The AMPA Antagonist ZK 200775 in Patients with Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A Double-Blind, Multicentre, Placebo-Controlled Safety and Tolerability Study

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 304-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.R. Walters ◽  
Markku Kaste ◽  
K.R. Lees ◽  
Hans C. Diener ◽  
M. Hommel ◽  
...  
BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e045559
Author(s):  
Xuelei Zhang ◽  
Anxin Wang ◽  
Jing Yu Zhang ◽  
Baixue Jia ◽  
Xiaochuan Huo ◽  
...  

IntroductionAs a neuroprotective medication, butylphthalide (NBP) may help protect against cerebral ischaemic injury. However, evidence on whether NBP influences the outcomes of patients who had acute ischaemic stroke who are receiving revascularisation treatment is limited. This study aims to evaluate whether additional NBP therapy can improve the functional outcome of patients who receive intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and/or endovascular treatment (EVT).Methods and analysisThe study will be a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-centre, parallel group trial. The sample size is estimated at 1200 patients. Eligible patients will be randomised at a 1:1 ratio to receive either NBP or placebo daily for 90 days, which will include 14 days of injections and 76 days of capsules. The first use of NBP/placebo will be started within 6 hours of onset of ischaemic stroke. The primary outcome is the functional outcome as assessed by the 90-day modified Rankin Scale, adjusted for baseline scores on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. The primary safety outcome is the percentage of serious adverse events during the 90 days of treatment. This trial will determine whether NBP medication benefits patients who had acute ischaemic stroke who receive intravenous thrombolysis or EVT.Ethics and disseminationThe protocol was written according to the general ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee of Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University with approval number KY 2018-003-02. Ethics committees of all participating sites have approved the study . Results of the study will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and shared in scientific presentations.Trial registration numberNCT03539445.


The Lancet ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 395 (10227) ◽  
pp. 878-887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D Hill ◽  
Mayank Goyal ◽  
Bijoy K Menon ◽  
Raul G Nogueira ◽  
Ryan A McTaggart ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 338-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrei V Alexandrov ◽  
Martin Köhrmann ◽  
Lauri Soinne ◽  
Georgios Tsivgoulis ◽  
Andrew D Barreto ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristian Lundsgaard Kraglund ◽  
Janne Kaergaard Mortensen ◽  
Søren Paaske Johnsen ◽  
Grethe Andersen ◽  
Erik Lerkevang Grove

AbstractWe evaluated the effect of SSRI treatment on platelet aggregation in patients with ischaemic stroke and included patients from the randomized double-blind controlled study of citalopram in acute ischaemic stroke (TALOS). Patients on clopidogrel were included 6 months after acute ischaemic stroke. Platelet parameters, including P2Y12 platelet reactivity using the VerifyNow System, were measured at the last day of study treatment and repeated after a 14-day wash-out period. A total of 60 patients were included (n = 32 randomized to citalopram). Platelet aggregation levels did not differ between the citalopram group (mean 116, 95% CI 89 to 143) and the placebo group (mean 136, 95% CI 109 to 163) (On-treatment, p = 0.14). Similarly, there was no significant change in platelet aggregation in the citalopram group from on-treatment to post-treatment (mean difference 2.0; 95% CI −18 to 14). Platelet count, size and turnover were not affected by SSRI treatment. In conclusion, SSRI therapy did not lead to statistically significant inhibition of platelet aggregation in ischaemic stroke patients treated with clopidogrel.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document