scholarly journals A Clip-with-Line Traction Suture Method for Closing Mucosal Defects after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Chong Wang ◽  
Yiting Wang ◽  
Yuanyuan Li ◽  
Sheng Zeng ◽  
Youxiang Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Gastrointestinal Diseases ◽  
Endoscopic Procedure ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Traction Suture

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technically difficult endoscopic procedure for treating gastrointestinal diseases. Procedure time is longer, and complications such as mucosal defects, intraoperative perforation, and bleeding occur frequently. Here, to solve these problems, we described the clip-with-line traction suture method that applied and performed for closing mucosal defects after ESD in three representative cases.

Vonoprozan: potentially new first-line treatment for delayed upper gastrointestinal bleeds following endoscopic procedures? A letter to the editor

2022 ◽  
Vol 71 (12) ◽  
pp. 2838-2838
Author(s):  
Muhammad Umer ◽  
Syed Wasif Bukhari
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Gastrointestinal Diseases ◽  
High Dose ◽  
First Line ◽  
Gastroesophageal Varices ◽  
Delayed Bleeding ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
H Pylori ◽  
Line Of Therapy

Endoscopy nowadays is widely used as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool for various gastrointestinal diseases due to it being less invasive and safer. However, amongst some adverse events is delayed bleeding. The definition of delayed bleeding requires endoscopic hemostasis and/or blood transfusion after at least two days of treatment. (1) Oesophageal cancer is comparatively more common in Pakistan, being 7th most common malignancy in men and 6th most common in women in Karachi. (2) Oesophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (E-ESD) employed in the treatment of the above- mentioned cancer has an incidence of delayed bleeding of about 1.3-6.7%. (1) The prevalence of gastric cancer across Pakistan was about 2-18% (3), for which endoscopic submucosal dissection is often used has an incidence of delayed bleeding of 4.7-15.6%. (1) Endoscopic therapy for gastroesophageal varices can also result in delayed bleeding, the incidence of which easily reaches up to 10%. (1) In a retrospective cohort study of 124,422 patients conducted in Japan, it was found that vonoprazan was more effective in reducing the risk of delayed bleeding compared to omeprazole. (OR= 0.75) (1) Vonoprazan works by competitively inhibiting the potassium-acid channel resulting in strong and sustained acid inhibition. (4) It was also found to have a superior effect in the eradication of H Pylori and an equal effect in acid-related disorders. (5)  In the retrospective study mentioned above, it is also worth noting that the efficacy of vonoprazan was variable with respect to procedures and was most prominent with gastroduodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection (OR=0.70). (1) Other procedures did not elicit any significant difference. In addition, standard/high dose vonoprazan proved to be most efficacious in reducing the risk of delayed bleeding compared with standard/high-dose PPI and low-dose vonoprazan. It was also observed that patients taking anti-thrombotic medications at a higher risk of delayed bleeding also benefited from high-dose vonoprazan. (OR=0.74) (1) The findings above compel the conclusion that high dose vonoprazan should be ideal for reducing the risk of delayed bleeding in patients who have undergone gastroduodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection and/or are on anti-thrombotics. Though high-dose vonoprazan does look promising, it is imperative that more randomized controlled trials on more diverse populations be conducted to further explore its efficacy and safety as the drug might be a potential first line of therapy.

scholarly journals A Novel Technique of Endoscopic Papillectomy with Hybrid Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Ampullary Tumors: A Proof-of-Concept Study (with Video)

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 2671
Author(s):  
Naminatsu Takahara ◽  
Yosuke Tsuji ◽  
Yousuke Nakai ◽  
Yukari Suzuki ◽  
Akiyuki Inokuma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Postoperative Bleeding ◽  
Incomplete Resection ◽  
Proof Of Concept ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Concept Study ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Endoscopic Papillectomy ◽  
Ampullary Tumors

Background: Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) carries a potential risk of procedure-related adverse events and incomplete resection. Since hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) had been established as an alternative option for relatively large and difficult gastrointestinal tumors, we evaluated a novel EP with hybrid ESD (hybrid ESD-EP) for curative safe margin in this proof-of-concept study. Methods: A total of eight cases who underwent hybrid ESD-EP between 2018 and 2020 were identified from our prospectively maintained database. Hybrid ESD-EP involved a (sub)circumferential incision with partial submucosal dissection, and subsequent snare resection of ampullary tumors, which was performed by two endoscopists with expertise in ESD or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Demographic data and clinicopathological outcomes were retrospectively evaluated. Results: En bloc resection was achieved by hybrid ESD-EP in all eight cases, with the median procedure time of 112 (range: 65–170) minutes. The median diameters of the resected specimens and tumors were 18 and 12 mm, respectively. All lateral margins were clear, whereas vertical margin was uncertain in three (38%), resulting in the complete resection rate of 63%. Postoperative bleeding and pancreatitis developed in each one (13%). No tumor recurrence was observed even in those cases with uncertain vertical margin, after a median follow-up of 244 (range, 97–678) days. Conclusions: Hybrid ESD-EP seems to be feasible and promising in ensuring the lateral resection margin. However, further investigations, especially to secure the vertical margin and to shorten the procedure time, should be required.

scholarly journals Ex vivo porcine model study on the treatment outcomes of scissor-type knife versus needle-type knife in endoscopic submucosal dissection performed by trainees

BMC Surgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryoji Ichijima ◽  
Mitsuru Esaki ◽  
Shun Yamakawa ◽  
Yosuke Minoda ◽  
Sho Suzuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Porcine Model ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Needle Type ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Muscular Injury ◽  
Total Procedure

Abstract Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastrointestinal neoplasms can be technically difficult for trainee endoscopists. Presently, there is no consensus for trainees to select the endo-knife type in ESD. Therefore, we conducted a comparison study of treatment outcomes between scissors-type and needle-type knives in ESD performed by trainees in an ex vivo porcine model. Methods This study was conducted on trainee endoscopists who participated in ESD hands-on seminars held in August 2018 and September 2019. A total of 22 trainees from 13 institutions were divided into two groups according to their endoscopic experience. Under expert supervision, each trainee performed two ESDs in porcine models, namely, scissor-type knife (ESD-S) and needle-type knife (ESD-N). The efficacy and safety, including the procedure time and rates of self-completion, en bloc resection, and complications, were compared between ESD-S and ESD-N. In subgroup analysis, we also investigated the predictors associated with the difficulty of ESD for trainees using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results Eight trainees had an experience of over 1000 endoscopies (senior trainee: S-Trainee), whereas the others had an experience of less than 1000 endoscopies (junior trainee: J-Trainee). Among the S-Trainees, no significant differences were observed in any treatment outcome between ESD-S and ESD-N. Among the J-Trainees, the total procedure and mucosal incision times were significantly shorter in ESD-S than in ESD-N [total procedure time: 16.5 min (range 10.0–31.0) vs. 22.3 min (range 10.0–38.0), P = 0.018; circumferential incision time: 10.0 min (range 6–16) vs. 17.0 min (range 5.0–31.5); P = 0.019]. Regarding complications, muscular injury occurred in two patients during ESD-N performed by J-Trainees; however, no muscular injury occurred during ESD-S. In subgroup analysis, ESD-N was an independent predictive factor of difficult ESD (odds ratio 5.28, 95% confidence interval 1.25–22.30; P = 0.024). Conclusions This study revealed that trainees, particularly those who have experienced less than 1000 endoscopies, should opt for the scissor-type knife to perform ESD.

A novel endoscopic hand-suturing technique for defect closure after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a pilot study

Endoscopy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (09) ◽  
pp. 780-785
Author(s):  
Seiichiro Abe ◽  
Yutaka Saito ◽  
Yusaku Tanaka ◽  
Mai Ego ◽  
Fumito Yanagisawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Barbed Suture ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Closure Rate ◽  
Needle Holder ◽  
Lower Rectum ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Mucosal Defect ◽  
Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Abstract Background This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of endoscopic hand-suturing (EHS) and attainability of sustained closure after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Methods EHS was defined as uninterrupted endoscopic suturing of the mucosal defect after colorectal ESD using an absorbable barbed suture and a through-the-scope needle holder. Following individual EHS training using an ex vivo porcine colonic model, two experienced endoscopists performed EHS. Repeat colonoscopy was performed on the third or fourth day after ESD to examine the EHS site. The primary end point was the complete EHS closure rate, and secondary end points were sustained closure and post-ESD bleeding rates. Results 11 lesions were included. Median size of the mucosal defect was 38 mm (range 25 – 55 mm) and the lesion characteristics were as follows: lower rectum/upper rectum/ascending colon/cecum = 3/3/2/3, and 0-IIa/0-Is + IIa/others = 5/4/2. EHS was not attempted in two patients owing to difficulty in colonoscope reinsertion after ESD and intraoperative perforation, respectively. EHS was performed for nine lesions, and the complete EHS closure rate was 73 %. Median procedure time for suturing was 56 minutes (range 30 – 120 minutes) and median number of stitches was 8 (range 6 – 12). Sustained closure and post-ESD bleeding rates were 64 % and 9 %, respectively. Conclusions EHS achieved complete and sustained closure in the colorectum. However, EHS is not currently clinically applicable given the long procedure time. Further modifications of the technique and devices are desirable.

Clinical benefit of the multibending endoscope for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial

Endoscopy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi Hamada ◽  
Yoshinori Horikawa ◽  
Yoshiki Shiwa ◽  
Kae Techigawara ◽  
Takayuki Nagahashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Complete Removal ◽  
Muscle Layer ◽  
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Operator Experience ◽  
Submucosal Dissection

Abstract Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technically difficult and time-consuming procedure. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of ESD using a multibending endoscope to treat superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms. Methods Patients with a single early gastric cancer who met the absolute or expanded indications for ESD according to the Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines were enrolled and randomly assigned to undergo ESD using a conventional endoscope (C-ESD) or a multibending endoscope (M-ESD). Randomization was stratified by ESD operator experience and tumor location. The primary outcome was ESD procedure time, calculated as the time from the start of submucosal injection to complete removal of the tumor. Results 60 patients were analyzed (30 C-ESD, 30 M-ESD). The mean (standard deviation [SD]) ESD procedure times for M-ESD and C-ESD were 34.6 (SD 17.2) and 47.2 (SD 26.7) minutes, respectively (P = 0.03). Muscle layer damage occurred significantly less frequently with M-ESD (0.2 [SD 0.7] vs. 0.7 [SD 1.0]; P = 0.04). There were no significant differences between the two techniques in procedure time or damage to muscle layers for tumors located in the lower third of the stomach. Conclusions ESD procedure time was significantly shorter with the multibending endoscope and fewer muscles were damaged. We recommend multibending endoscopy for ESD in the upper and middle thirds of the stomach to reduce procedure time and incidence of complications.

Short-term outcomes following endoscopic submucosal dissection of large protruding colorectal neoplasms

Endoscopy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (06) ◽  
pp. 606-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taku Sakamoto ◽  
Yutaka Saito ◽  
Fumihiko Nakamura ◽  
Seiichiro Abe ◽  
Hiroyuki Takamaru ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Neoplasms ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Technical Difficulty ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Short Term ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection

Abstract Background Although submucosal dissection is useful for treating laterally spreading colorectal tumors, there is little information regarding the endoscopic treatment of large protruding colorectal neoplasms. Here, we aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for protruding colorectal neoplasms ≥ 20 mm in diameter. Methods In total, 112 consecutive patients undergoing treatment between January 2005 and June 2017 were enrolled retrospectively. The study period was divided into six periods to evaluate any changes in outcomes over time. We reviewed all short-term clinical outcomes, including lesion characteristics, procedure time, and percentages of en bloc resection, curative resection, adverse events, and treatment discontinuation. Results The percentages of en bloc, en bloc R0, and en bloc curative resections were 88 %, 82 %, and 59 %, respectively. Perforation occurred in 11 patients (10 %), and the endoscopic procedure was discontinued in five patients (4 %) because of technical difficulty. For lesions ≥ 40 mm in diameter, the procedure time showed a statistically significant decreasing trend in the latter half of the study period. However, the rate of cure did not improve along with enhancements to the procedure’s technological aspects. Conclusions Although endoscopic submucosal dissection for large protruding lesions has advanced in terms of its technical aspects, its ability to cure large protruding neoplasms has not shown gratifying results.

scholarly journals Two electrosurgical endo-knives for endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal superficial neoplasms: a prospective randomized study

2017 ◽  
Vol 05 (08) ◽  
pp. E729-E735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuusaku Sugihara ◽  
Keita Harada ◽  
Yoshiro Kawahara ◽  
Daisuke Takei ◽  
Shiho Takashima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Total Procedure Time ◽  
Mucosal Incision ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Total Procedure

Abstract Background and study aims Few studies have directly compared endo-knives for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in humans. We compared the performances of the Mucosectom2 and SB knife Jr. Patients and methods Two trainee endoscopists performed ESD of 36 lesions in this prospective, randomized controlled trial. Mucosal incision with a 1.5-mm Dual knife and submucosal dissection using the Mucosectom2 were performed in 1 group. Mucosal incision with a 1.5-mm Dual knife and submucosal dissection with a SB knife Jr. were performed in the other group. The primary outcome was the ESD procedure time. Secondary outcomes were total procedure time, self-completion rates, and adverse events. Results ESD time in Mucosectom2 patients was not significantly shorter than in SB knife Jr. patients (57 ± 32 min vs. 61 ± 44 min, respectively; P = 0.94). Total procedure time in Mucosectom2 patients was not significantly shorter than in SB knife Jr. patients (81 ± 42 min vs. 82 ± 51 min, respectively; P = 0.85). The trainee self-completion rate was slightly higher in SB knife Jr. patients than in Mucosectom2 patients, although the difference was not significant (94 % vs. 100 %, respectively; P = 0.959). Fewer hemostatic procedures using the Coagrasper were performed in Mucosectom2 patients than in SB knife Jr. patients, although the difference was not significant (0.62 vs. 0.7, respectively; P = 0.432). Conclusions Mucosectom2 and SB knife Jr. did not significantly differ in performance for colorectal ESD to safely and reliably enhance ESD. Knife selection is not as important for learning colorectal ESD as patient- and lesion-related factors.

Tu1686 Investigation of Procedure Time Associated With Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Neoplasms: Analysis of 1123 Lesions

2012 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. AB488-AB489
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Toyokawa ◽  
Tomoki Inaba ◽  
Koichi Izumikawa ◽  
Joichiro Horii ◽  
Isao Fujita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Gastric Neoplasms ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Submucosal Dissection
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document