scholarly journals Pars Plana Vitrectomy versus Intravitreal Injection of Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema Associated with Vitreomacular Interface Abnormalities

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Hassan Elkayal ◽  
Ahmed M. Bedda ◽  
Hesham El-Goweini ◽  
Ahmed A. Souka ◽  
Amir Ramadan Gomaa
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Injection ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Pars Plana Vitrectomy ◽  
Vision Loss ◽  
Group I ◽  
Pars Plana ◽  
Vitreomacular Interface ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group Ii

Purpose. To compare the efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) versus intravitreal injection (IVI) of ranibizumab (RBZ) in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) associated with vitreomacular interface abnormalities (VMIA). Methods. The records of patients presenting with DME and VMIA throughout 2016 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group I received IVIs of RBZ and group II underwent PPV with internal limiting membrane peeling. The main outcome measures were the change in the LogMAR corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and central subfield thickness (CSFT) on optical coherence tomography over 6 months. Results. At 6 months, mean CDVA improved by 0.22 ± 0.21 in group I patients p < 0.001 , while in group II, it improved only by 0.09 ± 0.22 p < 0.115 . Fifty-five percent of group I and 60% of group II patients had stable CDVA (within 2 lines from baseline) at 6 months. Significant improvement in vision (gain of 2 or more lines) was seen in 45% and 30%, respectively. Worsening of vision (loss of 2 or more lines) was seen only in 2 patients in group II, but none in group I. The mean CSFT improved significantly in both groups (by 162 µ and 216 µ, respectively; p < 0.001 ). The mean CSFT at 6 months was similar in both groups (354 µ and 311 µ, respectively; p = 0.172 ). Conclusions. Both treatments resulted in anatomical improvement of DME with concurrent VMIA. Visual improvement was more pronounced in the IVI group, although this may have been affected by other confounding factors.

Efficacy and safety of vitamin supplements with resveratrol in diabetic macular edema: Long-term results of a comparative study

2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212110576
Author(s):  
Irini Chatziralli ◽  
Eleni Dimitriou ◽  
Alexandros Chatzirallis ◽  
Evaggelia Aissopou ◽  
Dimitrios Kazantzis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Thickness ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Vitamin Supplements ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Group I ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group Ii

Purpose To investigate the adjunct efficacy and safety of vitamin supplements, including resveratrol, in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial factor (anti-VEGF) agents. Methods Participants in this prospective study were 45 patients with DME, who were treated with either intravitreal anti-VEGF injections (n = 23, Group I) or with combination of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections and vitamin supplements, including resveratrol (n = 22, Group II). All patients underwent visual acuity measurement, slit-lamp examination and spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) at baseline and monthly after the loading phase of three-monthly anti-VEGF injections, following a PRN protocol. Results There was a statistically significant improvement in visual acuity in both groups at month 12 compared to baseline, although the mean change in visual acuity did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.183). Accordingly, there was a statistically significant decrease in central retinal thickness in both groups at month 12 compared to baseline, while the mean difference in central retinal thickness was significantly greater in the “combination” group. The mean number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injection was less in Group II (6.45 ± 1.12 in Group II vs. 7.39 ± 1.31 in Group I, p = 0.018). Conclusions Vitamin supplements with resveratrol was found to be an effective adjunct to intravitreal anti-VEGF injections in patients with DME, offering better anatomic restoration with less injections at the 12-month follow-up.

scholarly journals Real-world outcomes of two-year Conbercept therapy for diabetic macular edema

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 416-422
Author(s):  
Yong Cheng ◽  
◽  
Ming-Wei Zhao ◽  
Tong Qian ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Vision Loss ◽  
Retinal Thickness ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Number Of Injections ◽  
Best Corrected Visual Acuity

AIM: To evaluate the two-year outcomes of patients treated for diabetic macular edema (DME) with intravitreal Conbercept (IVC). METHODS: The clinical data of 30 DME patients (36 eyes) were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were treated with IVC for 3mo. Additional IVC was given at subsequent monthly visits, if needed (3+PRN). The patients were followed up for 24mo. RESULTS: The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 24mo significantly increased (66.7±15.3 letters) in comparison with the baseline (54.4±15.4 letters, P<0.0001). The mean improvement in BCVA was 11.0±2.9 letters. At 24mo, 44.1% of the eyes surveyed gained ≥15 letters, 52.9% of the eyes gained ≥10 letters, and 70.6% of the eyes gained ≥5 letters. No vision loss was noted in 96.8% of the eyes, and 5.9% of the eyes lost ≥5 letters, but ≤10 letters. The central retinal thickness (CRT) at 24mo was significantly reduced (277.1±122.9 μm) in comparison with the baseline (510.9±186.1 μm, P<0.0001). At 24mo, 43.3% of the patients had a CRT ≤250 μm. The mean number of injections over 24mo was 10.6±2.0. No severe eye or systemic adverse events related to either the drug or injection were noted. CONCLUSION: IVC is safe and effective for the treatment of DME.

scholarly journals Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Nontractional Diabetic Macular Edema

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Niklas Ulrich
Keyword(s):  
Optical Coherence Tomography ◽  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Pars Plana Vitrectomy ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane ◽  
Central Macular Thickness ◽  
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling ◽  
Membrane Peeling ◽  
Pars Plana

Background: Diabetes mellitus remains the leading cause of blindness among working age Americans with diabetic macular edema being the most common cause for moderate and severe vision loss. Objective: To investigate the anatomical and visual benefits of pars plana vitrectomy with inner limiting membrane peeling in patients with nontractional diabetic macular edema as well as correlation of integrity of outer retinal layers on spectral domain optical coherence tomography to visual outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 42 diabetic patients that underwent vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for nontractional diabetic macula edema. The integrity of outer retinal layers was evaluated and preoperative central macular thickness and visual acuity were compared with data at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. The student t-test was used to compare the groups. Results: 31 eyes were included. While no differences were seen at 1 and 3 months, there was significant improvement of both central macular thickness and visual acuity at the 6 months follow up visit compared to preoperatively (357, 427 microns; p=0.03. 20/49, 20/82; p=0.03) . Patients with intact external limiting membrane and ellipsoid zone had better preoperative vision than patients with outer retinal layer irregularities (20/54, 20/100; p=0.03) and greater visual gains postoperatively (20/33, p<0.001 versus 20/81; p=non-significant). Conclusion: Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling can improve retinal anatomy and visual acuity in patients with nontractional diabetic macular edema. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography may help identify patients with potential for visual improvement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document