scholarly journals Retracted: Calibration of the Live Load Factor for Highway Bridges with Different Requirements of Loading

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Keyword(s):  
Highway Bridges ◽  
Load Factor ◽  
Live Load

scholarly journals Calibration of the Live Load Factor for Highway Bridges with Different Requirements of Loading

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lang Liu ◽  
Qingyang Ren ◽  
Xu Wang
Keyword(s):  
Structural Reliability ◽  
Highway Bridges ◽  
Calibration Method ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Load Factor ◽  
Live Load ◽  
Load Effect ◽  
Load Factors ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Traffic Volumes

Highway bridge load rating has been moving toward structural reliability since the issuance of AASHTO LRFR specifications; however, the recommended load factors were carried out by a few reliable truck data. The objective of this study is to calibrate the live load factor in AASHTO LRFR Rating Specification by using huge amount of WIM data collected in California for more than ten years between 2001 and 2013. Since traffic volumes, vehicular overloads, and traffic components are highly related to the load effect induced, a set of calibration equations is proposed here, in which the nominal standard load effect models are used and different requirements of loading are taken into account. By the analytical model of platoons of trucks and the extrapolation of the gathered WIM data over a short period of time to remote future over a longer time period, the expected maximum live load effects over the rating period of 5 years are also obtained. Then, the live load factor is calibrated as the product of the codified value multiplied by the ratio between the nominal standard load effect and the expected mean value. The results show that the products of the two ratios present rather constant, implying the proposed method and load configurations selected are effective. In the end, the live load factors of 1.0 and 0.7 along with load configurations are recommended for a simple span length less than 300 ft. The recommended calibration method and live load factors will eliminate the unnecessary overconservatism in rating specifications.

scholarly journals Design Live-Load Factor Calibration for Michigan Highway Bridges

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 04016014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher D. Eamon ◽  
Valid Kamjoo ◽  
Kazuhiko Shinki
Keyword(s):  
Highway Bridges ◽  
Load Factor ◽  
Live Load

Development of loading-truck model and live-load factor for the Canadian Standards Association CSA-S6 code

1987 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akhilesh C. Agarwal ◽  
Moe S. Cheung
Keyword(s):  
Highway Bridges ◽  
Load Level ◽  
Load Factor ◽  
Live Load ◽  
Limit States ◽  
Load Factors ◽  
Loading System ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Council Of Ministers ◽  
Level Loading

Studies have shown that the MS-200 loading model in the Canadian Standards Association standard CAN3-S6-M78 for design of highway bridges no longer represents modern-day heavy trucks in Canada. For the new edition of the CSA-S6 code, based on the limit states philosophy, a new loading-truck model was developed based on the Council of Ministers' loading, which is the legal load limit for interprovincial transportation in Canada. The loading model, designated as the "CS-W loading truck," provides the flexibility to adopt a multiple-level loading system appropriate to various jurisdictions.The live-load factor was determined from a statistical approach using data from a truck survey conducted across Canada in seven provinces. Responses in simple-span bridges were determined by running one or more trucks from the survey across the bridge. Based on this study, a live-load factor of 1.60 was determined and CS-600, with a gross weight of 600 kN, was selected as the standard load level. As well, the validity of the truck model and the live-load factors were checked for continuous-span bridges. Key words: highway bridges, design loads, codes and standards, live-load models, load factors, load surveys, vehicle weight regulations.

scholarly journals Live Load Distribution Factors for Skew Stringer Bridges with High-Performance-Steel Girders under Truck Loads

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iman Mohseni ◽  
Yong Cho ◽  
Junsuk Kang
Keyword(s):  
Load Distribution ◽  
Shear Force ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Structural Parameters ◽  
Highway Bridges ◽  
Live Load ◽  
High Performance Steel ◽  
Live Load Distribution Factors ◽  
Live Load Distribution ◽  
Load Distribution Factors

Because the methods used to compute the live load distribution for moment and shear force in modern highway bridges subjected to vehicle loading are generally constrained by their range of applicability, refined analysis methods are necessary when this range is exceeded or new materials are used. This study developed a simplified method to calculate the live load distribution factors for skewed composite slab-on-girder bridges with high-performance-steel (HPS) girders whose parameters exceed the range of applicability defined by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)’s Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) specifications. Bridge databases containing information on actual bridges and prototype bridges constructed from three different types of steel and structural parameters that exceeded the range of applicability were developed and the bridge modeling verified using results reported for field tests of actual bridges. The resulting simplified equations for the live load distribution factors of shear force and bending moment were based on a rigorous statistical analysis of the data. The proposed equations provided comparable results to those obtained using finite element analysis, giving bridge engineers greater flexibility when designing bridges with structural parameters that are outside the range of applicability defined by AASHTO in terms of span length, skewness, and bridge width.

Modeling maximum live load effects on highway bridges

2008 ◽  
pp. 335-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bala Sivakumar ◽  
Fred Moses ◽  
Michel Ghosn
Keyword(s):  
Highway Bridges ◽  
Live Load ◽  
Load Effects

Live-Load Response of Alabama’s High-Performance Concrete Bridge

2003 ◽  
Vol 1845 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Barnes ◽  
J. Michael Stallings ◽  
Paul W. Porter
Keyword(s):  
High Performance ◽  
High Performance Concrete ◽  
Highway Bridges ◽  
Live Load ◽  
Bottom Flange ◽  
Actual Behavior ◽  
Bridge Design ◽  
Design Specifications ◽  
Special Procedure ◽  
Aashto Lrfd

Results are reported from live-load tests performed on Alabama’s high-performance concrete (HPC) showcase bridge. Load distribution factors, deflections, and stresses measured during the tests are compared with values calculated using the provisions of the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications and AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges. Measured dynamic amplification of load effects was approximately equal to or less than predicted by both specifications. Distribution factors from both specifications were found to be conservative. Deflections computed according to AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications suggestions matched best with the measured deflections — overestimating the maximum deflections by 20% or less. Bottom flange stresses computed with AASHTO distribution factors were significantly larger than measured values. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications provisions suggest a special procedure for computing exterior girder distribution factors in bridges with diaphragms. When two or more lanes were loaded, this special procedure did not reflect the actual behavior of the bridge and resulted in very conservative distribution factors for exterior girders. Further research is recommended to correct this deficiency.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document