scholarly journals Characterization of Synovial Cytokine Patterns in Bucket-Handle and Posterior Horn Meniscal Tears

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Marco Turati ◽  
Davide Maggioni ◽  
Nicolò Zanchi ◽  
Marta Gandolla ◽  
Massimo Gorla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Cytokines ◽  
Meniscal Tear ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Posterior Horn ◽  
Meniscal Tears ◽  
Tnf Α ◽  
Cytokine Levels ◽  
Tear Pattern ◽  
Cytokine Responsiveness ◽  
Bucket Handle

The specific etiology of meniscal tears, including the mechanism of lesion, location, and orientation, is considered for its contribution to subsequent joint cytokine responsiveness, healing outcomes, and by extension, appropriate lesion-specific surgical remediation. Meniscal repair is desirable to reduce the probability of development of posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) which is strongly influenced by the coordinate generation of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines by the injured cartilage. We now present biochemical data on variation in cytokine levels arising from two particular meniscal tears: bucket-handle (BH) and posterior horn (PH) isolated meniscal tears. We selected these two groups due to the different clinical presentations. We measured the concentrations of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 in knee synovial fluid of 45 patients with isolated meniscal lesions (BH tear, n = 12 ; PH tear, n = 33 ). TNF-α levels were significantly ( p < 0.05 ) greater in the BH group compared with the PH group, whereas IL-1β levels were significantly greater ( p < 0.05 ) in the PH group compared with the BH group. Both BH and PH groups were consistent in presenting a positive correlation between concentrations of IL-6 and IL-1β. A fundamental difference in IL-10 responsiveness between the two groups was noted; specifically, levels of IL-10 were positively correlated with IL-6 in the BH group, whereas in the PH group, levels of IL-10 were positively correlated with IL-1β. Collectively, our data suggest a possible influence of the meniscal tear pattern to the articular cytokine responsiveness. This differential expression of inflammatory cytokines may influence the risk of developing PTOA in the long term.

Comparative Outcomes of Radial and Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tear Repair: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (11) ◽  
pp. 2653-2660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabella T. Wu ◽  
Mario Hevesi ◽  
Vishal S. Desai ◽  
Christopher L. Camp ◽  
Diane L. Dahm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meniscal Tear ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Meniscal Tears ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Reoperation Rates ◽  
Bucket Handle

Background: Full-thickness radial meniscal tears render the meniscus nonfunctional and have historically been treated with partial meniscectomy. As preservative techniques evolve for radial repair, comparisons with other tear patterns are necessary to evaluate repair efficacy and prognosis. Purpose: To assess clinical outcomes and reoperation rates of radial meniscal repair and to compare them to bucket-handle meniscal repair. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Radial and bucket-handle meniscal tears without concurrent root injuries undergoing surgical repair at a single institution between 2007 and 2015 were analyzed, including both all-inside and inside-out suturing techniques. Propensity matching was performed on the basis of age at surgery, sex, meniscus laterality, body mass index (BMI), and concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using a comparison pool of 70 bucket-handle repairs. Reoperation-free survival rates and Tegner, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were analyzed. Results: Twenty-four patients (18 male, 6 female; mean age, 22.8 ± 11.9 years) who underwent repair of a radial meniscal tear were followed for a mean of 3.5 years (range, 2.0-6.3 years). Significant postoperative improvements in VAS scores at rest and with use and IKDC scores were noted postoperatively ( P < .001). Five patients (20.8%) required a reoperation. Subsequently, 18 patients with radial tears (mean age, 19.1 ± 9.1 years; 12 male; mean BMI, 27.0 ± 6.2 kg/m2; 3 medial; 11 ACLR) were propensity matched to 18 patients with bucket-handle tears (mean age, 20.8 ± 5.1 years; 13 male; mean BMI, 25.0 ± 3.5 kg/m2; 3 medial; 11 ACLR). The matched radial and bucket-handle groups demonstrated similar ( P = .17) reoperation-free survival rates at 2 years (88.9% and 94.4%, respectively) and 5 years (77.8% and 87.7%, respectively). VAS and IKDC scores improved significantly after surgery ( P < .001), with no difference noted between the groups ( P ≥ .17). Patients with radial and bucket-handle meniscal repairs achieved mean postoperative Tegner scores (6.6 and 6.6, respectively) not significantly different from their preinjury levels (6.9 and 6.7, respectively) ( P ≥ .32). Conclusion: Satisfactory clinical outcomes are achievable for radial meniscal tear repair at short-term follow-up. In a robustly matched comparison, radial and bucket-handle meniscal tears demonstrate similar improvements in VAS and IKDC scores, restoration of preoperative Tegner scores, and acceptable reoperation rates. Full-thickness radial meniscal tears should be considered for repair.

scholarly journals ACL Injuries and Meniscal Lesion: Hand in Hand?

2021 ◽  
pp. 405-412
Author(s):  
U. Nivetha ◽  
. Vignesh ◽  
. Anvesh ◽  
. Munis ◽  
Navin Balasubramaniam
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Meniscal Tear ◽  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Meniscus Tear ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Meniscal Tears ◽  
Meniscal Lesion ◽  
Acl Tear ◽  
Bucket Handle

Objective: To assess the incidence, nature and pattern of meniscal tear in ACL injury. Methodology: A retrospective study was conducted among the patients who were admitted and treated for ACL tear in Saveetha Medical And College And Hospital over a 2-year period from August 2019-August 2021. There were 52 patients admitted and treated for the same. The case records of each of the patients were reviewed to find the incidence of meniscal lesion in ACL tear and were then analyzed using appropriate statistical tests. Results: 52 patients with ACL tear were reviewed in this study. ACL tear was most commonly reported in younger age group of 20-29 (46.15%). Out of which, 19(36.54%) patients had meniscal tears. About 9(47.37%) patients had lateral meniscus tear, 6(31.58%) had medial meniscus tear and 4(21.05%) had bilateral meniscal tear. It was seen that bucket handle injury (n=12) was the most common meniscus tear overall. Radial tear was most specifically common in bilateral meniscus injury (N=4). Conclusion: Meniscal tears are the most common intra articular lesions associated with ACL tear. It was most commonly reported in the age group of 20-29. We found that the incidence of lateral meniscal tear was significantly higher in the patients rather than medial meniscal tear. Bucket handle injury was the most commonly reported tear in meniscal injury. Therefore, the surgeon needs to equip himself with the necessary meniscal repair instruments in his armamentarium

scholarly journals Comparative Outcomes of All-Inside Versus Inside-Out Repair of Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tears: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 232596711877904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian T. Samuelsen ◽  
Nicholas R. Johnson ◽  
Mario Hevesi ◽  
Bruce A. Levy ◽  
Diane L. Dahm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meniscal Tear ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Meniscal Tears ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Inside Out ◽  
Bucket Handle ◽  
Repair Techniques

Background: There are limited data comparing the outcomes of all-inside versus inside-out meniscal repair techniques. Purpose: To assess failure rates and clinical outcomes after the surgical repair of bucket-handle meniscal tears utilizing either an all-inside or inside-out technique. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients with bucket-handle meniscal tears undergoing all-inside or inside-out repair at a single institution between 2003 and 2013 were analyzed. A total of 28 mensici repaired utilizing second-generation all-inside suturing devices and 42 menisci repaired using an inside-out technique were eligible for inclusion. Rigorous propensity matching was performed on the basis of age, sex, tear laterality, rim width, and concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), resulting in a total of 40 patients equally distributed between the 2 repair techniques for comparison. Retear-free survival as well as preoperative and postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Tegner scores and physical examination findings were subsequently analyzed. Results: Twenty patients who underwent all-inside repair (14 male; mean age, 23.7 ± 6.7 years) were successfully propensity matched to 20 patients who underwent inside-out meniscal repair (15 male; mean age, 22.5 ± 7.6 years), with a mean retear-free follow-up of 4.4 years (range, 2.5-7.4 years). Four (20%) all-inside repairs and 4 (20%) inside-out repairs failed over the course of follow-up ( P > .999), with a mean time to failure of 2.7 years (range, 1.3-4.4 years) and 5.0 years (range, 0.8-7.5 years), respectively ( P = .25). Increasing patient age trended toward a decreased clinical retear rate, independent of the repair technique (hazard ratio, 0.86; P = .056). There were no significant differences in the Tegner scores, IKDC scores, or range of motion between the groups as a whole or when subcategorizing by age, sex, body mass index, tear complexity, rim width, isolated versus concomitant ACLR, or medial- versus lateral-sided repair. There were no complications in the all-inside group, while there was a 10% rate of minor complications in the inside-out group ( P = .49). Conclusion: Overall, satisfactory clinical outcomes are achievable at short-term to midterm follow-up with both inside-out and all-inside repair techniques of bucket-handle meniscal tears in rigorously matched patients with similar meniscal tear patterns.

scholarly journals Pro- and Anti-Inflammatory Cytokines in the First Trimester—Comparison of Missed Miscarriage and Normal Pregnancy

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (16) ◽  
pp. 8538
Author(s):  
Maciej Kwiatek ◽  
Tomasz Gęca ◽  
Anna Kwaśniewska
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Inflammatory Cytokines ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Normal Pregnancy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Tnf Α ◽  
Cytokine Levels ◽  
Anti Inflammatory ◽  
Tgf Β1

The advantage in response of Th2 over Th1 is observed in normal pregnancy in peripheral blood. A disturbance of this balance can lead to symptoms of miscarriage and pregnancy loss. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in sera of women who were diagnosed with missed miscarriage in the first trimester and to compare this systemic immune response to the response in women with normal pregnancy. The study group consisted of 61 patients diagnosed with missed miscarriage. In total, 19 healthy women with uncomplicated first trimester created the control group. Cytokines were determined in the maternal serum by ELISA. The analysis included INF-γ, TNF-α, Il-1β, Il-4, Il-5, Il-6, Il-9, Il-10, Il-13 and TGF-β1. Th1 cytokine levels in the study group reached slightly higher values for INF-γ, Il-1β and slightly lower for IL-6 and TNF-α. In turn, Th2 cytokine levels in the study group were slightly higher (Il-9, Il-13), significantly higher (Il4, p = 0.015; Il-5, p = 0.0003) or showed no differences with the control group (Il-10). Slightly lower concentration involved only TGF-β1. Analysis of the correlation between levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines resulted in some discrepancies, without showing predominance of a specific immune response. The results did not confirm that women with missed miscarriage had an advantage in any type of immune response in comparison to women with normal pregnancy.

Cytokine Levels in Critically Ill Children With Severe Sepsis and Their Relation With the Severity of Illness and Mortality

2020 ◽  
pp. 088506662091298
Author(s):  
Suresh Kumar Angurana ◽  
Arun Bansal ◽  
Jayashree Muralidharan ◽  
Ritu Aggarwal ◽  
Sunit Singhi
Keyword(s):  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Inflammatory Cytokines ◽  
Severity Of Illness ◽  
Critically Ill Children ◽  
Positive Correlation ◽  
Tnf Α ◽  
Cytokine Levels ◽  
Anti Inflammatory ◽  
Pro Inflammatory Cytokines

Objective: To study the baseline cytokine levels and their relation with the severity of illness and mortality in critically ill children with severe sepsis. Design: Subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Setting: Pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary level teaching hospital in India. Patients: Fifty children with severe sepsis aged 3 months to 12 years. Material and Methods: Blood was collected at admission for estimation of pro-inflammatory (interleukin 6 [IL-6], IL-12p70, IL-17, and tumor necrotic factor α [TNF-α]) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10 and transforming growth factor β1 [TGF-β1]) cytokines. Primary Outcome: To find out correlation between cytokine levels and severity of illness scores (Pediatric Risk of Mortality [PRISM] III score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA], and Vasoactive-Inotropic Score [VIS]). Secondary Outcomes: To compare cytokine levels among survivors and nonsurvivors. Results: Baseline pro-inflammatory cytokine levels (median [interquartile range]) were IL-6: 189 (35-285) pg/mL, IL-12p: 48 (28-98) pg/mL, IL-17: 240 (133-345) pg/mL, and TNF-α: 296 (198-430) pg/mL; anti-inflammatory cytokine levels were IL-10: 185 (62-395) pg/mL and TGF-β1: 204 (92-290) ng/mL. Pro-inflammatory cytokines showed positive correlation with PRISM III score: IL-6 (Spearman correlation coefficient, ρ = 0.273, P = .06), IL-12 (ρ = 0.367, P = .01), IL-17 (ρ = 0.197, P = .17), and TNF-α (ρ = 0.284, P = .05), and anti-inflammatory cytokines showed negative correlation: IL-10 (ρ = −0.257, P = .09) and TGF-β (ρ = −0.238, P = .11). Both SOFA and VIS also showed weak positive correlation with IL-12 (ρ = 0.32, P = .03 and ρ = 0.31, P = .03, respectively). Among nonsurvivors (n = 5), the levels of all the measured pro-inflammatory cytokines were significantly higher as compared to survivors, IL-6: 359 (251-499) pg/mL versus 157 (97-223) pg/mL, P < .0001, IL-12p70: 167 (133-196) pg/mL versus 66 (30-100) pg/mL, P < .0001, IL-17: 400 (333-563) pg/mL versus 237 (122-318) pg/mL, P = .009, and TNF-α: 409 (355-503) pg/mL versus 330 (198-415) pg/mL, P = .002, respectively. Conclusion: In critically ill children with severe sepsis, pro-inflammatory cytokines (especially IL-12p70) showed a weak positive correlation with severity of illness and were significantly higher among nonsurvivors.

scholarly journals Incidence of Meniscal Tears Accompanying ACL Ruptures

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (11_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967114S0012
Author(s):  
Mehmet Hasan Tatari ◽  
Vugar Guliyev
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Meniscal Tear ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Variance Analysis ◽  
Meniscal Tears ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Bucket Handle ◽  
Group 1

Objectives: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a common disorder in athletes and in most cases, meniscal tears accompany. These meniscal tears can be the result of the initial trauma or the consecutive injuries in the unoperated patients. The aim of the study was to compare the incidence of meniscal tears in the patients operated because of ACL defficiency in the early or late period after the initial trauma. The age of the patient and meniscal tear pattern were the other subjects compared. Methods: The groups included 42, 72 and 129 patients respectively. Among all groups, it was shown that in 125 cases (% 51.4), a meniscal tear accompanied the ACL tear. In Group 1, 18 cases (% 42.8) had meniscal tears while 29 patients (% 37) in Group 2 and 78 patients (% 60.4) in Group 3 had any kind of meniscal tear. Bucket handle tears constituted 38 % of all tears in Group 1, 53 % in Group 2 and 56 % in Group 3. There was a significant statistical difference between the groups among the presence of meniscal tear and the period between the initial trauma and operation time. When the patients accepted the operation in the first six months after the initial trauma, the incidence of the meniscal injury decreased significantly (chi-square test) (p <0,01). There was no statistical difference between three groups among the percentage of bucket handle tears (variance analysis: p=0,196). The statistical difference was not important between the groups among the age of the patients in relation with the pattern of the meniscal tears (variance analysis: p=0,236). Results: The groups included 42, 72 and 129 patients respectively. Among all groups, it was shown that in 125 cases (% 51.4), a meniscal tear accompanied the ACL tear. In Group 1, 18 cases (% 42.8) had meniscal tears while 29 patients (% 37) in Group 2 and 78 patients (% 60.4) in Group 3 had any kind of meniscal tear. Bucket handle tears constituted 38 % of all tears in Group 1, 53 % in Group 2 and 56 % in Group 3. There was a significant statistical difference between the groups among the presence of meniscal tear and the period between the initial trauma and operation time. When the patients accepted the operation in the first six months after the initial trauma, the incidence of the meniscal injury decreased significantly (chi-square test) (p <0,01). There was no statistical difference between three groups among the percentage of bucket handle tears (variance analysis: p=0,196). The statistical difference was not important between the groups among the age of the patients in relation with the pattern of the meniscal tears (variance analysis: p=0,236) Conclusion: We can say that the incidence of meniscal tears can be decreased if the patients with ACL injury are operated early after the initial trauma. Earlier ACL reconstruction means less meniscal tear.

scholarly journals Modern treatment of meniscal tears

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 260-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmut Nedim Doral ◽  
Onur Bilge ◽  
Gazi Huri ◽  
Egemen Turhan ◽  
René Verdonk
Keyword(s):  
Sports Medicine ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
The Body ◽  
Meniscal Tears ◽  
Treatment Methods ◽  
Vital Functions ◽  
Augmentation Techniques ◽  
Tear Pattern ◽  
Modern Treatment

The complex ultrastructure of the meniscus determines its vital functions for the knee, the lower extremity, and the body. The most recent concise, reliable, and valid classification system for meniscal tears is the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (ISAKOS) Classification, which takes into account the subsequent parameters: tear depth, tear pattern, tear length, tear location/rim width, radial location, location according to the popliteal hiatus, and quality of the meniscal tissue. It is the orthopaedic surgeon’s responsibility to combine clinical information, radiological images, and clinical experience in an effort to individualize management of meniscal tears, taking into account factors related to the patient and lesion. Surgeons should strive not to operate in most cases, but to protect, repair or reconstruct, in order to prevent early development of osteoarthritis by restoring the native structure, function, and biomechanics of the meniscus. Currently, there are three main methods of modern surgical management of meniscus tears: arthroscopic partial meniscectomy; meniscal repair with or without augmentation techniques; and meniscal reconstruction. Meniscus surgery has come a long way from the old slogan, “If it is torn, take it out!” to the currently accepted slogan, “Save the meniscus!” which has guided evolving modern treatment methods for meniscal tears. This last slogan will probably constitute the basis for newer alternative biological treatment methods in the future.Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170067.

scholarly journals Mid-term evaluation of clinical and functional outcomes after arthroscopic medial longitudinal and bucket-handle meniscus repair

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 363-370
Author(s):  
Raşit Özcafer ◽  
Ferdi Dırvar ◽  
Abdülhamit Mısır ◽  
Yaşar Maksut Dinçel ◽  
Mehmet Özbey Büyükkuşçu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Meniscal Tears ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ikdc Score ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Bucket Handle Tear ◽  
Bucket Handle

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and functional outcomes following the arthroscopic medial meniscal repair. Patients and methods: A total of 50 patients (42 males, 8 females; mean age: 32.9±7.6 years; range, 17 to 48 years) who underwent arthroscopic repair for longitudinal and bucket-handle medial meniscal tears between March 2005 and October 2011 were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups as those having a longitudinal tear (patient group, n=31) and having a bucket-handle tear (control group, n=19). Preoperative and final follow-up functional outcomes were evaluated using the Lysholm Knee Score (LKS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) score, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Results: The mean follow-up was 61.7±22.8 (range, 36 to 110) months. The mean preoperative LKS, IKDC score, TAS, and KOOS scores were significantly improved at the final postoperative follow-up (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in functional outcome scores between longitudinal and bucket-handle repairs (p>0.05), and isolated repairs and concomitant meniscal repair and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (p>0.05). Conclusion: Arthroscopic meniscal repair provides similar mid-term functional and clinical outcomes for longitudinal and bucket-handle medial meniscal tears. Concomitant meniscal repair does not seem to affect meniscal healing.

scholarly journals Aging as a Risk Factor on the Immunoexpression of Pro-Inflammatory IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α Cytokines in Chronic Apical Periodontitis Lesions

Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Quésia Euclides Teixeira ◽  
Dennis de Carvalho Ferreira ◽  
Alexandre Marques Paes da Silva ◽  
Lucio Souza Gonçalves ◽  
Fabio Ramoa Pires ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Inflammatory Cytokines ◽  
Inflammatory Responses ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Apical Periodontitis ◽  
Middle Aged ◽  
Tnf Α ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cytokine Levels ◽  
Pro Inflammatory Cytokines

Persistent inflammatory responses in the elderly may act as modifiers on the progression and repair of chronic apical periodontitis lesions (CAPLs). While the involvement of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α in inflammatory responses and, particularly, in CAPL has been documented, their expression in elderly patients needs to be further characterized. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the expressions of pro-inflammatory cytokines in CAPL from elderly individuals with young/middle-aged individuals. Thirty CAPL (15 cysts and 15 granulomas) from elderly patients (>60 years) and 30 CAPL (15 cysts and 15 granuloma) from young/middle-aged individuals (20–56 years) were selected. Immunohistochemical reactions were performed against IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α. The slides were subdivided into five high-magnification fields and analyzed. The number of positive stains was evaluated for each antibody. There was no significant difference between the cytokines when the cysts and granuloma were compared in the two groups. In the young/middle-aged, only IL-1β showed a difference and was significantly higher in granulomas (p = 0.019). CAPL pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in the elderly were significantly higher than in young/middle-aged individuals (p < 0.05). The pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α were significantly higher in CAPL in the elderly compared with the young/middle-aged group. Further elaborate research studies/analyses to elucidate the reasons for and consequences of inflammation in the elderly are recommended.

All-Inside Arthroscopic Repair For Longitudinal Meniscal Tears: Clinical and Functional Results

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Grossi ◽  
Edoardo Ipponi ◽  
Eric Bufalino ◽  
Gabriele Gariffo ◽  
Gabriele Filoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Meniscal Tear ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
Repair System ◽  
Knee Score ◽  
Meniscal Tears ◽  
Lysholm Knee Score ◽  
Arthroscopic Meniscectomy ◽  
The Mean

Meniscal injuries are a common challenge in orthopaedic surgery. Depending on their location and the patient’s age and functional needs, they can be treated either conservatively or surgically. A surgical approach can consist of arthroscopic meniscectomy or meniscal suture. The latter is the treatment of choice in case of lesions involving the red-red or red-white areas of the meniscus, especially for young high-demanding patients. We report here our experience with the repair of longitudinal meniscal tears using the all-inside technique with the Fast-Fix™ 360 Meniscal Repair System (Smith & Nephew Endoscopy, Andover, MA). We retrospectively evaluated 20 consecutive cases of longitudinal meniscal tears. In 4 cases, concomitant ACL rupture was diagnosed and treated alongside the meniscal repair. All patients underwent periodic clinical evaluations. At the latest check-up, their functional outcomes were rated according to the Tegner-Lysholm Knee and KOOS scoring scales. The mean Tegner-Lysholm Knee score was 84.85 (44-100) and the mean KOOS score was 88.58. No failure or major complications were observed. Furthermore, a negative statistical association was observed between age at surgery and the post-operative Tegner-Lysholm Knee score (coef. = -1.01189 [-1.942073,-0.0817063], p = 0.035). This relation, independent of gender, meniscus involved, eventual associated ACL reconstruction, and chondral injury, suggests that functional outcomes worsen with increasing patient age. Our results suggest that the arthroscopic all-inside suture is both safe and effective in cases of longitudinal meniscal tear, considering the good post-operative functionality and low rates of local complications and surgical failures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document