Microwave Thermotherapy in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Chronic Urinary Retention

2001 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 400-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonny Schelin
Keyword(s):  
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽  
Urinary Retention ◽  
Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽  
Chronic Urinary Retention

MODELING AN APPROACH TO THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE URINARY RETENTION IN BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 82-87
Author(s):  
S.M. Pikalov ◽  
A.A. Zimichev ◽  
D.O. Gusev ◽  
P.V. Sumsky ◽  
A.D. Adilov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽  
Urinary Retention ◽  
Acute Urinary Retention ◽  
Prostatic Hyperplasia

SIGNIFICANCE OF NON-INVASIVE SONO-MORPHOLOGICAL MARKERS IN THE EVALUATION OF BLADDER OUTLET OBSTRUCTION AND ACUTE URINARY RETENTION SECONDARY TO BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA

2021 ◽  
pp. 5-9
Author(s):  
Prasenjit Bhowmik ◽  
Soumendranath Mandal ◽  
Gaurav Sharma ◽  
Bandhan Bahal ◽  
Prashant Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Urinary Retention ◽  
Bladder Outlet Obstruction ◽  
Acute Urinary Retention ◽  
Bladder Wall ◽  
Outlet Obstruction ◽  
Threshold Value ◽  
Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽  
Control Group

Objectives: To dene the diagnostic accuracy of intravesical protrusion of prostate (IPP), bladder wall thickness (BWT) and prostate volume (PV) in diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) and prediction of future acute urinary retention (AUR). A prospective Materials and methods: study of 127 patients, presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were enrolled with 50 patients among them manifesting AUR. 35 normal persons were selected as control group. After inclusion, all patients underwent transabdominal ultrasound and pressure ow urodynamic study (UDS). UDS parameter, BOO index (BOOI) were used as a reference standard for stratifying the patients into two groups, BOO and non-BOO. The sono-morphological parameters, IPP, BWT and PV were used to compare between these two groups with calculating the diagnostic accuracy for each individual index. IPP, BWT Results: and PV had statistically signicant difference between group 1 (BOOI < 40) and 2 ( BOOI > 40) with strong correlation with BOOI. The Pearson's correlation coefcient (r) for IPP, BWT and PV were 0.762, 0.702 and 0.660 respectively. The AUC for IPP, BWT and PV were 0.824, 0.786 and 0.650 with highest accuracy for IPP (79.2%) at cutoff value of 7 mm. Using the same threshold value, IPP had higher statistical difference than BWT in predicting AUR with similar diagnostic accuracy of IPP and BWT together. IPP and BWT in conjunction with PV in place Conclusions: of UDS had good clinical utility in diagnosis of BOO due to BPH and future AUR prediction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document