scholarly journals Ellipsoid Zone Integrity and Visual Acuity Changes during Diabetic Macular Edema Therapy: A Longitudinal Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Lucy J. Kessler ◽  
Gerd U. Auffarth ◽  
Dmitrii Bagautdinov ◽  
Ramin Khoramnia

Purpose. Ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity is identified as a potential biomarker for therapy surveillance and outcome prediction of visual acuity (VA). However, only a few studies report long-term results of over 1 year of clinical and anatomical changes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). This study is aimed at describing the long-term VA and anatomical outcomes in spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) (relative ellipsoid zone reflectivity ratio, central macular thickness, and volume) in patients with DME treated with antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy. Furthermore, we studied the correlation between EZ integrity and changes in visual acuity. Methods. 71 eyes of 71 patients were included in this retrospective study. Clinical characteristics were reviewed yearly. OCT data were assessed at baseline and after 1, 3, and 5 years. EZ parameters were quantified automatically. OCT parameters and visual outcome were correlated and analyzed in multivariable regression models. Results. EZ reflectivity ratio correlated with functional outcome in DME patients from baseline to fifth year at all time points (for all p < 0.05 ). EZ reflectivity improved the most in the first year of treatment (0.68 to 0.75; p < 0.05 ) and declined gradually until year 5 of therapy (0.71; compared to baseline p > 0.05 ). Similarly, best VA was achieved after 1 year (0.40 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) to 0.28 logMAR; p < 0.001 ) and declined gradually until year 5. Final VA in year 5 was comparable to baseline (0.45 logMAR, compared to baseline p > 0.05 ). Together with baseline VA, baseline EZ parameters did predict VA outcome after 1 year ( p < 0.05 ). Concordantly, VA and EZ parameters from year 1 were associated with VA outcome in year 2. Conclusion. This study described the long-term course of EZ changes during anti-VEGF treatment in DME patients. In addition, our results underlined the potential of EZ parameters as novel OCT biomarkers for prediction of VA outcomes during therapy.

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 42-49
Author(s):  
A. Zh. Fursova ◽  
A. S. Derbeneva ◽  
M. S. Tarasov ◽  
M. V. Vasil’eva ◽  
J. A. Gamza ◽  
...  

Purpose:to evaluate the clinical efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy of patients with diabetic macular edema (DMO) in T & E regimen for 96 weeks. Materials and methods. The study included 59 patients (101 eyes) with DMO. The average number of intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agent (IIAVA) — aflibercept given during the whole period was 12.87 ± 3.56, including 7.78 ± 1.20 in the first year, and 4.82 ± 2.66 in the second year. Results.All patients showed an increase in visual functions (+0.33, p < 0.001) with a maximum achieved after 5 injections (+0.24; p = 0.001). Central macular thickness decreased from 397.36 ± 100,00 μm at the initial level to 276.59 ± 52.90 after 5 loading injections (-120.8 μm), to 263.85 ± 45.20 (-133, 91 μm) after 1 year and to 248.6 ± 46.9 (-148.76 μm) after 2 years. A resorption of retinal neuroepithelial detachment was observed in 84.16 % of cases as soon as loading injections were given, and reached 100 % of cases by the 48th week of observation. Strong inverse correlations were revealed between the initial presence of medium and large intraretinal cysts and visual acuity, both initial and final (-0.35 and -0.42, p < 0.01). The disorganization of retina inner layers at the initial level was a predictor of a worse visual outcome at the end of the observation period. By the end of this period, 44 patients (43.5 %) received IIAVA with an interval of 12 weeks, the maximum interval between injections was 16 weeks and was achieved in 19 (28.01 %) eyes. Conclusion.The results of a 2-year retrospective study of the efficacy of aflibercept in DME showed that T&E regimen can be used with highfunctional results. Due to flexible planning of the number of IIAVA in the second year, over-treatment could be avoided without reducing the expected efficacy.


2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 534-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oluwaranti Akiyode ◽  
Jateh Major ◽  
Abiola Ojo

Aflibercept is the most recently approved vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) inhibitor for the management of diabetic macular edema and diabetic retinopathy. The purpose of this article is to review the efficacy and safety of aflibercept in the management of diabetic eye complications and to describe its place in therapy. Anti-VEGF agents have been noted in clinical trials to be superior to laser photocoagulation, the standard therapy ( P < .0001, P ≤ .0085, respectively). Aflibercept has been comparatively studied with other anti-VEGF agents, namely, bevacizumab and ranibizumab, and noted to be equally efficacious and safe in patients with mild visual acuity loss ( P > .50). However, in the treatment of patients with diabetic macular edema having moderate to severe visual acuity loss, aflibercept outperformed the other 2 anti-VEGF agents (aflibercept vs bevacizumab, P < .001; aflibercept vs ranibizumab, P = .003). However, additional studies are needed to fully appreciate the long-term safety and efficacy of aflibercept and the anti-VEGF therapy class.


2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212110261
Author(s):  
Sandeep Saxena ◽  
Carsten H Meyer ◽  
Levent Akduman

The external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) can be observed exquisitely by SD-OCT. In diabetic macular edema (DME), dysfunction of mitochondria, represented by the EZ in the foveal photoreceptors results in reduced visual acuity (VA). An increase in VEGF was found to correlate with increased severity of DR, increased central subfield thickness (CST), and sequential disruption of ELM and EZ. The mechanism of ELM and EZ restoration after anti-VEGF therapy in DME has been discovered. The ELM restores first followed by EZ restoration. Thus, authors have discovered and established ELM as a novel retinal structural barrier.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ali Haider ◽  
Uzma Sattar ◽  
Syeda Rushda Zaidi

Purpose: To evaluate the change in visual acuity in relation to decrease in central macular thickness,after a single dose of intravitreal Bevacizumab injection.Study Design: Quasi experimental study.Place and Duration of Study: Punjab Rangers Teaching Hospital, Lahore, from January 2019 to June 2019.Material and Methods: 70 eyes with diabetic macular edema were included in the study. Patients having high refractive errors (spherical equivalent of > ± 7.5D) and visual acuity worse than +1.2 or better than +0.2 on log MAR were excluded. Central macular edema was measured in μm on OCT and visual acuity was documentedusing Log MAR chart. These values were documented before and at 01 month after injection with intravitrealBevacizumab. Wilcoxon Signed rank test was used to evaluate the difference in VA beforeand after the anti-VEGF injection. Difference in visual acuity and macular edema (central) was observed,analyzed and represented in p value. P value was considered statistically significant if it was less than 0.01%.Results: Mean age of patients was 52.61 ± 1.3. Vision improved from 0.90 ± 0.02 to 0.84 ± 0.02 on log MARchart. The change was statistically significant with p value < 0.001. Central macular thickness reduced from 328 ±14 to 283 ± 10.6 μm on OCT after intravitreal anti-VEGF, with significant p value < 0.001.Conclusion: A 45 μm reduction in central macular thickness was associated with 0.1 Log MAR unit improvementin visual acuity after intravitreal Bevacizumab in diabetic macular edema.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ada Admin ◽  
Marta Vila Gonzalez ◽  
Magdalini Eleftheriadou ◽  
Sophia Kelaini ◽  
Hojjat Naderi-Meshkin ◽  
...  

Diabetic macular edema (DME) remains a leading cause of vision loss worldwide. DME is commonly treated with intravitreal injections of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) neutralising antibodies. Anti-VEGFs are effective but not all patients fully respond to them. Given their potential side effects, inconvenience and high cost, identifying who may not respond appropriately to anti-VEGFs and why is essential. <p>Herein, we determine first the response to anti-VEGFs in a cohort of DME patients using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography scans obtained throughout the first year of treatment. We found that in 28% of eyes full clearance of fluid occurred at any time during the first year (“full responders”); in 66% fluid cleared only partly (“partial responders”); in 6% fluid remained unchanged (“non-responders”). To understand this differential response, we generated induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS) from “full responders” and “non-responders” and from diabetic subjects with no DME and age-matched non-diabetic volunteers and differentiated them into endothelial cells (iPS-ECs). Monolayers of iPS-ECs derived from diabetics showed marked and prolonged increased permeability upon exposure to VEGF when compared with non-diabetic controls; the response was significantly exaggerated in iPS-ECs from “non-responders” when compared with “full responders”. Moreover, phosphorylation of key cellular proteins in response to VEGF, including VEGFR2, and gene expression profiles, such as Neuronal Pentraxin 2 (NPTX2) expression, differed between “full responders” and “non-responders”. </p> <p>In the current study, iPS were used to predict patient response to anti-VEGF and identify key mechanisms underpinning the differential outcomes observed in the clinic. This approach has identified NPTX2 as playing a significant role in patient-linked responses and has potential as a new therapeutic target for DME. </p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurent Kodjikian ◽  
David Bellocq ◽  
Thibaud Mathis

Objectives of the Study. Summary of observational studies concerning the pharmacological management of diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods. A literature review was conducted using the PubMed database on 1 February 2018 to identify studies evaluating the efficacy of anti-VEGF and dexamethasone (DEX) implants for DME. Studies with more than 10 patients and follow-up of more than 6 months were selected. Analyses were carried out on the overall population and on subgroups defined according to baseline visual acuity (BVA) and the patients’ naïve or non-naïve status. Results. Thirty-two studies evaluating the efficacy of anti-VEGF and 31 studies evaluating the efficacy of DEX-implants were retained, concerning 6,842 and 1,703 eyes, respectively. A mean gain of +4.7 letters for a mean of 5.8 injections (mean follow-up: 15.6 months) and +9.6 letters for a mean of 1.6 injections (10.3 months) was found in the anti-VEGF and DEX-implant studies, respectively. Final VA appears to be similar for both treatment (62 letters for anti-VEGF, 61.2 letters for DEX-implant), and BVA appears lower for DEX-implant, which may partially explain the greater visual gain. The DEX-implant studies show greater gains in VA compared to the anti-VEGF studies, especially for higher BVA. Indeed, mean gains for the subgroups of patients with BVA<50 letters, 50<BVA<60 letters, and BVA>60 letters are +4.3, +5.8, and +3.1 letters, respectively, in the anti-VEGF studies and +10.5, +9.3, and +8.8 letters, respectively, in the DEX-implant studies. Regarding the patient’s initial status, only naïve status appears to confer the best functional response in DEX-implant studies. Conclusion. Observational studies investigating DEX-implant report clinically similar final VA when compared to anti-VEGF, but superior visual gains in real-life practice. This latter difference could be due to the better BVA, but also to the fact that less injections were administered in the anti-VEGF observational studies than in the interventional studies.


Author(s):  
Бикбов ◽  
Mukharram Bikbov ◽  
Файзрахманов ◽  
Rinat Fayzrakhmanov ◽  
Зайнуллин ◽  
...  

Objective: to analyze the structural state of the central area of the retina in diabetic macular edema in the background anti-VEGF therapy.Methods. The study included 38patients (40eyes) with diabetic macular edema. All patients received anti-VEGF-ranibizumab therapy at a dose of 0.05ml. The results were analyzed after three intravitreal injections with 1month interval. We assessed visual acuity, morphological and anatomical structure of the macular area, the sensitivity of the retina and macular pigment optical densityResults. Analyzing optical density of the macular pigment we revealed a significant increase of all parameters in 73% of patients after the therapy. The average value of the optical density before treatment was at 0.102±0.01du, on the background of anti-VEGF-therapy this figure went up to 0.213±0.01 (p&#60;0.05). According to the optical coherence to-mography average retinal thickness before treatment made 404.62±15.23μm, after the treatment – 300.91±6.43μm (р&#60;0,05). When comparing data of optical coherence tomography and macular pigment optical density we revealed more pronounced decrease in the macular pigment optical density in the area of the retinal edema and a significant increase in the basic parameters on the background of the therapy.Conclusion. Anti-VEGF-therapy significantly improves visual acuity, the recovery profile of macular edema and reduces the zone in patients with diabetic macular edema.


2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 78-84
Author(s):  
Vladimir Iosifovich Konenkov ◽  
Vadim Valerievich Klimontov ◽  
Valeriy Vyacheslavovich Chernykh ◽  
Nadezhda Viktorovna Tjan

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common complication associated with the loss of visual acuity in diabetic patients. Intravitreal injections of vascular endothelium growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors (anti-VEGF therapy) have been proposed recently as a new treatment option for patients with DME. In this review we summarized results of randomized clinical trials of VEGF inhibitors in DME patients. The results indicate that all studied inhibitors (ranibizumab, bevacizumab, pegaptanib and aflibersept) reduce the retinal thickness and improve of visual acuity in DME when are used as a monotherapy or in combination with the laser treatment. Optimal course duration and effectiveness predictors of anti-VEGF therapy in DME should be elucidate in the future studies.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 315-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bassey Fiebai ◽  
Victor Odogu

Purpose: The study aimed to describe our initial experience with the use of anti vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs) in the treatment of retinal diseases. Methods: The case records of all patients who had received at least 3 doses of intravitreal anti- VEGF injections between January 2012 to December 2016 were reviewed. Information culled from the data was age, sex, indications for treatment, type of injection, presenting visual acuity, post injection visual acuity, systemic and ocular co morbidities. Results were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 20.0 for Windows statistical software Results: A total of 190 injections were given during the study period, to 58 eyes of 50 patients. Twenty-eight females (56.00%) and twenty-two males (44.00%) were seen with a mean age of 59.6± 11.66. Bevacizumab was the most frequently administered anti- VEGF, 142 (74.74%) while only 48(25.26%) injections of Ranibizumab were given. Three eyes had both bevacizumab and ranibizumab (1.58%). Retinal vein occlusion 61(32.11%) was the commonest indication for the injections followed by diabetic macular edema 43(22.63%) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy 42(22.11%). Others were neovascular age related macular degeneration, neovascular glaucoma, vitreous hemorrhage, myopic choroidal neovascularization and cystoid macular edema. There was an association between age and disease, (p = 0.001). There was an improvement in visual acuity after intervention in cases with retinal vein occlusion and diabetic macular edema, and this was statistically significant. Hypertension was the commonest systemic disorder in this series 81(42.36%) and the supero-temporal quadrant 131(68.95%) was the most preferred position to administer the injection. Floaters was the commonest complication seen. Conclusion: Anti VEGFs have become an invaluable tool in the management of a number of retinal diseases in our center. However, the cost implications are a hindrance to an increased uptake of this form of treatment. Cheaper alternative preparations should be made available to encourage the uptake. Government in developing countries should be encouraged to bear the health burden of the old aged pensioner (OAP).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document