Mechanism of Neuroadenolysis of the Pituitary for Cancer Pain Control

1984 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 97-110
Author(s):  
A. Trouwborst ◽  
H. Yanagida ◽  
W. Erdmann ◽  
A. Kok
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Pain Control

Pain and Symptom Management in Palliative Care

1996 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 204-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Ripamonti ◽  
Eduardo Bruera
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Control Strategy ◽  
Symptom Management ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Pharmacologic Management

Background Pain, dyspnea, and anorexia are common symptoms experienced by patients with cancer and often are poorly managed. Methods The incidence and causes of these symptoms are described, as well as factors that exacerbate or ameliorate their impact. Results Pharmacologic management of cancer pain is based on the use of a sequential “ladder” that incorporates nonopioid, opioid, and adjuvant drugs, depending on the severity of the pain. This approach usually is effective. Other symptoms of advanced disease may be more difficult to control. Conclusions Adherence to an adequate pain-control strategy will significantly enhance palliation of pain in patients with cancer.

scholarly journals Patient and Caregiver Perceptions of Cancer Pain Control

1999 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 257-261
Author(s):  
Patricia Rushton ◽  
Sherry Brown
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Pain Control

scholarly journals TRIAL OF THEREX IMPLANTABLE PUMP DELIVERED INTRATHECAL M.S. IN CANCER PAIN CONTROL

1991 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. A741-A741
Author(s):  
D. Coombs ◽  
R. L. Saunders ◽  
L. H. Maurer ◽  
K. Vernier ◽  
T. Ahles
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Implantable Pump

scholarly journals A Prospective Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Osmotic Release Oral System (Oros®) Hydromorphone in Opioid-Naive Cancer Patients: Results of the Korean South West Oncology Group Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 293-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun-Kee Song ◽  
Hyunjeong Shim ◽  
Hye-Suk Han ◽  
DerSheng Sun ◽  
Soon-Il Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Intensity Difference ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Long Acting

BACKGROUND: Osmotic release oral system (OROS®) hydromorphone is a potent, long-acting opioid analgesic, effective and safe for controlling cancer pain in patients who have received other strong opioids. To date, few studies have examined the efficacy of hydromorphone for pain relief in opioid-naive cancer patients.OBJECTIVES: A prospective, open-label, multicentre trial was conducted to determine the efficacy and tolerability of OROS hydromorphone as a single and front-line opioid therapy for patients experiencing moderate to severe cancer pain.METHODS: OROS hydromorphone was administered to patients who had not previously received strong, long-acting opioids. The baseline evaluation (visit 1) was followed by two evaluations (visits 2 and 3) performed two and 14 weeks later, respectively. The starting dose of OROS hydromorphone was 4 mg/day and was increased every two days when pain control was insufficient. Immediate-release hydromorphone was the only accepted alternative strong opioid for relief of breakthrough pain. The efficacy, safety and tolerability of OROS hydromorphone, including the effects on quality of life, and patients’ and investigators’ global impressions on pain relief were evaluated. The primary end point was pain intensity difference (PID) at visit 2 relative to visit 1 (expressed as %PID).RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were enrolled in the present study. An improvement in pain intensity of >50% (≥50% PID) was observed in 51.0% of the full analysis set and 58.6% of the per-protocol set. The mean pain score, measured using a numerical rating scale, was significantly reduced after two weeks of treatment, and most adverse events were manageable. Quality of life also improved, and >70% of patients and investigators were satisfied with the treatment.CONCLUSIONS: OROS hydromorphone provided effective pain relief and improved quality of life in opioid-naive cancer patients. As a single and front-line treatment, OROS hydromorphone delivered rapid pain control.

scholarly journals Role of Oxycodone Hydrochloride in Treating Radiotherapy-Related Pain

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Yinxia Wang ◽  
Ligang Xing
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Analgesic Drugs ◽  
Oxycodone Hydrochloride ◽  
Radiation Esophagitis

Radiotherapy is commonly used to treat cancer patients. Besides the curable effect, radiotherapy also could relieve the pain of cancer patients. However, cancer pain is gradually alleviated about two weeks after radiotherapy. In addition, cancer patients who receive radiotherapy may also suffer from pain flare or radiotherapy-induced side effects such as radiation esophagitis, enteritis, and mucositis. Pain control is reported to be inadequate during the whole course of radiotherapy (before, during, and after radiotherapy), and quality of life is seriously affected. Hence, radiotherapy is suggested to be combined with analgesic drugs in clinical guidelines. Previous studies have shown that radiotherapy combined with oxycodone hydrochloride can effectively alleviate cancer pain. In this review, we firstly presented the necessity of analgesia during the whole course of radiotherapy. We also sketched the role of oxycodone hydrochloride in radiotherapy of bone metastases and radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis. Finally, we concluded that oxycodone hydrochloride shows good efficacy and tolerance and could be used for pain management before, during, and after radiotherapy.

Pain Management in the Cancer Patient

1998 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 349-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristi L. Lenz ◽  
Eileen M. Marley
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Cancer Patient ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Cancer Pain Management ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
Adequate Pain Management

Of the over one million patients diagnosed with cancer each year, 30 percent will have pain at diagnosis and up to 85 percent will have pain as their disease progresses. Adequate pain management continues to be hindered by multiple patient-and clinician-related barriers; however, with increased awareness and knowledge, the pharmacy practitioner can play a key role in facilitating pain management. This review will focus on the mechanisms of cancer pain, the role of non-opioids, opioids, and adjuvant agents in the treatment of cancer pain, and the basic principles of cancer pain management that allow 70 to 90 percent of patients to achieve excellent pain control.

What is stable pain control? A prospective longitudinal study to assess the clinical value of a personalized pain goal

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 913-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Fainsinger ◽  
Cheryl Nekolaichuk ◽  
Lara Fainsinger ◽  
Viki Muller ◽  
Lisa Fainsinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal Study ◽  
Goal Definition ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal ◽  
Cognitively Intact

Background: A universal consensus regarding standardized pain outcomes does not exist. The personalized pain goal has been suggested as a clinically relevant outcome measure. Aim: To assess the feasibility of obtaining a personalized pain goal and to compare a clinically based personalized pain goal definition versus a research-based study definition for stable pain. Design: Prospective longitudinal descriptive study. Measures: The attending physician completed routine assessments, including a personalized pain goal and the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain, and followed patients daily until stable pain control, death, or discharge. Stable pain for cognitively intact patients was defined as pain intensity less than or equal to desired pain intensity goal (personalized pain goal definition) or pain intensity ⩽3 (Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain study definition) for three consecutive days with <3 breakthroughs per day. Setting/participants: A total of 300 consecutive advanced cancer patients were recruited from two acute care hospitals and a tertiary palliative care unit. Results: In all, 231/300 patients (77%) had a pain syndrome; 169/231 (73%) provided a personalized pain goal, with 113/169 (67%) reporting a personalized pain goal ⩽3 (median = 3, range = 0–10). Using the personalized pain goal definition as the gold standard, sensitivity and specificity of the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain definition were 71.3% and 98.5%, respectively. For mild (0–3), moderate (4–6), and severe (7–10) pain, the highest sensitivity was for moderate pain (90.5%), with high specificity across all three categories (95%–100%). Conclusion: The personalized pain goal is a feasible outcome measure for cognitively intact patients. The Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain definition closely resembles patient-reported personalized pain goals for stable pain and would be appropriate for research purposes. For clinical pain management, it would be important to include the personalized pain goal as standard practice.

scholarly journals Application of quality control circle in the treatment of moderate cancer pain in inpatients

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 581-585
Author(s):  
Yehuan Liu ◽  
Beibei Lin
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Quality Control ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Management Tool ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Observation Group ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Context Pain is one of the most common and intolerable symptoms in cancer patients. But cancer pain control is still negative in China. Objectives This paper explores the application of quality control circle in the treatment of cancer pain in inpatients to improve the quality of life of patients with cancer pain. Method Established a quality control circle group to analyze the current status of cancer pain control in inpatients with moderate cancer pain, set goals, formulate corresponding countermeasures and implement and review them in stages. The plan-do-check-act method was cyclically applied. The Brief Pain Inventory was used to evaluate the cancer pain status of patients with cancer pain hospitalized before (January to April 2016) and after (September to December 2016) the implementation of quality control circle activities. Results The pain control effect of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group. The mean (standard deviation) of pain severity and pain interference in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (6.21 [2.86] vs 4.31 [2.25], 10.54 [4.10] vs 7.25 [3.77]). There was significant difference after the implementation of quality control circle (P &lt; 0.01). Conclusion Quality control circle activities are used to manage patients with cancer pain, to improve the situation of pain control and to improve the quality of life of patients. This management tool and method is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document