scholarly journals Identification of Risk Factors Associated with Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis for Sentinel Lymph Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Zhen He ◽  
Xiaowen Lan ◽  
Yuting Tan ◽  
Xiao Lin ◽  
Ge Wen ◽  
...  

Objective. This study aimed to identify clinicopathological factors related to the extent of axillary lymph node (ALN) involvement in early-stage BC patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). Methods. This was a retrospective analysis of 566 patients in cT1-2N0M0 with 1-2 positive SLNs that underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) at Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital. The clinical and pathologic data from these patients were analyzed. Results. Of these 566 patients, 235 (41.5%) exhibited NSLN metastases. Multivariate analysis revealed that the number of positive SLNs (odds ratio (OR) = 1.511; P = 0.038 ), the ratio of metastatic/dissected SLNs (SLN metastasis rate) (OR = 2.124; P < 0.001 ), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (OR = 1.503; P = 0.022 ) were all independent predictors of NSLN metastasis. Patients with 0, 1, 2, or 3 of these risk factors exhibited NSLN metastases in 29.3%, 35.7%, 50.8%, and 68.3% of cases, respectively. We additionally found that the number of positive SLNs (OR = 3.582; P < 0.001 ), SLN metastasis rate (OR = 2.505; P = 0.001 ), LVI (OR = 2.010; P = 0.004 ), and HER2 overexpression (OR = 1.774; P = 0.034 ) were all independent predictors of N2 disease. When individuals had 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 of these risk factors, they had four or more involved ALNs in 5.2%, 10.8%, 21.1%, 37.5%, and 70.6% of cases, respectively. Conclusion. These results suggest that the number of positive SLNs, the SLN metastasis rate, and LVI are all significant predictors of ALN status in BC patients that have 1-2 positive SLNs and that have undergone ALND. In addition, HER2 overexpression was a significant predictor of N2 disease.

Breast Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 284-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiteru Akezaki ◽  
Eiji Nakata ◽  
Masato Kikuuchi ◽  
Ritsuko Tominaga ◽  
Hideaki Kurokawa ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 3527-3533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Pilewskie ◽  
Emily C. Zabor ◽  
Anita Mamtani ◽  
Andrea V. Barrio ◽  
Michelle Stempel ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Zhong ◽  
Yali Xu ◽  
Yidong Zhou ◽  
Feng Mao ◽  
Yan Lin ◽  
...  

Abstract To verify whether omitting radiotherapy from breast cancer treatment for patients ≥ 70 years old following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) without axillary lymph node dissection is safe. Previous studies have shown that omitting breast radiotherapy after BCS and axillary lymph node dissection is safe for elderly breast cancer patients. We aimed to evaluate the safety of BCS without axillary surgery or breast radiotherapy (BCSNR) in elderly patients with breast cancer and clinically negative axillary lymph nodes. We performed a retrospective analysis of 481 patients with breast cancer, aged ≥ 70 years, between 2010 and 2016. Of these, 302 patients underwent BCSNR and 179 underwent other, larger scope operations. Local recurrence rate, ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) rate, distant metastasis rate, breast-related death, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. After a median follow-up of 60 months, no significant differences in local recurrence, distant metastasis rate, breast-related death, and DFS were noted. The OS was similar (P = 0.56) between the BCSNR group (91.7%) and other operations group (93.0%). The IBTR rate was considered low in both groups, however resulted greater (P = 0.005) in the BCSNR group (5.3%) than in other operations group (1.6%). BCSNR did not affect the survival of elderly patients with breast cancer with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes. IBTR was infrequent in both groups; however, there was a significant difference between the two groups. BCSNR is a feasible treatment modality for patients with breast cancer ≥ 70 years old with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. 213s-213s
Author(s):  
M. Owusu Sekyere

Background: All breast cancer patients are at risk for developing lymphedema (LE) as a complication of breast cancer surgery and radiation. The reported incidence ranges from 5%-60%. In Ghana, 50% of women with breast cancer who come to the hospital present with late-stage breast cancer. Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH) has no available data to support LE incidence. Aim: To determine the incidence and risk factors of lymphedema after breast cancer treatment at the oncology unit of KATH, Kumasi, Ghana between 01 January 2005 to 31 December 2008. Methods: Breast cancer and lymphedema related variables were collected from the medical records of breast cancer patients. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and χ2 tests. Results: Among 313 patients treated for breast cancer between 2005 and 2008, 31 (9.9%) developed lymphedema after treatment. A χ2 test showed that axillary lymph node dissection was statistically a significant risk factor of lymphedema (χ2 test value = 7.055, P = 0.008). Radiation and late stage of breast cancer diagnosis may have contributed in development of lymphedema despite having P value > 0.05. Age, BMI and hypertension were also not associated with lymphedema. Conclusion: This study provides evidence that the incidence of lymphedema was 9.9% with axillary lymph node dissection as a statistically significant risk factor of lymphedema. Implication for practice: With majority of breast cancer patients presenting with late stage disease and also undergoing axillary lymph node dissection, lymphedema will continue to be a problem in Ghana. Knowing the incidence and risk factors of lymphedema not only helps in the early detection and effective management of lymphedema but also provides base-line data for further research on lymphedema in Ghana.


Breast Care ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Bargehr ◽  
Michael Edlinger ◽  
Michael Hubalek ◽  
Christian Marth ◽  
Roland Reitsamer

Breast Cancer ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 657-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reiko Kobayashi ◽  
Kenshiro Shiraishi ◽  
Satoru Iwase ◽  
Kuni Ohtomo ◽  
Keiichi Nakagawa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document