Ipsilateral Electric Acoustic Stimulation of the Auditory System: Results of Long-Term Hearing Preservation

2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang K. Gstoettner ◽  
Silke Helbig ◽  
Nicola Maier ◽  
Jan Kiefer ◽  
Andreas Radeloff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Auditory System ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Acoustic Stimulation ◽  
Electric Acoustic Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

Electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a multi-centre investigation

2008 ◽  
Vol 128 (9) ◽  
pp. 968-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang K. Gstoettner ◽  
Paul Van de Heyning ◽  
Alec Fitzgerald O'Connor ◽  
Constantino Morera ◽  
Manuel Sainz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Auditory System ◽  
Acoustic Stimulation ◽  
Electric Acoustic Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

Long-term Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. e353-e359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silke Helbig ◽  
Youssef Adel ◽  
Tobias Rader ◽  
Timo Stöver ◽  
Uwe Baumann
Keyword(s):  
Cochlear Implantation ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Acoustic Stimulation ◽  
Electric Acoustic Stimulation

Long-term Follow-up of Hearing Preservation in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Patients

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 1765-1772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Griet Mertens ◽  
Andrea Kleine Punte ◽  
Ellen Cochet ◽  
Marc De Bodt ◽  
Paul Van de Heyning
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Acoustic Stimulation ◽  
Electric Acoustic Stimulation ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Electric-Acoustic Stimulation of the Auditory System: A Review of the First Decade

2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (s2) ◽  
pp. 1-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph A. von Ilberg ◽  
Uwe Baumann ◽  
Jan Kiefer ◽  
Jochen Tillein ◽  
Oliver F. Adunka
Keyword(s):  
Auditory System ◽  
Acoustic Stimulation ◽  
System A ◽  
Electric Acoustic Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

Electric-Acoustic Stimulation of the Auditory System

ORL ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 334-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. vonIlberg ◽  
J. Kiefer ◽  
J. Tillein ◽  
T. Pfenningdorff ◽  
R. Hartmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Auditory System ◽  
Acoustic Stimulation ◽  
Electric Acoustic Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

scholarly journals Preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implant surgery with slim modiolar electrode

2019 ◽  
Vol 277 (2) ◽  
pp. 367-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matti Iso-Mustajärvi ◽  
Sini Sipari ◽  
Heikki Löppönen ◽  
Aarno Dietz
Keyword(s):  
Low Frequency ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Acoustic Stimulation ◽  
Residual Hearing ◽  
Insertion Depth ◽  
Cochlear Implant Surgery ◽  
Computed Tomography Scans ◽  
Electric Acoustic Stimulation ◽  
Speech Recognition In Noise

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the insertion results and hearing preservation of a novel slim modiolar electrode (SME) in patients with residual hearing. Methods We retrospectively collected the data from the medical files of 17 patients (18 ears) implanted with a SME. All patients had functional low frequency hearing (PTA (0.125–0.5 kHz) ≤ 80 dB HL). The insertion results were re-examined from the postoperative cone-beam computed tomography scans. Postoperative thresholds were obtained at the time of switch-on of the sound processors (mean 43 days) and at latest follow-up (mean 582 days). The speech recognition in noise was measured with the Finnish matrix sentence test preoperatively and at follow-up. Results The mean insertion depth angle (IDA) was 395°. Neither scala dislocations nor tip fold over were detected. There were no total hearing losses. Functional low-frequency hearing was preserved in 15/18 (83%) ears at switch-on and in 14/17 (82%) ears at follow-up. According to HEARRING classification, 55% (10/18) had complete HP at switch-on and 41% (7/17) still at follow-up. Thirteen patients (14 ears) were initially fitted with electric–acoustic stimulation and seven patients (8 ears) continued to use it after follow-up. Conclusions The preliminary hearing preservation results with the SME were more favorable than reported for other perimodiolar electrodes. The results show that the array may also be feasible for electro-acoustic stimulation; it is beneficial in that it provides adequate cochlear coverage for pure electrical stimulation in the event of postoperative or progressive hearing loss.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document