Radiosurgery for the Management of Spinal Metastases

Radiosurgery ◽  
2006 ◽  
pp. 199-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter C. Gerszten ◽  
Steven A. Burton ◽  
Cihat Ozhasoglu ◽  
William J. Vogel ◽  
Annette E. Quinn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Metastases

Intradural tumor recurrence after resection of extradural metastasis: a rare but potential complication of intraoperative durotomy

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 734-739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manish K. Kasliwal ◽  
Lee A. Tan ◽  
John E. O'Toole
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Recurrence ◽  
Spinal Metastasis ◽  
Spinal Metastases ◽  
Intramedullary Tumor ◽  
Local Tumor ◽  
Local Tumor Recurrence ◽  
Tumor Dissemination ◽  
Intradural Tumor ◽  
Clinical Consequences ◽  
Clinical Awareness

Spinal metastases are the most common of spinal neoplasms and occur predominantly in an extradural location. Their appearance in an intradural location is uncommon and is associated with a poor prognosis. Cerebrospinal fluid dissemination accounts for a significant number of intradural spinal metastases mostly manifesting as leptomeningeal carcinomatoses or drop metastases from intracranial tumors. The occurrence of local tumor dissemination intradurally following surgery for an extradural spinal metastasis has not been reported previously. The authors describe 2 cases in which local intradural and intramedullary tumor recurrences occurred following resection of extradural metastases that were complicated by unintended durotomy. To heighten clinical awareness of this unusual form of local tumor recurrence, the authors discuss the possible etiology and clinical consequences of this entity.

scholarly journals Radiation Therapy without Surgery for Spinal Metastases: Clinical Outcome and Prognostic Factors Analysis for Pain Control

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-141
Author(s):  
Akira Matsumura ◽  
Manabu Hoshi ◽  
Masatsugu Takami ◽  
Takahiko Tashiro ◽  
Hiroaki Nakamura
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Spinal Metastases ◽  
Factors Analysis

scholarly journals Management of recurrent or progressive spinal metastases: reirradiation techniques and surgical principles

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i45-i53
Author(s):  
Rupesh Kotecha ◽  
Nicolas Dea ◽  
Jay S Detsky ◽  
Arjun Sahgal
Keyword(s):  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Organs At Risk ◽  
Methodological Approach ◽  
Spinal Metastases ◽  
Multidisciplinary Care ◽  
Rehabilitation Medicine ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Mechanical Instability ◽  
Conventional Radiotherapy ◽  
Treated Site

Abstract With the growing incidence of new cases and the increasing prevalence of patients living longer with spine metastasis, a methodological approach to the management of patients with recurrent or progressive disease is increasing in relevance and importance in clinical practice. As a result, disease management has evolved in these patients using advanced surgical and radiotherapy technologies. Five key goals in the management of patients with spine metastases include providing pain relief, controlling metastatic disease at the treated site, improving neurologic deficits, maintaining or improving functional status, and minimizing further mechanical instability. The focus of this review is on advanced reirradiation techniques, given that the majority of patients will be treated with upfront conventional radiotherapy and further treatment on progression is often limited by the cumulative tolerance of nearby organs at risk. This review will also discuss novel surgical approaches such as separation surgery, minimally invasive percutaneous instrumentation, and laser interstitial thermal therapy, which is increasingly being coupled with spine reirradiation to maximize outcomes in this patient population. Lastly, given the complexities of managing recurrent spinal disease, this review emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary care from neurosurgery, radiation oncology, medical oncology, neuro-oncology, rehabilitation medicine, and palliative care.

scholarly journals Prospective cohort study of surgical outcome for spinal metastases in patients aged 70 years or older

2020 ◽  
Vol 102-B (12) ◽  
pp. 1709-1716
Author(s):  
Yutaro Kanda ◽  
Kenichiro Kakutani ◽  
Yoshitada Sakai ◽  
Takashi Yurube ◽  
Shingo Miyazaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Spinal Metastases ◽  
Palliative Surgery ◽  
Advanced Age ◽  
Health State ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
The Mean

Aims With recent progress in cancer treatment, the number of advanced-age patients with spinal metastases has been increasing. It is important to clarify the influence of advanced age on outcomes following surgery for spinal metastases, especially with a focus on subjective health state values. Methods We prospectively analyzed 101 patients with spinal metastases who underwent palliative surgery from 2013 to 2016. These patients were divided into two groups based on age (< 70 years and ≥ 70 years). The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS), Barthel index (BI), and EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) score were assessed at study enrolment and at one, three, and six months after surgery. The survival times and complications were also collected. Results In total, 65 patients were aged < 70 years (mean 59.6 years; 32 to 69) and 36 patients were aged ≥ 70 years (mean 75.9 years; 70 to 90). In both groups, the PS improved from PS3 to PS1 by spine surgery, the mean BI improved from < 60 to > 80 points, and the mean EQ-5D score improved from 0.0 to > 0.7 points. However, no significant differences were found in the improvement rates and values of the PS, BI, and EQ-5D score at any time points between the two groups. The PS, BI, and EQ-5D score improved throughout the follow-up period in approximately 90% of patients in each group. However, the improved PS, BI, and EQ-5D scores subsequently deteriorated in some patients, and the redeterioration rate of the EQ-5D was significantly higher in patients aged ≥ 70 than < 70 years (p = 0.027). Conclusion Palliative surgery for spinal metastases improved the PS, activities of daily living, and quality of life, regardless of age. However, clinicians should be aware of the higher risk of redeterioration of the quality of life in advanced-age patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(12):1709–1716.

Vertebral compression fracture rate following stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for spine oligometastases: a UK experience

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Sameed Hussain ◽  
Anjali Zarkar ◽  
Ahmed Elmodir ◽  
Daniel Ford ◽  
Sundus Yahya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vertebral Compression Fracture ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Spinal Metastases ◽  
Compression Fracture ◽  
Spinal Instability ◽  
Fracture Rate ◽  
Strict Adherence ◽  
Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Vertebral Bodies ◽  
Pre Treatment

Abstract Aim: Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for spine metastases is associated with a risk of vertebral compression fracture (VCF). The aim of this study was to determine the rate of VCF at one UK institution and evaluate the use of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) to predict these. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent SABR for spinal metastases between 2014 and 2018 at one UK institution was performed. Basic demographic data were collected, and SINS prior to SABR was calculated. The primary outcome was VCF rate. Secondary outcomes included time to VCF and need for surgical intervention following VCF. Results: A total of 48 oligometastases were treated with a median follow-up of 20·5 months. A maximum of two vertebral bodies were treated. The median baseline SINS was calculated as 3. The median dose was 26 Gy in three fractions. Two patients were reported to have VCF and both were successfully conservatively managed. Findings: SABR for spine oligometastases is being performed safely with low VCF rates which are comparable with those in international publications. This may be as a result of strict adherence to criteria for delivery of SABR with low pre-treatment SINS.

Disparities in Patterns of Conventional Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Spine Metastasis in the United States

2020 ◽  
pp. 082585972098220
Author(s):  
Ellen Kim ◽  
Shearwood McClelland ◽  
Jerry J. Jaboin ◽  
Albert Attia
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Spinal Metastases ◽  
The United States ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Cancer Data ◽  
Spine Metastases ◽  
Population Type

Introduction: The improved survival of patients even with metastatic cancer has led to an increase in the incidence of spine metastases, suggesting the need for a more aggressive palliative treatment than conventional external beam radiation therapy (cEBRT). Consequently, spinal stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has increased in popularity over the past decade. However, there has been no comparison of patterns of usage of cEBRT versus SBRT in the treatment of spinal metastases in the US. Methods: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) from 2004-2013 was used for analysis. cEBRT was defined as 30 Gy in 10 fractions, 20 Gy in 5 fractions, or 8 Gy in 1 fraction. SBRT was defined as 25-32 Gy infive5 fractions, 24-32 Gy in 4 fractions, 20-32 Gy in three fractions, 14-32 Gy in 2 fractions, or 14-24 Gy in 1 fraction. Single and multivariable associations between patient demographic and cancer characteristics and type of radiation were performed. Results: From 2004-2013, 23,181 patients with spinal metastases in the United States received cEBRT, while 1,030 received SBRT as part of their first course of treatment. Most patients (88%) received 10 fractions of radiation. Multivariable analysis suggested that non-Medicare or private insurance (adjusted OR 0.4-0.7), African-American race (adjusted OR = 0.8, 95%CI = 0.7-1.0), age 65+ (adjusted OR = 0.8), living in a region with lower population (adjusted OR 0.7), earlier year of diagnosis (OR = 0.9), and receiving treatment in a non-academic/research facility (adjusted OR 0.6) were associated with cEBRT. After controlling for other variables, regional education level was no longer significantly associated with cEBRT. Conclusions: Most patients with spine metastases were treated with cEBRT, usually with 10 fractions. Receipt of SBRT was significantly associated with race, insurance, geography, population, type of treatment facility, and year of diagnosis, even after controlling for other factors. These findings raise questions about disparities in access to and delivery of care that deserve further investigation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document