The Classification of Anxiety Disorders in ICD-10 and DSM-IV: A Concordance Analysis

2002 ◽  
Vol 35 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 100-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gavin Andrews ◽  
Tim Slade
Keyword(s):  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Concordance Analysis ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Dsm Iv

Problemi di psicoterapia

2010 ◽  
pp. 53-66
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Manual ◽  
Diagnostic And Statistical Manual ◽  
Dsm V ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Dsm Iv

Vengono presentati i principali sistemi di diagnosi psichiatrica, e precisamente le ultime edizioni del Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) dell'American Psychiatric Association (il DSM-III del 1980, il DSM-III-R del 1987, il DSM-IV del 1994, il DSM-IV-TR del 2000, e il DSM-V previsto per il 2013), la 10a edizione dell'International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) proposta nel 1992 dall'Organizzazione Mondiale della Sanitŕ (OMS), e il Manuale Diagnostico Psicodinamico (PDM) prodotto dalla comunitŕ psicoanalitica internazionale nel 2006. A proposito dei DSM, vengono discussi alcuni problemi metodologici quali le dicotomie validitŕ/attendibilitŕ, categorie/dimensioni e politetico/monotetico, e anticipati alcuni dibattiti critici a proposito del futuro DSM-V. Infine, vengono discusse le seguenti problematiche: la psicopatologia "descrittiva" e "strutturale"; la diagnosi come "difesa" del terapeuta; l'aspetto scientifico e l'aspetto filosofico della diagnosi; i tentativi di "sospensione" del giudizio e dei nostri preconcetti; la dicotomia nomotetico-idiografico.

Diagnosis and classification of personality disorders

2012 ◽  
pp. 855-860
Author(s):  
James Reich ◽  
Giovanni de Girolamo
Keyword(s):  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Personality Disorders ◽  
Assessment Methods ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Diagnosis And Classification ◽  
Dsm Iv ◽  
Similarities And Differences ◽  
Different Cultures

There has been considerable interest in the study of personality and personality disorder (PD) since early times and in many different cultures. This chapter covers definitions of personality disorders, ICD and DSM classifications of personality disorders, similarities and differences between ICD-10 and DSM-IV, recent changes in the conceptualization of DSM personality disorders, categorical versus dimensional styles of classification, and assessment methods for personality disorders.

scholarly journals Concordances and discrepancies between ICD-10 and DSM-IV criteria for anxiety disorders in childhood and adolescence

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Adornetto ◽  
Andrea Suppiger ◽  
Tina In-Albon ◽  
Murielle Neuschwander ◽  
Silvia Schneider
Keyword(s):  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Childhood And Adolescence ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Dsm Iv

scholarly journals Cognitive–behavioural therapy for body dysmorphic disorder

2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Veale
Keyword(s):  
World Health Organization ◽  
American Psychiatric Association ◽  
Body Dysmorphic Disorder ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
World Health ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Dsm Iv ◽  
Health Organization

The DSM–IV classification of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) refers to an individual's preoccupation with an ‘imagined’ defect in his or her appearance or markedly excessive concern with a slight physical anomaly (American Psychiatric Association, 1994). An Italian psychiatrist, Morselli, first used the term ‘dysmorphophobia’ in 1886, although it is now falling into disuse, probably because ICD–10 (World Health Organization, 1992) has discarded it, subsuming the condition under hypochondriacal disorder.

scholarly journals Distress and fear disorders: an alternative empirically based taxonomy of the ‘mood’ and ‘anxiety’ disorders

2006 ◽  
Vol 189 (6) ◽  
pp. 481-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee Anna Clark ◽  
David Watson
Keyword(s):  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Broad Group ◽  
Mood And Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Dsm V ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Dsm Iv ◽  
Internalising Disorders

SummaryThe nosological organisation of DSM – IV and ICD–10 does not capture the empirical structure of the mood and anxiety disorders. Instead, they form a broad group of ‘internalising’ disorders with two subclasses: distress disorders and fear disorders. This empirical structure should form the basis for revised taxonomies in DSM–V and ICD–11.

How Should Mood Disorders be Modelled?

2008 ◽  
Vol 42 (10) ◽  
pp. 841-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon Parker
Keyword(s):  
Mental Disorder ◽  
Fuzzy Sets ◽  
Mood Disorders ◽  
Clinical Utility ◽  
Depressive Disorders ◽  
Dimensional Model ◽  
Alternative Strategies ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Dsm Iv

Classification of any mental disorder is likely to have clinical utility only if it is based on a valid underlying model. The depressive disorders have long provoked debates as to whether a categorical or a dimensional model is all explanatory. This paper will argue that no single (categorical or dimensional) model is likely to be valid, and that a mix of models is required to classify, diagnose and shape management decisions for the mood disorders. After reviewing limitations to the dimensionally based official classificatory systems (DSM-IV and ICD-10), and noting some of the consequences, a set of alternative strategies is outlined. In essence, identifying syndromal ‘fuzzy sets’ from phenotypic and aetiological clustering, a model that occurs in the rest of medicine.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document