scholarly journals Prognostic Value of Atherosclerotic Extent in Diabetic Patients with Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Yipu Ding ◽  
Zinuan Liu ◽  
Guanhua Dou ◽  
Xia Yang ◽  
Xi Wang ◽  
...  

Background and Objective. Atherosclerotic extent was proved to be associated with adverse cardiac events. Risk scores derived by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) could identify high-risk group among patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), but the ability is still uncertain in the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM). The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the atherosclerotic extent shown by CCTA in diabetic patients with nonobstructive CAD. Methods and Results. 813 DM patients (mean age 58.9 ± 9.9 years, 48.1% male) referred for CCTA due to suspected CAD in 2015-2017 were consecutively included. During a median follow-up of 31.77 months, 50 major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (6.15%) were experienced, including 2 cardiovascular deaths, 14 nonfatal myocardial infarctions, 27 unstable anginas requiring hospitalization, and 7 strokes. Three groups were defined based on coronary stenosis combined with Leiden score as normal, nonobstructive Leiden < 5 , and nonobstructive Leiden ≥ 5 . Cox models were used to assess the prognosis of plaque burden within these groups. An incremental incidence of MACE rates was observed. After adjustment for age, gender, and presence of high-risk plaque, the group of Leiden ≥ 5 showed a higher risk than Leiden < 5 (HR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.03-3.42, p = 0.039 ). Similar results were observed when segment involvement score (SIS) was used for sensitivity analysis. Conclusion. Atherosclerotic extent was associated with the prognosis of DM patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease, highlighting the importance of better risk stratification and management.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yipu Ding ◽  
Zinuan Liu ◽  
Guanhua Dou ◽  
Xia Yang ◽  
Xi Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Objective: Atherosclerotic extent was approved to be associated with adverse cardiac events. Risk score derived by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) could identify high-risk group among patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) but its ability is still uncertain in the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM). The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the plaque burden shown by CCTA in diabetic patients with non-obstructive CAD.Methods and Results: 813 DM patients (age 58.9±9.9 years, 48.1% male) referred for CCTA due to suspect CAD in 2015-2017 were consecutively included. During a median follow-up of 31.77 months, 50 MACEs (6.15%) were experienced, including 2 cardiovascular deaths, 14 non-fatal myocardial infarction, 27 unstable angina requiring hospitalization and 7 strokes. 3 groups were defined based on coronary stenosis combined with Leidon score, as normal, non-obstructive Leidon<5, and non-obstructive Leidon≥5. Cox models was used to assess the prognosis of plaque burden within these groups. An incremental incidence of outcome event rates was observed. After adjustment for age, gender, and presence of high-risk plaque, the group of Leidon≥5 showed a higher risk than Leidon<5 in non-obstructive CAD (HR:1.88 95%CI:1.03-3.42, p=0.039). Similar results were illustrated when segment involvement score was used for sensitivity analysis.Conclusion: Atherosclerotic extent was associated with the prognosis of DM patients with non-obstructive coronary disease, highlighting the importance of better risk stratification and management.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Alnabelsi ◽  
A I Ahmed ◽  
Y Han ◽  
M Al Rifai ◽  
F Nabi ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CCTA)-derived measures of coronary artery disease (CAD) burden such as segment involvement score (SIS), which quantifies the number of segments with plaque, have been shown to independently predict incident cardiovascular events. Purpose We aimed to compare the added prognostic value of plaque burden to CCTA anatomic assessment and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) physiologic assessment in patients with diabetes undergoing both tests. Methods Consecutive patients with diabetes who underwent clinically indicated CCTA and SPECT myocardial imaging for suspected coronary artery disease at a tertiary care center were retrospectively identified from medical records. Stenosis severity and segment involvement score (SIS) were determined from CCTA, and presence of ischemia was determined from SPECT. Patients were followed from date of imaging for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; inclusive of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting 90-days after imaging test.) Results A total of 778 patients were included (mean age 60.6±14.4 years, 55% males). Obstructive stenosis (left main ≥50%, all other coronary segments ≥70%) and ischemia were found in 15% and 16% of patients respectively. After a median follow-up of 31 months, 87 (11%) patients experienced a MACE. In multivariable Cox regression models, SIS significantly predicted outcomes in models including obstructive stenosis and ischemia (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.10 - 1.24, p&lt;0.001; 1.16, 95% CI 1.10 - 1.23, p&lt;0.001). The addition of SIS also significantly improved discrimination (Harrel's C 0.75, p=0.006; 0.76, p=0.006 in models with CCTA obstructive stenosis and SPECT ischemia respectively). Results were consistent using subgroups of summed scores by composition of plaque (calcified vs non-calcified) and alternate definitions of obstructive stenosis. Conclusion Our results suggest that in high-risk patients with diabetes and suspected coronary disease, SIS has incremental prognostic value over ischemia by SPECT or stenosis by CCTA in predicting incident cardiovascular outcomes. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Theo Pezel ◽  
Guillaume Bonnet ◽  
Francesca Sanguineti ◽  
Marine Kinnel ◽  
Anouk Asselin ◽  
...  

Introduction: Non-invasive testing for ischemia to diagnose coronary artery disease(CAD) are frequently inconclusive(25%). Hypothesis: To assess the prognostic value of stress CMR in patients with a first inconclusive stress test. Methods: Between 2008 and 2018, consecutive patients with inconclusive stress test, defined by stress echocardiography or nuclear testing with uncertain conclusion, prospectively referred for stress CMR with dipyridamole were followed for major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE): cardiac death or myocardial infarction. An unsupervised clustering analysis was performed. Results: Of 1502 patients (62±12yrs, 59%men), 1397 completed the follow-up (median 5.5±2.3yrs). Three clusters were identified: Cluster 1 (n=524) had the highest prevalence of previous PCI, the highest presence of a myocardial scar defined, the lowest LVEF (35±7%) and the highest LV dilatation. Cluster 2 (n=406) had the highest previous CABG prevalence, preserved LVEF, absence of LV dilatation, and presence of myocardial scar. This cluster comprised predominantly male patients, with the highest rate of hypertension. Cluster 3 (n=572) had the lowest rate of previous PCI/CABG, the lowest rate of myocardial scar, predominantly female, the highest atrial fibrillation rate and body mass index. Survival analysis found significant differences across clusters for the occurrence of MACE (p=0.02). Inducible ischemia was associated with MACE occurrence in each cluster (C1, HR 2.28; 95%CI[1.31-3.99]; p=0.0028; C2, HR 3.37; 95%CI[1.97-5.75]; p<0.0001; C3, HR 2.73; 95%CI[1.67-4.46]; p<0.0001). In multivariable analysis, inducible ischemia predicted MACE in each cluster (p<0.001 for all). Conclusions: Cluster analysis identified 3 different phenotypes with distinct clinical and prognostic profiles. Within these clusters, stress CMR has an additional prognostic value to predict MACE..


Open Heart ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e001188
Author(s):  
Sothinathan Gurunathan ◽  
Mayooran Shanmuganathan ◽  
Reinette Hampson ◽  
Rajdeep Khattar ◽  
Roxy Senior

ObjectiveDue to the low prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in women, stress testing has a relatively low predictive value for this. Additionally, conventional cardiovascular risk scores underestimate risk in women. This study sought to evaluate the role of atherosclerosis assessment using carotid ultrasound (CU) in women attending for stress echocardiography (SE).MethodsThis was a prospective study in which consecutive women with recent-onset suspected angina, who were referred for clinically indicated SE, underwent CU.Results415 women (mean age 61±10 years, 29% diabetes mellitus, mean body mass index 28) attending for SE underwent CU. 47 women (11%) had inducible wall motion abnormalities, and carotid disease (CD) was present in 46% (carotid plaque in 41%, carotid intima-media thickness >75th percentile in 15%). Women with CD were older (65 vs 58 years, p<0.001), and more likely to have diabetes (41% vs 21%, p=0.001), hypertension (67% vs 36%, p<0.01) and a higher pretest probability of CAD (59% vs 41%, p<0.001). 40% of women classified as low Framingham risk were found to have evidence of CD.The positive predictive value of SE for flow-limiting CAD was 51%, but with the presence of carotid plaque, this was 71% (p<0.01). Carotid plaque (p=0.004) and ischaemia (p=0.01) were the only independent predictors of >70% angiographic stenosis. In women with ischaemia on SE and no carotid plaque, the negative predictive value for flow-limiting disease was 88%.During a follow-up of 1058±234 days, there were 15 events (defined as all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, heart failure admissions and late coronary revascularisation). Age (HR 1.07 (1.00–1.15), p=0.04), carotid plaque burden (HR 1.65 (1.36–2.00), p<0.001) and ischaemic burden (HR 1.41 (1.18–1.68), p<0.001) were associated with outcome. There was a stepwise increase in events/year from 0.3% when there were no ischaemia and atherosclerosis, 1.1% when there was atherosclerosis and no ischaemia, 2.2% when there was ischaemia and no atherosclerosis and 10% when there were both ischaemia and atherosclerosis (p<0.001).ConclusionCU significantly improves the accuracy of SE alone for identifying flow-limiting disease on coronary angiography, and improves risk stratification in women attending for SE, as well identifying a subset of women who may benefit from primary preventative measures.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zinuan Liu ◽  
Yipu Ding ◽  
Guanhua Dou ◽  
Xia Yang ◽  
Xi Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The prognostic value of non-obstructive CAD has always been underestimated due to its moderate stenosis. Whether the atherosclerotic extent is related to the prognosis in this group of people is uncertain, especially in the presence of diabetes. We aim to investigate the prognostic value of atherosclerotic extent in diabetic patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).Method: The analysis was based on a single center cohort of diabetic patients referred for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) due to suspect CAD. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were recorded, including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke and unstable angina (UA) requiring hospitalization. Four groups were defined based on coronary stenosis combined with segment involvement score (SIS), a semiquantitative index of the extent of atherosclerosis, including normal, non-obstructive SIS<3, non-obstructive SIS≥3 and obstructive. Time to event was estimated by using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Leidon risk score was used to replace SIS for sensitivity analysis.Results: In total, 1241 patients were included (age 60.2±10.4 years, 54.1% male), experiencing 131 MACEs (10.6%) during a median follow-up of 2.6 years. Diabetic patients with non-obstructive CAD accounts for 50.2% of included population(N=623). In multi-variate Cox model adjusting for age, gender, hyperlipidemia and presence of high-risk plaque, hazard ratio (HR) for SIS < 3 and SIS ≥ 3 in non-obstructive CAD were 1.84 (95%CI: 0.70-4.79) and 3.71 (95%CI: 1.37-10.00) respectively.The latter showed a higher risk of cardiac adverse events than the former group(HR:2.02 95%CI:1.11-3.68, p=0.021), while HR for obstructive CAD was 5.46 (95%CI: 2.18-13.69). Sensitivity analysis was performed using Leidon Risk Score instead of SIS. After adjustment, HR for Leidon ≥ 5 with non-obstructive disease was 1.92(95% CI: 1.06-3.48 p=0.032)in comparison to the non-obstructive group of Leidon < 5.Conclusion: In diabetic patients with non-obstructive CAD, atherosclerotic extent was associated with higher risk of major adverse cardiac events at long-term follow-up. Efforts should be made to determine risk stratification for the management of DM patients with non-obstructive CAD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
MostafaAttia Eldegwi ◽  
WaleedAbdou Ibrahim ◽  
IbrahimShehata Elmadbouh ◽  
AhmedAbdullah Mostafa ◽  
AbdullahMostafa Kamal

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document