scholarly journals Perineural Invasion Should Be Regarded as an Intermediate-Risk Factor for Recurrence in Surgically Treated Cervical Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Ting Wan ◽  
Hua Tu ◽  
Lili Liu ◽  
He Huang ◽  
Yanling Feng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Perineural Invasion ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
High Risk Factors

Background. Perineural invasion (PNI) is considered as a poor prognostic factor in cervical cancer, but there has been no postoperative adjuvant therapy for it, because whether it belongs to high- or intermediate-risk factors has not been determined, this study intends to provide evidences to solve this problem. Methods. We conducted a retrospective analysis of cervical cancer patients who underwent radical surgery and be reported PNI from January 2012 to June 2017 at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. After 1 : 1 propensity score matching (PSM), a group of patients without PNI was matched according to the clinical pathological features. Postoperative pathological parameters and prognosis were evaluated between the PNI and the matched groups. Results. 1836 patients were screened, of which 162 (8.8%) diagnosed as stages IB1 to IIB reported PNI. Comparing to the matched group, more PNI (+) patients had deep outer cervix stromal invasion, cervical tunica adventitia invasion, positive lymph nodes, and positive margins. Among patients without high-risk factors, PNI (+) patients had worse 3-year overall survival (90.8% vs. 98.1%, P = 0.02 ), PNI (+) patients with single intermediate-risk factor and PNI (-) patients who meet with SEDLIS criteria had similar progress free survival ( P = 0.63 ) and overall survival ( P = 0.63 ), even similar survival curves. Conclusion. PNI is related to a worse overall survival among cervical cancer patients without high-risk factors and play the role as an intermediate-risk factor.

Efficacy and toxicity of postoperative external beam radiotherapy or chemoradiation for early-stage cervical cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 1878-1886
Author(s):  
Mick J E van den Akker ◽  
Nanda Horeweg ◽  
Jogchum Jan Beltman ◽  
Carien L Creutzberg ◽  
Remi A Nout
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
High Risk Factors ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors For Recurrence

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the impact of the evolving role of the addition of chemotherapy to postoperative radiotherapy on oncological outcomes and toxicity in patients with early-stage cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy.MethodsRetrospective cohort study of patients with stage IB1–IIB FIGO 2009 cervical cancer treated from November 1999 to May 2015 by primary surgery and radiotherapy (46–50.4 Gy in 1.8–2.0 Gy fractions) with or without concurrent cisplatin (40 mg/m2, 5–6 weekly cycles) with or without a brachytherapy boost. Chemotherapy was allocated depending on the risk factors for recurrence. Incidences of all outcomes were calculated using Kaplan–Meier’s methodology and compared by log-rank tests. Risk factors for recurrence and survival were identified using Cox’s proportional hazards models.ResultsA total of 154 patients were included, median follow-up was 9.6 years (IQR: 6.1–12.8). Five-year pelvic recurrence-free survival was 75.3%; 74.7% in patients with high-risk factors treated with radiotherapy; and 77.3% in those treated with chemoradiation (P=0.43). Distant metastasis-free survival at 5 years was 63.4%; 63.6% in high-risk patients after radiotherapy; and 57.1% after chemoradiation (P=0.36). Five-year overall survival was 63.9%: 66.8% and 51.6% after radiotherapy and after chemoradiation in patients with high-risk factors (P=0.37), respectively. Large tumor size was a risk factor for vaginal and pelvic recurrence, ≥2 involved lymph nodes was a significant risk factor for para-aortic recurrence and death. Mild treatment-related late toxicity was observed in 53.9% of the patients. Five-year severe (grade 3–5) late rectal, bladder, bowel, and vaginal toxicities were, respectively, 1.3%, 0%, 3.4%, and 0.9%. Any late severe toxicity was observed in 5.5% of patients treated with radiotherapy and in 15.3% of those treated with chemoradiation (P=0.07).ConclusionPostoperative (chemo)radiation for early-stage cervical cancer patients with risk factors for recurrence yields adequate pelvic tumor control, but overall survival is limited due to distant metastasis.

Pre-Transplant Variables Affecting the Outcome of Submyeloablative Allogeneic HSCT in Uniformly Treated Patients with Hematologic Malignancies.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2324-2324
Author(s):  
Jayesh Mehta ◽  
S. Singhal ◽  
M. Tallman ◽  
S. Williams ◽  
J. Winter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
Allogeneic Hsct ◽  
High Risk Factors

Abstract The outcome of 63 consecutive submyeloablative allografts (27–66 y, median 52) performed for hematologic malignancies after 100 mg/m2 melphalan without (n=21; prior autograft) or with (n=42; no prior autograft) 50 mg/kg cyclophosphamide was analyzed to study the effect of pre-transplant characteristics. GVHD prophylaxis comprised cyclosporine-mycophenolate (n=37; HLA-identical sibling donors) or tacrolimus-mycophenolate (n=26, 1-locus mismatched sibling or 9–10/10 allele-matched unrelated). No growth factors were administered routinely post-transplant and supportive care was uniform. 14 patients experienced transplant-related mortality (TRM), and 32 relapsed. 24 relapsing patients died, and 7 of the other 8 are alive in CR or with declining disease. The following factors were analyzed in a Cox model for their effect on TRM and relapse: chemosensitive (n=25) vs refractory disease (n=38), age ≤55 (n=44) vs >55 (n=19), normal (n=32) vs abnormal (n=31) LDH, HLA match (n=56) vs mismatch (n=7), prior autograft or not, performance status 0–1 (n=47) vs 2–3 (n=16). Outcome Favorable factor RR (95% CI) P TRM Age ≤55 0.20 (0.04–0.86) 0.03 HLA matched 0.21 (0.05–0.89) 0.04 Performance status 0-1 0.25 (0.06–0.99) 0.05 Relape Chemosensitive disease 0.28 (0.11–0.73) 0.01 Fig 1 shows TRM for patients with 0, 1 or 2 high-risk factors for TRM. Fig 1 shows TRM for patients with 0, 1 or 2 high-risk factors for TRM. Fig 2 shows overall survival (OS) for patients with 0 or 1 high-risk factors for TRM by disease chemosensitivity. Fig 2 shows overall survival (OS) for patients with 0 or 1 high-risk factors for TRM by disease chemosensitivity. Table 2 shows the causes of death by risk factors for TRM and disease chemosensitivity. Group (n) Alive TRM Death from disease A: 2 risk factors for TRM (7) 1 (14%) 5 (71%) 1 (14%) B: 1 risk factor for TRM + Refractory (19) 2 (11%) 6 (32%) 11 (58%) C: 1 risk factor for TRM + Sensitive (9) 5 (56%) 1 (11%) 3 (33%) D: 0 risk factor for TRM + Refractory (12) 3 (25%) 1 (8%) 8 (67%) E: 0 risk factor for TRM + Sensitive (16) 13 (81%) 1 (6%) 2 (13%) These data suggest that while the current treatment approach is optimal for patients falling in Group E, modified approaches are needed for other patients. Based on the causes of failure, the following modifications appear to be warranted. Group A: A completely non-ablative regimen to reduce toxicity. Group B: A completely non-ablative regimen to reduce toxicity with augmentation of graft-vs-tumor effects by elective donor leukocyte infusions and/or abbreviated immunosuppression. Group C: Augmentation of graft-vs-tumor effects by elective donor leukocyte infusions and/or abbreviated immunosuppression. Group D: Conventional-intensity rather than reduced-intensity allogeneic HSCT.

scholarly journals Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy in invasive cervical cancer patients with high risk factors

2000 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tchan Kyu Park ◽  
Soo Nyung Kim ◽  
Sang Wun Kim ◽  
Gwi Eon Kim ◽  
Chang Ok Suh
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Invasive Cervical Cancer ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
High Risk Factors
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document