scholarly journals Effects of Oral Vitamin B1 and Mecobalamin on Dry Eye Disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Xiaotong Ren ◽  
Yilin Chou ◽  
Xiaodan Jiang ◽  
Ran Hao ◽  
Yuexin Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Foreign Body ◽  
Dry Eye ◽  
Vitamin B1 ◽  
Foreign Body Sensation ◽  
Eye Drops ◽  
Artificial Tears ◽  
Oral Vitamin ◽  
Body Sensation ◽  
Group 3

Purpose. To assess the effects of oral vitamin B1 and mecobalamin on dry eye disease (DED) and patient satisfaction with treatment. Methods. In this randomized controlled study, DED patients were divided into 4 groups based on treatment: group 1, only artificial tears; group 2, corticosteroid eye drops and artificial tears; group 3, oral vitamin B1, mecobalamin, and artificial tears; and group 4, oral vitamin B1, mecobalamin, corticosteroid eye drops, and artificial tears. DED symptoms, signs, and patient satisfaction with treatment were assessed at baseline and at 1 and 2 months after treatment. Results. In total, 152 eyes from 76 patients (age, 55.25 ± 18.16 years) were included. In group 3, there were significant differences in dryness, foreign body sensation, burning, and tear film breakup time first (TBUTF) between 1 and 2 months after treatment and in satisfaction scores before and after treatment (P<0.05). In group 3, there were also significant differences in dryness, foreign body sensation, photophobia, and TBUTA and between baseline and 2 months after treatment (P<0.05). There was a significant difference in foreign body sensation between 1 and 2 months after treatment in groups 3 and 4 (P<0.05). Furthermore, we also find obvious improvement in corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD) between baseline and 1 and 2 months after treatment in groups 3 and 4 (P<0.05). Conclusions. Oral vitamin B1 and mecobalamin can relieve some dry eye symptoms such as dryness, pain, and photophobia and improve DED signs and patient satisfaction. Thus, vitamin B1 and mecobalamin are potential treatment options for patients with DED.

scholarly journals Topical Anesthetic Misuse in Patients Admitted to Sabzevar Eye Clinic in Iran

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 287-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ebrahim Shirzadeh ◽  
Nematullah Shomoossi ◽  
Hasan Abdolahzadeh
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Body ◽  
Foreign Bodies ◽  
Foreign Body Sensation ◽  
Eye Drops ◽  
Ocular Pain ◽  
Topical Anesthetic ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Common Location ◽  
Body Sensation ◽  
Eye Clinic

Abstract Topical anesthetic eye drops are used extensively for ophthalmic examinations but self-treatment and non-technical removal of foreign bodies using tetracaine drops can be hazardous. The present study intended to determine the inadmissible uses of anesthetic tetracaine eye drops, manner of drug obtaining and likelihood of the ocular complications in the patients. This cross-sectional study was conducted on 162 patients with ocular pain and foreign body sensation, red eye or lid edema admitted to the Eye clinic in Sabzevar, Iran. Variables included age, sex, chief compliant, job, site of foreign bodies, diagnosis of problem, use of tetracaine drops, drug provision, times patients referred to the eye clinic, and kinds of treatment. The most common chief complaint for admission to the Eye clinic was lacrimation (55.6%), followed by ocular pain, and foreign body sensation (35.8%). Some patients (30.9%) (mostly welders) inadmissibly used topical tetracaine eye drops; 21.6% of cases obtained tetracaine eye drops from drugstores without doctor’s prescription, and only 3.7% provided drugs by prescription. Corneal site (81.5%) was the most common location of foreign body; metallic foreign body (63%) was the most common. One patient was admitted in hospital for management. Topical inadmissible tetracaine (0.5%) is commonly used by welders, who obtain it from drugstores without prescriptions due to its simple usage and short acting pain relief. Supervision is required over drugstores for denying it if demanded without a prescription. Enhancing clients’ awareness is also suggested.

scholarly journals Recurrent keratoconjunctivitis as the sole manifestation of COVID-19 infection: A case report

2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212110065
Author(s):  
Satria Audi Hutama ◽  
Firas Farisi Alkaff ◽  
Ryan Enast Intan ◽  
Citra Dewi Maharani ◽  
Luki Indriaswati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Foreign Body ◽  
Foreign Body Sensation ◽  
Polymerase Chain Reaction Test ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽  
Conjunctival Hyperemia ◽  
Blurred Vision ◽  
Ocular Symptoms ◽  
Body Sensation ◽  
Fluorescence Test

Introduction: Ocular symptoms are uncommon manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Earlier study reported that dry eye, blurred vision, foreign body sensation, tearing, itching, conjunctival secretion, conjunctival congestion, ocular pain, and photophobia are among the ocular symptoms that could be found in COVID-19 patients. However, there are only a few reports available regarding corneal involvement in this disease. Here we report a case of keratoconjunctivitis as the only symptom of COVID-19 infection. Case description: A 27-year-old man who worked as an obstetrics and gynecology resident came to the outpatient clinic with the chief complaints of eye discomfort, foreign body sensation, conjunctival hyperemia, lacrimation, and photophobia in his right eye for the past 3 weeks. Fluorescence test showed a small corneal lesion. The patient was then diagnosed with keratoconjunctivitis. A week after the treatment, all symptoms were resolved. A month later, the patient came to the emergency room with the same eye complaints but with a more severe pain. The fluorescence test showed wider corneal lesion compared to last month. The result from the corneal swab is negative for bacterial or fungal infection, indicating a viral infection. Afterwards, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction test from nasopharyngeal swab was performed and revealed that the patient was positive for COVID-19. Conclusions: This case report showed that keratoconjunctivitis may occur as the only manifestation of COVID-19 infection. Thus, patient presented with unexplainable eye symptoms should be evaluated for COVID-19 infection.

scholarly journals Auscultating a pea: the stethoscope may matter in otorhinolaryngology emergency evaluation

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 530
Author(s):  
Francisco Alves De Sousa ◽  
Ana Costa Silva ◽  
Ana Nóbrega Pinto ◽  
Cecília Almeida E. Sousa
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Body ◽  
Lower Lobe ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Foreign Body Sensation ◽  
Careful Examination ◽  
Lower Airway ◽  
Lobe Bronchus ◽  
Body Sensation ◽  
The Right

<p>Foreign body sensation is a common complaint in the otorhinolaryngology emergency. Careful examination of the patient’s pharynx is mandatory, but sometimes the object is not visualized. In such scenario, it may be important to explore signs and symptoms indicating lower aerodigestive impaction. This work describes the case of a 73-year-old woman without relevant comorbidities attending to emergency care. She complained of a foreign body sensation on the right side of the throat after ingesting a meal, which motivated referral to otorhinolaryngology. Flexible transnasal nasopharyngoscopy was unremarkable and no foreign bodies were found. Auscultation was performed revealing low-pitch expiratory wheezing on her right hemithorax. The suspicion of bronchial foreign body was then raised, which was ultimately confirmed by imaging and bronchoscopy, showing an impacted pea on the right lower lobe bronchus. The stethoscope was hence determinant for detecting aspiration, by revealing consistent alterations. Its usage should be encouraged in similar scenarios, highlighting the role of this classic but sometimes forgotten tool. Importantly, higher neck/throat sensations should not exclude the possibility of a lower airway foreign body.</p>

A STUDY OF COMPARISON OF PURE TISSUE REPAIR (DESERDA) AND PROSTHETIC REPAIR (LICHTENSTEIN) METHODS FOR INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR-A COMPARATIVE STUDY

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Harish Chauhan ◽  
Daxesh Patel ◽  
Nishan Gaudani
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Foreign Body ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Late Complication ◽  
Normal Activity ◽  
Foreign Body Sensation ◽  
Prosthetic Repair ◽  
Body Sensation

INTRODUCTION: An ideal hernia repair should be tension free, tissue based, with no potential damage to vital structures, no long term pain or complications and no recurrence. Although Lichtenstein's prosthetic repair is simple and safe, but it is also correlated with risk of infections, recurrence, chronic pain, testicular atrophy and infertility, foreign body sensations and chronic groin sepsis. Desarda hernia repair does not require mesh and provide more physiological support. It is simple, easy to learn. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: a) To compare the operative time, postoperative stay and time required to return normal activity between two groups. b) To compare early complication rate and late complication rate between two groups. MATERIALAND METHODS: This observational study was conducted among patients admitted with the diagnosis of primary inguinal hernia in SMIMER, Surat. The patients were randomly allocated to either Lichtenstein or Desarda method of hernia repair. Operating time, post operative stay and duration of return to normal activity were recorded. Early complications were noted and the patients were followed up to 12 months for late complications (chronic pain, foreign body sensation, and recurrence). RESULTS: The mean operative time and postoperative stay did not show signicant differ for both groups. Patients operated by Desarda technique returned to normal activity signicantly early by 12.2 ± 2.54 days as compared to patients operated by Lichtenstein techniques (14.0 ± 2.76 days, p = 0.01). Most common early complication in both groups was pain (D group; 40.0%, Lgroup: 45.2%) followed by wound infection (D group; 8.0%, Lgroup: 6.5%) and seroma (D group; 0.0%, Lgroup: 3.2%). Occurrence of chronic pain was more in Lgroup (58.1%) as compared to D group (16.0%, p=0.001). None of the patients from D group had foreign body sensation. Foreign body sensation was observed only in ve patients of Lgroup (16.1%). Recurrence rate during one year in Lgroup (6.5%) was higher than D group (4.0%). CONCLUSION: Early return to work was potential benet of Desarda repair. Early complications were similar in both procedures. Desarda repair has lower incidence of chronic pain and foreign body sensation. However, there is no signicant difference for chronic pain in Desarda group when compared in same patients operated bilaterally with different technique. This study was conducted with small sample size with short follow up. Therefore, result of late complication in the present study may insufcient to conclude the probability of occurrence as longer follow up and larger sample size is required.

An unusual cause of long-standing foreign body sensation in throat

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
SantoshKumar Swain ◽  
Biplob Bhattacharyya ◽  
MaheshChandra Sahu
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Body ◽  
Foreign Body Sensation ◽  
Body Sensation

A Clinical Investigation of the Efficacy of a PPI (Proton Pump Inhibitor) for Foreign Body Sensation in the Throat

2010 ◽  
Vol 126 ◽  
pp. 30-32
Author(s):  
Chieri Hayashi ◽  
Hidenori Yokoi ◽  
Yukiko Ichihari ◽  
Naoko Yokoi ◽  
Takashi Iizuka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Body ◽  
Proton Pump Inhibitor ◽  
Proton Pump ◽  
Clinical Investigation ◽  
Foreign Body Sensation ◽  
Body Sensation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document