scholarly journals High-Dose Toremifene as a Promising Candidate Therapy for Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer with Secondary Resistance to Aromatase Inhibitors

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Atsushi Fushimi ◽  
Isao Tabei ◽  
Azusa Fuke ◽  
Tomoyoshi Okamoto ◽  
Hiroshi Takeyama
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastasis ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Postmenopausal Breast Cancer ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Secondary Resistance ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive

There are currently no established second- and later-line therapies for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer. We examined the efficacy of high-dose toremifene (HD-TOR) for this patient group and whether aromatase inhibitor (AI) resistance influences HD-TOR treatment outcome. This retrospective analysis investigated the outcomes of 19 women with postmenopausal hormone-sensitive recurrent or metastatic breast cancer who received HD-TOR, defined as 120 mg daily from 2012 to 2016. The median follow-up duration was 9.67 months. The overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) were compared between various clinical subgroups, including patients exhibiting primary or secondary AI resistance as defined by the timing of recurrence or progression. Time to treatment failure (TTF) was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared between subgroups by the log-rank test. The overall ORR was 21.1%, and the CBR was 31.6%. CBR was significantly higher for patients without liver metastasis (50% vs. 0%, p=0.044). Nine cases exhibited primary and eight cases secondary AI resistance. Both ORR and CBR were higher in patients with secondary AI resistance (25% vs. 0%, p=0.087; 38% vs. 11%, p=0.29). The median TTF was 6.2 months in the entire AI-resistant group (n=17) and was longer in the secondary resistance subgroup than in the primary resistance subgroup (8.40 vs. 4.87 months; log-rank: p=0.159). High-dose TOR appears to be most effective for postmenopausal breast cancer cases with secondary resistance to AIs, cases without prior AI treatment, and cases without liver metastasis. The detailed mechanisms of AI resistance and the clinical features of responsive cases need to be further clarified to identify the best candidates for HD-TOR.

scholarly journals Patterns of treatment and outcome with 500-mg fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a real-life multicenter Italian experience

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 175883591983386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaella Palumbo ◽  
Federico Sottotetti ◽  
Erica Quaquarini ◽  
Anna Gambaro ◽  
Antonella Ferzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastasis ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Large Population ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive

Background: Fulvestrant 500 mg (F500) is the most active endocrine single agent in hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Few data are available regarding the effectiveness of the drug in a real-world setting. Patients and methods: This prospective, multicenter cohort study aimed to describe the patterns of treatment and performance of F500 in a large population of unselected women with MBC, focusing on potential prognostic or predictive factors for disease outcome and response. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and clinical benefit rate. Results: From January 2011 to December 2015, 490 consecutive patients treated with F500 were enrolled. Overall, three different cohorts were identified and analyzed: the first received F500 after progression from previous chemotherapy (CT) or endocrine therapy; the second received the drug for de novo metastatic disease; and the third was treated as maintenance following disease stabilization or a response from a previous CT line. Median overall survival (OS) in the whole population was 26.8 months, ranging from 32.4 in first line to 22.0 and 13.7 months in second line and subsequent lines, respectively. Both the presence of liver metastasis and the treatment line were significantly associated with a worse PFS, while only the presence of liver metastasis maintained its predictive role for OS in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: The effectiveness of F500 was detected in patients treated both upon disease progression and as maintenance. The relevant endocrine sensitivity of 80% of patients included in the study could probably explain the good results observed in terms of outcome.

Phase II randomized trial of toremifene 120 mg compared with exemestane 25 mg after prior nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 105-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirotaka Iwase ◽  
Yutaka Yamamoto ◽  
Takashi Ishikawa ◽  
Yasuo Hozumi ◽  
Masahiko Ikeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Postmenopausal Breast Cancer ◽  
Comparative Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive

105 Background: The non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (nsAIs) have been mainly employed as adjuvant therapy or as early recurrent treatment for postmenopausal breast cancer with hormone receptor-positive tumor. When its treatment fails, it is unclear which endocrine therapy including selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), steroidal AI (sAI), or fulvestrant is the most appropriate. Methods: Open labeled multicenter randomized comparative trial of high-dose toremifene for nsAI resistant breast cancer compared to exmestane (Hi-FAIR ex; registry number UMIN000001841) was performed from Nov 2008 to Oct 2011. Toremifene 120 mg (TOR120) or exemestane 25mg (EXE) was administered once daily. The primary end point was clinical benefit rate (CBR). The secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Results: A total of 91 women were randomly assigned to TOR120 (n=46) or EXE (n=45). Two of 46 cases allocated for TOR120 refused this trial before the administration. There was no difference of patients’ characteristics between both groups. In the analysis as of median 16.9 months for an observation period, TOR120 were superior to EXE in CBR (47.5% vs. 26.7%; p=0.046) and in PFS (Hazard ratio; 0.62, 95% CI; 0.38-0.99, p=0.047). There was, however, no statistical differences in ORR (11.6% vs. 2.2%; p=0.065) and in OS (hazard ratio; 0.57, 95% CI; 0.24-1.34, p=0.19). Both treatments were well-tolerated, with no severe adverse events, although 3 of 44 women treated by TOR120 were stopped in a couple of weeks because of nausea and general fatigue which were thought to be early endocrine-related symptoms. Conclusions: Our data suggested that toremifene 120mg, as a following therapy for postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer who have failed non-steroidal AI treatment, could be potentially useful than steroidal AI.

Change in circulating endothelial cells (CEC) predicts progression free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) receiving letrozole (L) and bevacizumab (B)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3039-3039 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. S. Rugo ◽  
M. N. Dickler ◽  
T. A. Traina ◽  
J. H. Scott ◽  
D. H. Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Antiangiogenic Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Circulating Endothelial Cells ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Nucleic Acid Content ◽  
Activation Markers ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive

3039 Background: Antiangiogenic therapy has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment (tx) of metastatic breast cancer. Mechanism-based biomarkers of antiangiogenic therapy, if clinically validated, offer the potential to optimize this novel therapy. CECs have been proposed as a marker of tumor progression and/or response to antiangiogenic therapy with B. We performed a feasibility study testing B combined with L for the tx of hormone receptor-positive MBC. To explore markers of activity and response, we assayed CECs and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) at weeks (wks) 0 (baseline), 3, 12, and then Q 12 wks. Methods: CECs were defined as CD34/31+, CD45-. Progenitor (CD133+) (CECp) and activation markers (CD106+) were also measured. For CECs, 50 ul of blood was stained with the indicated MAbs; after RBC lysis, flow cytometry (FC) was performed for total CEC and CECp. For CTCs, 20 ml of blood was subjected to immunomagnetic capture using anti-EpCAM ferrofluid, followed by FC for EpCAM, CD45, and nucleic acid content. The log rank test was used to test for significant differences related to response. Results: 32 of 42 pts have been enrolled. As separately reported, prior non-steroidal AI (NSAI) use without progression is permitted; median (med) time on L before start of B was 6 mo (1–52). 28 pts have at least baseline and week 3 CEC and CTC along with clinical response data. Med CEC level at baseline was 10.4 CEC/ul (4–38); the peak value at any time point was 107. CTC levels were much less frequent with a med of 0.3 CTC/ml (0–95, and highest value 1153). An increase in CECs at wk 3 compared to wk 0 predicted worse PFS (p = 0.015). CTCs were ≤ 0.1 at study start in 40% of pts and ≥ 1.0 in only 17%, likely due to length of prior L; change in values at wk 3 did not correlate with PFS in this pretreated group. Conclusions: Consistent with our previous results in a separate trial of B containing treatment in MBC, changes in CEC levels appear to be a biomarker of response/progression on antiangiogenic therapy. CTCs did not reflect response or progression in this population of patients, likely due to lengthy prior exposure to letrozole. Supported in part by Genentech and Novartis. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Patterns of treatment and outcome of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive/HER2 receptor-negative metastatic breast cancer: a real-world multicentre Italian study

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175883592098765
Author(s):  
Raffaella Palumbo ◽  
Rosalba Torrisi ◽  
Federico Sottotetti ◽  
Daniele Presti ◽  
Anna Rita Gambaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Real World ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Her2 Receptor ◽  
Treatment Line ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive

Background: The CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib combined with endocrine therapy (ET) has proven to prolong progression-free survival (PFS) in women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Few data are available regarding the efficacy of such a regimen outside the clinical trials. Patients and methods: This is a multicentre prospective real-world experience aimed at verifying the outcome of palbociclib plus ET in an unselected population of MBC patients. The primary aim was the clinical benefit rate (CBR); secondary aims were the median PFS, overall survival (OS) and safety. Patients received palbociclib plus letrozole 2.5 mg (cohort A) or fulvestrant 500 mg (cohort B). Results: In total, 191 patients (92 in cohort A, 99 in cohort B) were enrolled and treated, and 182 were evaluable for the analysis. Median age was 62 years (range 47–79); 54% had visceral involvement; 28% of patients had previously performed one treatment line (including chemotherapy and ET), 22.6% two lines and 15.9% three. An overall response rate of 34.6% was observed with 11 (6.0%) complete responses and 52 (28.6%) partial responses. Stable disease was achieved by 78 patients (42.9%) with an overall CBR of 59.8%. At a median follow-up of 24 months (range 6–32), median PFS was 13 months without significant differences between the cohorts. When analysed according to treatment line, PFS values were significantly prolonged when palbociclib-based therapy was administered as first-line treatment (14.0 months), to decrease progressively in second and subsequent lines (11.7 and 6.7 months, respectively). Median OS was 25 months, ranging from 28.0 months in 1st line to 18.0 and 13.0 months in 2nd and subsequent lines, respectively. Conclusions: Our data indicate that palbociclib plus ET is active and safe in HR+/HER2− MBC, also suggesting a better performance of the combinations in earlier treatment lines.

scholarly journals Olaparib in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer with a somatic BRCA2 mutation

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175883592110069
Author(s):  
Lee S. Schwartzberg ◽  
Lesli A. Kiedrowski
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Brca2 Mutation ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Susceptibility Gene ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Breast Cancer Susceptibility Gene ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive

The oral poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib is approved for the treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and a germline breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutation who have been treated with chemotherapy. This case report describes a 63-year-old postmenopausal woman with somatic BRCA2-mutated mBC who responded to olaparib treatment following multiple prior lines of therapy. The patient presented in January 2012 with locally advanced, hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2− BC which, despite initial response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, recurred as bone disease in February 2014, and subsequently skin (June 2016) and liver (October 2016) metastases. A comprehensive 592-gene next-generation sequencing panel (Caris Life Sciences), performed on a skin biopsy, detected a pathogenic frameshift mutation in BRCA2 (H3154fs, c.9460delC), which was not identified in a 28-gene hereditary cancer germline analysis (Myriad Genetics, Inc.), and was therefore considered to be a somatic mutation. In January 2017, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis (Guardant Health, Inc.) confirmed the BRCA2 H3154fs mutation in plasma. After several lines of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, deriving clinical benefit from eribulin and capecitabine, the disease progressed by October 2017, and olaparib (300 mg orally twice daily) was initiated in January 2018. By April 2018, the liver lesions had shrunk by 80% and a >90% response in multiple skin lesions was noted. Clinical response was maintained for 8 months, followed by progression in the skin in September 2018. Biopsy of recurrent lesions revealed a novel BRCA2 mutation, E3152del (c.9455_9457delAGG), predicted to restore the open reading frame and presumably the mechanism of resistance to olaparib. Further likely resistance mutations were noted in subsequent cfDNA analyses. This case demonstrated a clinical response with olaparib as a later-line therapy for HR+, HER2− mBC with a somatic BRCA2 mutation.

Phase II Trial of Anastrozole Plus Goserelin in the Treatment of Hormone Receptor–Positive, Metastatic Carcinoma of the Breast in Premenopausal Women

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (25) ◽  
pp. 3917-3921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert. W. Carlson ◽  
Richard Theriault ◽  
Christine M. Schurman ◽  
Edgardo Rivera ◽  
Cathie T. Chung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Hot Flashes ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive

Purpose To explore the antitumor activity of the aromatase inhibitor, anastrozole, in the treatment of premenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive, metastatic breast cancer who have been rendered functionally postmenopausal with the use of the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist, goserelin. Patients and Methods Premenopausal women with estrogen and/or progesterone receptor–positive, metastatic or recurrent breast cancer were enrolled in this prospective, single-arm, multicenter phase II trial. Patients were treated with goserelin 3.6 mg subcutaneous monthly and began anastrozole 1-mg daily 21 days after the first injection of goserelin. Patients continued on treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results Thirty-five patients were enrolled of which 32 were evaluable for response and toxicity. Estradiol suppression was assessed, with mean estradiol levels of 18.7 pg/mL at 3 months and 14.8 pg/mL at 6 months. One participant (3.1%) experienced a complete response, 11 (34.4%) experienced partial response, and 11 (34.4%) experienced stable disease for 6 months or longer for a clinical benefit rate of 71.9%. Median time to progression was 8.3 months (range, 2.1 to 63+) and median survival was not been reached (range, 11.1 to 63+). The most common adverse events were fatigue (50%), arthralgias (53%), and hot flashes (59%). There were no grade 4 to 5 toxicities. Conclusion The combination of goserelin plus anastrozole has substantial antitumor activity in the treatment of premenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document