scholarly journals Study on the Valuation Method for Overseas Oil and Gas Extraction Based on the Modified Trinomial Tree Option Pricing Model

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Jianye Liu ◽  
Zuxin Li ◽  
Dongkun Luo ◽  
Ruolei Liu

Wandering of oil prices at lower values and the bitter reality have forced people to look for a more accurate valuation method for overseas oil and gas extraction of China. However, the currently available resource classification method, discount cash flow (DCF) method, and real option method all suffer from their own disadvantages. This paper identifies multiple uncertainty factors such as oil prices and reserves. It then investigates the transmission mechanism of how each uncertainty factor impacts the oil and gas extraction value and quantifies the transmission efficiency. The probability distribution patterns of each uncertainty factor have been determined; the trinomial tree option pricing model is modified, with consideration upon the nonstandardness of the probability distribution. Decision points and strategies space are designed in accordance with the practical oil and gas production; and the Bermuda option is adopted to replace the conventional decision-based tree model with the probability-based tree. Finally, a backward algorithm is developed to calculate the probability at each decision point, which avoids difficulties in determining the asset volatility ratio; and a case study is presented to demonstrate application of the proposed method. Results show that decision rights for overseas investment are valuable. The value of extraction does not yet necessarily grow with higher uncertainty, and instead, it is under joint effects of the cash flow and strategy space. So, valuation should incorporate the composite value of future cash flow and decision rights. Volatility of the value of extraction is not solely dependent on the oil price, but affected by multiple factors. Similar to the Bermuda option, the decision-making behavior for oil and gas extraction occurs only at finite decision points, to which the trinomial tree option pricing model is applicable. The adoption of probability distribution can to a great extent exploit the uncertain information. Replacement of the decision-based tree with the probability-based tree provides more accurate probability distribution of the calculated value of extraction, and moreover the disperse degree of the probability can reflect how high risks are, which is conducive to decision-making for investment.

TAPPI Journal ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 69-77
Author(s):  
V.R. PERRY PARTHASARATHY

The pulp and paper industry relies heavily on the traditional discounted cash flow-based net present value (DCF-NPV) for making capital investment decisions. The deficiency of the DCF-NPV model is that it is static; once a pattern of cash flow is established, management does not have the option to change the direction when new information is available. However, flexibility to alter the investment decision is a powerful strategic and capital investment tool. Abundant research has established strong precedence for applications of “real options” in operational and strategic settings to provide useful insights in the evaluation of irreversible investments under uncertainty. The binomial or Black-Scholes option pricing model (OPM) for strategic planning and capital investment has been used in many other industries but not in the pulp and paper industry. The pulp and paper industry, though very capital intensive, has provided poor to moderate return on investment or return on capital and has never used the OPM and the flexibility it offers for capital investment decisions. This paper makes a case for using OPM for capital investment decisions by using the example of a hypothetical North American mill considering investments to modernize its papermaking operation.


1999 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 75-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Chuan Duan ◽  
Geneviève Gauthier ◽  
Jean-Guy Simonato

1982 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 58 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Bulent Gultekin ◽  
Richard J. Rogalski ◽  
Seha M. Tinic

2016 ◽  
Vol 91 ◽  
pp. 175-179
Author(s):  
Saebom Jeon ◽  
Won Chang ◽  
Yousung Park

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 1007-1025 ◽  
Author(s):  
António Câmara ◽  
Yaw-huei Wang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document