Improved mRNA Quantitation in LightCycler RT-PCR

2003 ◽  
Vol 130 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.B. Ball ◽  
F.A. Plummer ◽  
K.T. HayGlass
Keyword(s):  
Rt Pcr ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 48-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace Adams

The development of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), for which Kary Mullis received the 1992 Novel Prize in Chemistry, revolutionized molecular biology. At around the time that prize was awarded, research was being carried out by Russel Higuchi which led to the discovery that PCR can be monitored using fluorescent probes, facilitating quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). In addition, the earlier discovery of reverse transcriptase (in 1970) laid the groundwork for the development of RT-PCR (used in molecular cloning). The latter can be coupled to qPCR, termed RT-qPCR, allowing analysis of gene expression through messenger RNA (mRNA) quantitation. These techniques and their applications have transformed life science research and clinical diagnosis.


1994 ◽  
pp. 97-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamel Chelly ◽  
Axel Kahn
Keyword(s):  
Rt Pcr ◽  

Author(s):  
J. R. Hully ◽  
K. R. Luehrsen ◽  
K. Aoyagi ◽  
C. Shoemaker ◽  
R. Abramson

The development of PCR technology has greatly accelerated medical research at the genetic and molecular levels. Until recently, the inherent sensitivity of this technique has been limited to isolated preparations of nucleic acids which lack or at best have limited morphological information. With the obvious exception of cell lines, traditional PCR or reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) cannot identify the cellular source of the amplified product. In contrast, in situ hybridization (ISH) by definition, defines the anatomical location of a gene and/or it’s product. However, this technique lacks the sensitivity of PCR and cannot routinely detect less than 10 to 20 copies per cell. Consequently, the localization of rare transcripts, latent viral infections, foreign or altered genes cannot be identified by this technique. In situ PCR or in situ RT-PCR is a combination of the two techniques, exploiting the sensitivity of PCR and the anatomical definition provided by ISH. Since it’s initial description considerable advances have been made in the application of in situ PCR, improvements in protocols, and the development of hardware dedicated to in situ PCR using conventional microscope slides. Our understanding of the importance of viral latency or viral burden in regards to HIV, HPV, and KSHV infections has benefited from this technique, enabling detection of single viral copies in cells or tissue otherwise thought to be normal. Clearly, this technique will be useful tool in pathobiology especially carcinogenesis, gene therapy and manipulations, the study of rare gene transcripts, and forensics.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 360-360
Author(s):  
Ana Agud ◽  
Maria J. Ribal ◽  
Lourdes Mengual ◽  
Mercedes Marin-Aguilera ◽  
Laura Izquierdo ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 145-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Schostak ◽  
Hans Krause ◽  
Jens Köllermann ◽  
Mark Schrader ◽  
Bernd Straub ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 485-486
Author(s):  
Sabarinath B. Nair ◽  
Christodoulos Pipinikas ◽  
Roger Kirby ◽  
Nick Carter ◽  
Christiane Fenske

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 436-436
Author(s):  
John A. Petros ◽  
Audry N. Schuetz ◽  
Andrew N. Young ◽  
Q. Yin Goen ◽  
So Dug Lim ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 362-363
Author(s):  
Mark G. Schrader ◽  
Markus Muller ◽  
Wolfgang Schulze ◽  
Steffen Weikert ◽  
Kurt Miller

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document