Possibility of Improving the Acceptance Rateof Early Detection Testing for Prostate Cancerwith a One-Step Test for Prostate-Specific Antigen in Whole Blood

1999 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Berg ◽  
Ch. Linder ◽  
G. Eschholz ◽  
St. Link ◽  
J. Schubert
Keyword(s):  
Early Detection ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Whole Blood ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Step Test ◽  
One Step

Rapid one-step assay for prostate specific antigen in whole blood using an optical immunoassay technology

1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grenville Robinson ◽  
Timothy Bacarese-Hamilton ◽  
Paul M. O'Neill ◽  
Janys E. Fletcher ◽  
Phelim B. Daniels ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Whole Blood ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
One Step

Complexed prostate-specific antigen for early detection of prostate cancer in men with serum prostate-specific antigen levels of 2 to 4 nanograms per milliliter

Urology ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 31-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Horninger ◽  
Carol D Cheli ◽  
Richard J Babaian ◽  
Herbert A Fritsche ◽  
Herbert Lepor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Serum Prostate Specific Antigen

scholarly journals Early detection of prostate cancer local recurrence by urinary prostate-specific antigen

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphane Bolduc ◽  
Brant A. Inman ◽  
Louis Lacombe ◽  
Yves Fradet ◽  
Roland R. Tremblay
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Laboratory Assessment ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Prostatectomie Radicale ◽  
Psa Recurrence ◽  
Patients Atteints De Cancer

Purpose: We assessed the role of urinary prostate-specific antigen(uPSA) in the follow-up of prostate cancer after retropubic radicalprostatectomy (RRP) for the early detection of local recurrences.Methods: We recruited 50 patients previously treated for prostatecancer with RRP and who had not experienced a prostatespecificantigen (PSA) recurrence within their first postoperativeyear into a cross-sectional laboratory assessment and prospective6-year longitudinal follow-up study. We defined biochemicalfailure as a serum PSA (sPSA) of 0.3 μg/L or greater. Patientsprovided blood samples and a 50-mL sample of first-voided urine.We performed Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher exact tests for statisticalanalysis.Results: The median sPSA was 0.13 μg/L. The median uPSA was0.8 μg/L, and was not significantly different when comparingGleason scores or pathological stages. Of the 50 patients, 27 initiallyhad a nondetectable sPSA but a detectable uPSA, and11 patients experienced sPSA failure after 6 years. Six patients haddetectable sPSA and uPSA initially. Fifteen patients were negativefor both sPSA and uPSA, and 13 remained sPSA-free after 6 years.The odds ratio (OR) of having sPSA failure given a positive uPSAtest was 4.5 if sPSA was undetectable, but was reduced to 2.6 ifsPSA was detectable. The pooled Mantel–Haenszel OR of 4.2 suggestedthat a detectable uPSA quadrupled the risk of recurrence,independent of whether sPSA was elevated or not. The sensitivityof uPSA for detecting future sPSA recurrences was 81% andspecificity was 45%.Conclusion: Urinary PSA could contribute to an early detection oflocal recurrences of prostate cancer after a radical prostatectomy.Objectif : Nous avons évalué le rôle de l’antigène prostatiquespécifique (APS) urinaire dans le suivi du cancer de la prostateaprès prostatectomie radicale rétropubienne (PRR) pour le dépistageprécoce de récidives locales.Méthodes : Cinquante patients atteints de cancer de la prostatetraités par PRR et n’ayant présenté aucune récidive avec anomaliede l’APS dans l’année suivant l’intervention chirurgicale ontété inscrits à une étude transversale par épreuves de laboratoireavec suivi longitudinal prospectif sur 6 ans. L’échec sur le planbiochimique était défini comme un taux d’APS sérique de 0,3 μg/Lou plus. Les patients devaient fournir des échantillons de sanget un échantillon d’urine du matin de 50 mL. Les analyses statistiquesreposaient sur le test de Wilcoxon et la méthode exactede Fisher.Résultats : La valeur médiane de l’APS sérique était de 0,13 μg/L.La valeur médiane de l’APS urinaire était de 0,8 μg/L; la différenceétait non significative quand on tenait compte des scores deGleason ou des stades pathologiques. Sur les 50 patients,27 présentaient des taux d’APS sérique non décelables au début,mais des taux d’APS urinaire décelables; 11 patients ont présentéun échec quant aux taux d’APS sérique après 6 ans. Six patientsavaient des taux d’APS sérique et urinaire décelables au départ.Quinze patients n’avaient aucun taux décelable d’APS sérique ouurinaire, et aucun APS sérique n’était toujours décelable chez13 patients après 6 ans. Le rapport de risque d’un échec quantaux taux d’APS sérique après détection d’APS urinaire est de 4,5en l’absence d’un taux d’APS sérique décelable, mais diminueà 2,6 en présence d’un taux d’APS sérique décelable. Le rapportde risque cumulé de 4,21 calculé par la méthode deMantel–Haenszel porte à croire que des taux d’APS urinaire décelablesquadruplent le risque de présenter une récidive, queles taux sériques soient élevés ou non. La sensibilité du test dedépistage de l’APS urinaire pour la détection des récidives avecanomalie des taux sériques était de 81 %, et la spécificité, de 45 %.Conclusion : Le taux d’APS urinaire peut contribuer à un dépistageprécoce des récidives locales après une prostatectomie radicale.

Early Detection of Residual Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy by an Ultrasensitive Assay for Prostate Specific Antigen

1993 ◽  
Vol 149 (4) ◽  
pp. 787-792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Stamey ◽  
Howard C.B. Graves ◽  
Nancy Wehner ◽  
Michelle Ferrari ◽  
Fuad S. Freiha
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Ultrasensitive Assay

Comparing Two Modalities of Screening for Prostate Cancer: Digital Rectal Examination + Transrectal Ultrasonography Vs. Prostate-Specific Antigen

1995 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 225-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Ciatto ◽  
Rita Bonardi ◽  
Antonia Mazzotta ◽  
Claudio Lombardi ◽  
Roberto Santoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasonography ◽  
Attendance Rate ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Rectal Examination ◽  
Biopsy Rate

Aims and background To evaluate the performance and feasibility of screening for prostate cancer by comparing screening modalities. Methods Prospective study of two comparable cohorts of healthy resident males aged 60 to 75 years. Screening attenders in the two invited cohorts were screened either by digital rectal examination (DRE) and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), or by serum prostate-specific antigen determination (PSA: cutoff 4 ng/ml). Attendance and biopsy rates, predictive values, prevalence of screen-detected cancers, as well as screening costs were determined, and the efficiency of the two screening modalities was compared. Results 1425 subjects were screened by DRE + TRUS. Attendance rate was 33.7%, the biopsy rate was 2.7%, and the prevalence of detected cancers was 1.82%. A total of 1315 subjects was screened by PSA. Attendance rate was 66.9%, the biopsy rate was 2.8%, and the prevalence of detected cancers was 1.67%. Screen-detected cancer stage was more favorable than observed in clinical practice, and early detection was evident, with the prevalence/incidence ratio higher than 10:1 in both programs. The cost per subject screened was about 34,000 Lire for DRE + TRSU and about 30,000 Lire for PSA program. Conclusions The study confirms that early detection of prostate cancer is possible and that screening is practically feasible. Both screening modalities achieved comparable results as regards early detection, but screening by PSA had a higher compliance and lower costs. PSA seems the ideal test to be used in prospective controlled studies aimed at demonstrating screening efficacy.

scholarly journals Measurement of Prostate-specific Antigen by Use of a Novel Blood Collection and Analytical System

2002 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 1272-1278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara R Grzeda ◽  
Tuan Le Bui ◽  
Cheryl N Warner ◽  
Tracy L Pirucki ◽  
Lisa M Dewey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Whole Blood ◽  
Prostate Cancer Screening ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Blood Collection ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Stabilizing Solution ◽  
Professional Assistance ◽  
Comparison Of The Results

Abstract Background: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is widely used in the detection and monitoring of prostate cancer. We developed a system for the self-collection and transport of capillary whole blood for PSA analysis, with the goal of reducing phlebotomy visits and, thus, increasing the access and utilization of PSA in prostate cancer screening and monitoring. Methods: The blood collection device [BIOSAFE Blood Transport System (BTSTM)] collects 70 μL of blood through a heparin-coated material into 200 μL of stabilizing solution. The diluted whole blood is used for measurement of PSA by a modified version of the Hybritech® Tandem-MP PSA Assay. Results were compared for matched samples of professionally and self-collected BTS blood and for matched BTS samples sera from blood collected by venipuncture. Imprecision for the whole-blood PSA measurement was estimated from analysis of whole-blood controls in duplicate, twice per day, over 20 days. Results: BTS samples (n = 140) collected by a qualified healthcare professional compared with serum samples yielded the regression equation: y =1.02x + 0.04 (Sy|x = 0.35; r = 0.99). Comparison of the results for samples (n = 128) collected by the patient without professional assistance with serum samples yielded: y = 1.08x + 0.02 (Sy|x = 0.31; r = 0.99). The between-run CVs at 0.069, 0.53, 2.9, and 10.7 μg/L were 21%, 6.0%, 3.5%, and 3.8%, respectively. PSA was stable in BTS samples stored for 21 days at 18–24 °C and for 7 days at 37 °C. Conclusion: The BIOSAFE BTS system allows accurate and convenient measurement of circulating PSA by a precise method for diluted whole blood.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document