. The best method to diagnose PFO should be the combination of cTCD, cTTE, and cTEE. And cTCD should be applied as the first choice for screening RLS. Then, cTTE should be performed to quantify the severity of the shunt. Last but not least, cTEE should be performed to assess the morphologies of PFO when the closure is planned. The study provides for clinicians the most practical strategy for diagnosing PFO in the future. However, further trials with a large sample size are required to confirm this finding.

scholarly journals Paradoxical emboli: Clinical importance of transcranial doppler for detection of patent foramen ovale

2010 ◽  
Vol 63 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 445-449
Author(s):  
Zeljko Zivanovic ◽  
Svetlana Ruzicka-Kaloci ◽  
Aleksandar Jesic ◽  
Biljana Radovanovic ◽  
Aleksandra Lucic-Prokin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transesophageal Echocardiography ◽  
Transcranial Doppler ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Doppler Sonography ◽  
Contrast Echocardiography ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Transcranial Doppler Sonography ◽  
Foramen Ovale ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Bubble Test

A patent foramen ovale has been reported to be more frequently detected in cryptogenic stroke, with paradoxical embolism as the major pathogenetic mechanism. The standard procedure for the detection of a patent foramen ovale is transesophageal echo?cardiography. Transcranial Doppler sonography with bubble test is almost as reliable as transesophageal echocardiography. Seventeen patients with acute ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attacks hospitalized at the Department of Neurology in Novi Sad underwent examinations to detect a patent foramen ovale, which was found in 55.6% of patients with cryptogenic stroke. The average age of these patients was 30.6 years. Transcranial Doppler sonography showed 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity for the predicti?on of right-to-left shunts proven by transesophageal contrast echocardiography. Both positive and negative predictive values in our group of patients were 1. Transcranial Doppler with bubble test is a reliable method for the detection of a patent foramen ovale, with a high level of sensitivity and specificity which is comparable with transesophageal echocardiography. Moreover, it is cheaper and more comfortable than transesophageal echocardiography, and should be used routinely in neurological practice.

scholarly journals Comparison of Transthoracic Echocardiography, Transesophageal Echocardiography, and Transcranial Doppler in the Detection of Patent Foramen Ovale as the Etiology for Cryptogenic Stroke

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-133
Author(s):  
Madison B. Stafford ◽  
Jennifer E. Bagley ◽  
Dora DiGiacinto
Keyword(s):  
Transesophageal Echocardiography ◽  
Transcranial Doppler ◽  
Transthoracic Echocardiography ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Patent Foramen Ovale ◽  
Doppler Sonography ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Transcranial Doppler Sonography ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Foramen Ovale

The correlation between cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale is high in young patients. Currently, transesophageal echocardiography is the gold standard for detection. However, it is invasive and limits Valsalva maneuvers. This article reviews the diagnostic accuracy of the three modalities: transthoracic echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography, and transcranial Doppler. The results suggest that transcranial Doppler sonography is an accurate, easily accessible procedure for detecting patent foramen ovale and should be considered an excellent alternative to transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography. Transesophageal echocardiography is still necessary for patients who require treatment. The combination of transcranial Doppler and transesophageal echocardiography provides the highest level of information regarding the complete diagnosis of patent foramen ovales.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document