scholarly journals Targeting Refractory Sarcomas and Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors in a Phase I/II Study of Sirolimus in Combination with Ganetespib (SARC023)

Sarcoma ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
AeRang Kim ◽  
Yao Lu ◽  
Scott H. Okuno ◽  
Denise Reinke ◽  
Ophélia Maertens ◽  
...  

Purpose. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are aggressive soft tissue sarcomas. Combining Hsp90 inhibitors to enhance endoplasmic reticulum stress with mTOR inhibition results in dramatic MPNST shrinkage in a genetically engineered MPNST mouse model. Ganetespib is an injectable potent small molecule inhibitor of Hsp90. Sirolimus is an oral mTOR inhibitor. We sought to determine the safety, tolerability, and recommended dose of ganetespib and sirolimus in patients with refractory sarcomas and assess clinical benefits in patients with unresectable/refractory MPNSTs. Patients and Methods. In this multi-institutional, open-label, phase 1/2 study of ganetespib and sirolimus, patients ≥16 years with histologically confirmed refractory sarcoma (phase 1) or MPNST (phase 2) were eligible. A conventional 3 + 3 dose escalation design was used for phase 1. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic measures were evaluated. Primary objectives of phase 2 were to determine the clinical benefit rate (CBR) of this combination in MPNSTs. Patient-reported outcomes assessed pain. Results. Twenty patients were enrolled (10 per phase). Toxicities were manageable; most frequent non-DLTs were diarrhea, elevated liver transaminases, and fatigue. The recommended dose of ganetespib was 200 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 with sirolimus 4 mg orally once daily with day 1 loading dose of 12 mg. In phase 1, one patient with leiomyosarcoma achieved a sustained partial response. In phase 2, no responses were observed. The median number of cycles treated was 2 (1–4). Patients did not meet the criteria for clinical benefit as defined per protocol. Pain ratings decreased or were stable. Conclusion. Despite promising preclinical rationale and tolerability of the combination therapy, no responses were observed, and the study did not meet parameters for further evaluation in MPNSTs. This trial was registered with (NCT02008877).

Sarcoma ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela C. Hirbe ◽  
Pippa F. Cosper ◽  
Sonika Dahiya ◽  
Brian A. Van Tine

Background and Objectives. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are aggressive soft tissue sarcomas with poor overall survival. Response to chemotherapy has been debated for these tumors. Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of the patients at our institution with a biopsy-proven diagnosis of MPNST that underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to surgery. Results. We retrospectively identified five patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin and ifosfamide that demonstrated a 30% reduction in tumor growth and a 60% response rate by RECIST criteria. Additionally, a metabolic response was observed in all three patients who received serial PET scans during neoadjuvant treatment. The clinical benefit rate, which includes stable disease, was 100%. Conclusions. Our data suggest that MPNSTs do respond to epirubicin and ifosfamide based chemotherapy and prospective studies are warranted to further define the clinical benefit.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS11070-TPS11070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gulam Abbas Manji ◽  
Parag Patwardhan ◽  
Shing Mirn Lee ◽  
Nanette Matos ◽  
Edward Bentlyewski ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11055-11055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gulam Abbas Manji ◽  
Brian Andrew Van Tine ◽  
Shing Mirn Lee ◽  
Alexander Raufi ◽  
Parag Patwardhan ◽  
...  

11055 Background: No effective therapy exists for unresectable malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs). We previously reported that the combination of PEX and the mTOR inhibitor S synergistically inhibited MPNST growth (CCR 20: 3146, 2014) by depleting M2 TAMs and by inhibiting receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), including c-KIT, PDGFR, CSF1R. We characterized the safety, tolerability, recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of PEX plus S in all sarcoma sub-types. Methods: Patients (pts) received PEX plus S orally in 28 days cycle as per Table. The RP2D was determined using the time-to-event continual reassessment method (TITE-CRM) in advanced sarcoma who have progressed on standard therapy. DLT was defined as any need for a dose reduction. Results: 24 pts were accrued (Acr) of which 18 were evaluable (MPNST – 6, pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS) – 3, leiomyosarcoma – 5, and other – 9). The mean age was 46y, 56% were male, and 67% had greater than 2 prior therapies. Most common ( > 20%) grade 2 or higher TEAEs were anemia (33%), WBC count decrease (28%), fatigue, neutropenia, and lymphopenia (22% each). There were 5 dose limiting toxicities (DLT): 2 for elevated LFTs both of which resolved with dose reduction, 2 for supra-therapeutic S trough levels, and 1 for grade 5 dehydration at dose level (DL) 3. Four subjects experienced a partial response (PR; -44% to -77% by RECIST, 18 – 61 wks on therapy). Seven subjects experienced stable disease (SD; +19.7% to -20.7% by RECIST; 9.4 – 30 wks on therapy). Five subjects progressed on therapy and two subjects experienced early DLTs and did not undergo tumor assessment. The RP2D is DL 3 (S 2mg/PEX 1000mg) with an estimated probability of DLT of 26.7% as determined by TITE-CRM. This recommendation is based on a target DLT rate of 25%. TAMs and immune subtypes from available tissue specimens and historical controls will be presented. Conclusions: 1000mg of PEX in combination with 2mg of S daily has an acceptable safety profile. Objective responses and durable SD was observed in PNVS and MPNST patients justifying proceeding with a multi-center single arm phase 2 study in advanced MPNST. Clinical trial information: NCT02584647. [Table: see text]


2016 ◽  
Vol 77 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Carlson ◽  
Jeffrey Jacob ◽  
Elizabeth Habermann ◽  
Amy Wagie ◽  
Aditya Raghunathan ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 282-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veli Soderlund ◽  
H. Goranson ◽  
H. C. F. Bauer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document