Validation of Foot to Foot Bioelectrical Impedance in 6- to 10-Year-Old Children

2000 ◽  
pp. 168-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.A. Abbott ◽  
P.S.W. Davies
Keyword(s):  
Bioelectrical Impedance

Validation of a bioelectrical impedance scale for the estimation of body fat in adolescents

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 369
Author(s):  
Andreia Pelegrini ◽  
André De Araújo Pinto ◽  
Hector Cris Colares De Angelo ◽  
Gaia Salvador Claumann ◽  
Diego Augusto Santos Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Fat ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
Air Displacement Plethysmography ◽  
Overweight Adolescents ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
Absolute Measurements

Several different instruments available on the market have been used for the estimation of body fat. However, many of these instruments have not been compared with reference criteria to verify their true accuracy. This study aimed to verify the validity of a bioelectrical impedance scale (OMRON-514C) for the estimation of body fat. Forty-four overweight adolescents (25 females) participated in this study, with an average age of 12.3 ± 1.1 years. All were submitted to body fat evaluations by air displacement plethysmography and bioelectrical impedance. Higher values of relative and absolute body fat were estimated by bioelectrical impedance compared to plethysmography (p < 0.05). There was no correlation between the relative body fat measurements between the two methods (r = 0.185; p = 0.228). The absolute measurements of body fat were correlated (r = 0.497, p = 0.001). Both in the measurements of relative (p= 0.034) and absolute body fat (p = 0.021), the bioelectrical impedance overestimated the measured values. Thus, in adolescents with characteristics similar to the present study, the estimate of body fat by the bioelectrical impedance (OMRON-514C) should be used with caution.Keywords: plethysmography, bioelectrical impedance, adolescents, overweight.

Prediction of percentage body fat from anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance in Singaporean and Beijing Chinese

2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Deurenberg ◽  
Mabel Deurenberg-Yap ◽  
Jingzhong Wang ◽  
Fu Po Lin ◽  
Gordon Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Body Fat ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
Percentage Body Fat

scholarly journals Making the choice between bioelectrical impedance measures for body hydration status assessment

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitry M. Davydov ◽  
Andrey Boev ◽  
Stas Gorbunov
Keyword(s):  
Body Schema ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
Information Criterion ◽  
The Body ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Hydration Status ◽  
Status Assessment ◽  
Best Fitting ◽  
Body Compartments ◽  
Fitting In

AbstractSituational or persistent body fluid deficit (i.e., de- or hypo-hydration) is considered a significant health risk factor. Bioimpedance analysis (BIA) has been suggested as an alternative to less reliable subjective and biochemical indicators of hydration status. The present study aimed to compare various BIA models in the prediction of direct measures of body compartments associated with hydration/osmolality. Fish (n = 20) was selected as a biological model for physicochemically measuring proximate body compartments associated with hydration such as water, dissolved proteins, and non-osseous minerals as the references or criterion points. Whole-body and segmental/local impedance measures were used to investigate a pool of BIA models, which were compared by Akaike Information Criterion in their ability to accurately predict the body components. Statistical models showed that ‘volumetric-based’ BIA measures obtained in parallel, such as distance2/Rp, could be the best approach in predicting percent of body moisture, proteins, and minerals in the whole-body schema. However, serially-obtained BIA measures, such as the ratio of the reactance to resistance and the resistance adjusted for distance between electrodes, were the best fitting in predicting the compartments in the segmental schema. Validity of these results should be confirmed on humans before implementation in practice.

scholarly journals Effect of position and exercise on measurement of muscle quantity and quality: towards a standardised pragmatic protocol for clinical practice

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carly Welch ◽  
Zeinab Majid ◽  
Isabelle Andrews ◽  
Zaki Hassan-Smith ◽  
Vicky Kamwa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Skeletal Muscle Mass ◽  
Rectus Femoris ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
Impedance Analysis ◽  
Upper Body ◽  
Fat Percentage ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Vastus Intermedius ◽  
Total Body

Abstract Background Ultrasonography is an emerging non-invasive bedside tool for muscle quantity/quality assessment; Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) is an alternative non-invasive bedside measure of body composition, recommended for evaluation of sarcopenia in clinical practice. We set out to assess impact of position and exercise upon measures towards protocol standardisation. Methods Healthy volunteers aged 18–35 were recruited. Bilateral Anterior Thigh Thickness (BATT; rectus femoris and vastus intermedius), BATT: Subcutaneous Ratio (BATT:SCR), and rectus femoris echogenicity were measured using ultrasound and BIA was performed; 1) lying with upper body at 45° (Reclined), 2) lying fully supine at 180o (Supine), 3) sat in a chair with upper body at 90o (Sitting), and 4) after exercise Reclined. Variability of Skeletal Muscle Mass (SMM) by two different equations from BIA (SMM-Janssen, SMM-Sergi), phase angle, fat percentage, and total body (TBW), extracellular (ECW), and intracellular water (ICW) were assessed. Results Forty-four participants (52% female; mean 25.7 years-old (SD 5.0)) were recruited. BATT increased from Reclined to Sitting (+ 1.45 cm, 1.27–1.63), and after exercise (+ 0.51, 0.29–0.73). Echogenicity reduced from Reclined to Sitting (− 2.1, − 3.9 – -0.26). SMM-Sergi declined from Reclined to Supine (− 0.65 kg, − 1.08 – − 0.23) and after exercise (− 0.70 kg, − 1.27 – -0.14). ECW increased from Reclined to Sitting (+ 1.19 L, 0.04–2.35). There were no other statistically significant changes. Conclusion Standardisation of protocols is especially important for assessment of muscle quantity by ultrasonography; BIA measurements may also vary dependent on the equations used. Where possible, participants should be rested prior to muscle ultrasonography and BIA, and flexion of the knees should be avoided.

scholarly journals Wrist-wearable bioelectrical impedance analyzer with miniature electrodes for daily obesity management

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Myoung Hoon Jung ◽  
Kak Namkoong ◽  
Yeolho Lee ◽  
Young Jun Koh ◽  
Kunsun Eom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Contact Resistance ◽  
Body Fat ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
The Body ◽  
Upper Body ◽  
Sensor Technology ◽  
Clinical Test ◽  
Obesity Management ◽  
Impedance Analyzer ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer

AbstractBioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is used to analyze human body composition by applying a small alternating current through the body and measuring the impedance. The smaller the electrode of a BIA device, the larger the impedance measurement error due to the contact resistance between the electrode and human skin. Therefore, most commercial BIA devices utilize electrodes that are large enough (i.e., 4 × 1400 mm2) to counteract the contact resistance effect. We propose a novel method of compensating for contact resistance by performing 4-point and 2-point measurements alternately such that body impedance can be accurately estimated even with considerably smaller electrodes (outer electrodes: 68 mm2; inner electrodes: 128 mm2). Additionally, we report the use of a wrist-wearable BIA device with single-finger contact measurement and clinical test results from 203 participants at Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital. The correlation coefficient and standard error of estimate of percentage body fat were 0.899 and 3.76%, respectively, in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. This result exceeds the performance level of the commercial upper-body portable body fat analyzer (Omron HBF-306). With a measurement time of 7 s, this sensor technology is expected to provide a new possibility of a wearable bioelectrical impedance analyzer, toward obesity management.

scholarly journals Muscle quantity and function measurements are acceptable to older adults during and post- hospitalisation: results of a questionnaire-based study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carly Welch ◽  
Carolyn Greig ◽  
Tahir Masud ◽  
Thomas A. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Gait Speed ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Handgrip Strength ◽  
General Medicine ◽  
Research Participation ◽  
Bioelectrical Impedance ◽  
Impedance Analysis ◽  
Queen Elizabeth Hospital ◽  
Elective Colorectal Surgery

Abstract Background To evaluate the acceptability of handgrip strength, gait speed, quadriceps ultrasound, and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) to older adults conducted during and following hospitalisation. Methods Questionnaire-based study conducted upon completion of prospective cohort study, with follow-up in either Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (QEHB), UK, or participant’s own home following recent admission to QEHB. Outcome measures were acceptability as defined by total multi-domain score for each test (maximum score 35), and by frailty status. Results Forty adults aged 70 years and older admitted for emergency abdominal surgery, elective colorectal surgery, or acute bacterial infections (general medicine) participated. Handgrip strength (median 33, IQR 30–35; p = 0.001), gait speed (median 32, IQR 30–35; p = 0.002), ultrasound quadriceps (median 33, IQR 31–35; p = 0.001), and BIA (median 33.5, IQR 31–35; p = 0.001) were considered highly acceptable. Participants responded positively that they enjoyed participating in these tests, and considered these tests of importance. There was no difference in scores between tests (p = 0.166). Individual total test scores did not differ between patients with and without frailty. Qualitative data are also presented on drivers for research participation. Conclusions Handgrip strength, gait speed, ultrasound quadriceps, and BIA are acceptable tests to older adults during and following hospitalisation. Our results may serve as standards when evaluating acceptability of other tests. Trial registration Prospectively registered February 2019: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03858192

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document