scholarly journals Research on Effectiveness of Prior Cancer on Survival Outcomes for Patients with Nonmetastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Competing Risk Analysis and Propensity Score Matching Analysis of the SEER Database

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Heyan Chen ◽  
Lutong Yan ◽  
Shengyu Pu ◽  
Lizhe Zhu ◽  
Huimin Zhang ◽  
...  

Introduction. Knowledge of the effect of prior cancer on long-term survival outcomes for patients with nonmetastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remained unclear. The aim of this study was to explore and identify the effectiveness of prior cancer on breast cancer-specific death (BCSD) and other cause-specific death (OCSD) in patients with nonmetastatic TNBC. Materials and Methods. Data of 29,594 participants with nonmetastatic TNBC patients were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2016. Prognostic predictors were identified by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis combined with univariate cumulative incidence function (CIF) and multivariate Fine and Gray competitive risk analyses. Results. Among the women with nonmetastatic TNBC included in the unmatched cohort, a total of 5,375 (18.2%) subjects had prior cancers (P-TNBC) and 24,219 (81.8%) had no prior cancer (NP-TNBC). Patients with P-TNBC tended to have poorer BCSD (Gray’s test, p = 0.0131 ) and OCSD (Gray’s test, p = 0.0009 ) in comparison with those with NP-TNBC after PSM. However, the risk of BCSD p = 0.291 and OCSD p = 0.084 found no difference among P-TNBC patients with one prior cancer and two or more prior cancers after PSM. Additionally, subjects with younger age, advanced T stage, advanced N stage, and advanced differentiation grade tumors were likely to develop BCSD, whereas those with breast-conserving surgery (BCS), radiotherapy, or chemotherapy tended to have a lower incidence of BCSD. Conclusion. Our study demonstrated that prior cancer was related to the worse BCSD and OCSD rate and could be identified as a reliable survival predictor for patients with nonmetastatic TNBC. This study may provide some reference value for the treatment mode of TNBC patients with prior cancer in the future.

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-35
Author(s):  
Gabriel De-la-Cruz-Ku ◽  
Bryan Valcarcel ◽  
Zaida Morante ◽  
Mecker G. Möller ◽  
Sofia Lizandro ◽  
...  

Oncogene ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jhih-Kai Pan ◽  
Cheng-Han Lin ◽  
Yao-Lung Kuo ◽  
Luo-Ping Ger ◽  
Hui-Chuan Cheng ◽  
...  

AbstractBrian metastasis, which is diagnosed in 30% of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients with metastasis, causes poor survival outcomes. Growing evidence has characterized miRNAs involving in breast cancer brain metastasis; however, currently, there is a lack of prognostic plasma-based indicator for brain metastasis. In this study, high level of miR-211 can act as brain metastatic prognostic marker in vivo. High miR-211 drives early and specific brain colonization through enhancing trans-blood–brain barrier (BBB) migration, BBB adherence, and stemness properties of tumor cells and causes poor survival in vivo. SOX11 and NGN2 are the downstream targets of miR-211 and negatively regulate miR-211-mediated TNBC brain metastasis in vitro and in vivo. Most importantly, high miR-211 is correlated with poor survival and brain metastasis in TNBC patients. Our findings suggest that miR-211 may be used as an indicator for TNBC brain metastasis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Fen Fu ◽  
Qing-Xia Chen ◽  
Xiao-Xiao Wang ◽  
Jie Zhang ◽  
Chuan-Gui Song

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document