scholarly journals Complete Radiologic Response of Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma to Microwave Ablation Combined with Second-Line Palliative Chemotherapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Hakon Blomstrand ◽  
Karin Adolfsson ◽  
Per Sandström ◽  
Bergthor Björnsson
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Palliative Chemotherapy ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a bleak prognosis, especially for the majority of patients diagnosed with metastatic disease. The primary option for palliative treatment is chemotherapy, and responses beyond first-line treatment are rare and typically short. Here, we report a case of a 63-year-old woman with PDAC in the head of the pancreas who was initially successfully treated by pancreaticoduodenectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine. However, disease recurrence with liver and para-aortic lymph node metastases was detected only two months after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy. First-line palliative chemotherapy with gemcitabine-nab/paclitaxel was commenced. The results were discouraging, with disease progression (liver and lung metastases) detected at the first evaluation; the progression-free survival was just two months (64 days). Surprisingly, the response to second-line palliative chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil-oxaliplatin was excellent; in combination with the ablation of a liver metastasis, this treatment regimen resulted in a complete radiological response and an 11-month treatment-free interval with a sustained good performance status.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of second-line nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine after progression on FOLFIRINOX for unresectable or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: multicenter retrospective analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592092342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heejung Chae ◽  
Hyehyun Jeong ◽  
Jaekyung Cheon ◽  
Hong Jae Chon ◽  
Hyewon Ryu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Treatment Option ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3

Background: FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, folinic acid, irinotecan plus oxaliplatin) is an effective standard first-line treatment option for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). There is no clear consensus on the second-line treatment following progression on FOLFIRINOX. In this multicenter retrospective analysis, we evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of second-line nab-P/Gem (nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine) after progression on FOLFIRNOX in PDAC. Methods: Patients with unresectable or metastatic PDAC who received nab-P/Gem after progression on FOLFIRINOX between February 2016 and February 2019 were identified from five referral cancer centers in South Korea. Baseline characteristics, treatment history, survival outcomes, and toxicity profile were obtained retrospectively from medical records. Results: A total of 102 patients treated with second-line nab-P/Gem for advanced PDAC after progression on FOLFIRINOX were included. At the time of nab-P/Gem, the median age was 60 years, with males comprising 49.0%, and most (75.5%) had metastatic disease. Patients received a median of three cycles (range 1–12) of nab-P/Gem. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of second-line nab-P/Gem therapy were 9.8 (95% CI, 8.9–10.6) and 4.6 months (3.7–5.5), respectively. A partial response was achieved in 8.5%, and the disease control rate was 73.6%. From the start of first-line FOLFIRIOX, the OS1+2 and PFS1+2 were 20.9 (15.7–26.1) and 13.9 (10.8–17.0) months, respectively, with a 2-year survival rate of 45.1%. There was no treatment-related mortality and grade ⩾3 toxicity was observed in 60.2%. Conclusion: Our results showed that nab-P/Gem was an effective and tolerable second-line treatment option in medically fit patients with advanced PDAC who progressed on first-line FOLFIRNOX. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04133155

Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus FOLFIRINOX in the first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A national cohort (Comunica-TTD working group).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15707-e15707
Author(s):  
Federico Longo ◽  
Oscar Alfredo Castillo Trujillo ◽  
Juan José Serrano Domingo ◽  
Roberto Martin Huertas ◽  
Elena Corral de la Fuente ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
National Cohort ◽  
Secondary Objective ◽  
Cox Analysis

e15707 Background: Advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal disease with a five-year overall survival (OS) of less than 5%. Folfirinox and Nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine (NabPacGem) are the most active treatments in the first-line (1L). The decision to use Folfirinox or NabPacGem is a matter of debate. Methods: A retrospective cohort of advanced PDAC patients treated from January 2011 to May 2018 in four Spanish institutions was analyzed. The principal objective was to compare OS among patients receiving Folfirinox versus NabPacGem in 1L. Progression-free survival (PFS) was a secondary objective. Results: Characteristics of 251 patients included: median age 66.6 years; male 54.4%; stage IV at diagnosis 66.7%; ECOG 0/1/2 18/70/12%; treated with Folfirinox 18.3% and NabPacGem 81.7%. Patients treated with Folfirinox versus NabPacGem were younger (median age 58.3 vs. 67.9; p<0.001) and had lower ECOG (0/1/2 of 46/54/0% vs. 13/71/16%; p<0.001). Univariate analysis: median PFS 5.8 months (95%CI, 4.3 – 7.3) for Folfirinox and 4.2 months (95%CI, 3.7 – 5.2) for NabPacGem, HR=1.53 (95%CI, 1.1 – 2.1; p=0.012); median OS 12.7 months (95%CI, 8.4 – 14.3) for Folfirinox and 7.6 months (95%CI, 5.8 – 8.8) for NabPacGem, HR=1.38 (95%CI, 0.96 – 1.98; p=0.081). Multivariate Cox analysis (including type of treatment, ECOG and age) showed that ECOG was the only variable associated with PFS and OS (Table). Conclusions: In our study, advanced PDAC patients treated with Folfirinox were younger and had a better performance status than those treated with NabPacGem. We found no differences in survival between both treatments when adjusting by ECOG and age.[Table: see text]

scholarly journals Adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: retrospective real-life data

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophia Chikhladze ◽  
Ann-Kathrin Lederer ◽  
Lampros Kousoulas ◽  
Marilena Reinmuth ◽  
Olivia Sick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Biologically Active ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Real Life Data ◽  
Number Of Cycles

Abstract Background The recommendation for postoperative chemotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is based on prospective randomized trials. However, patients included in clinical trials do not often reflect the overall patient population treated in clinical practice. Materials and methods A retrospective review of all patients undergoing pancreas resection for PDAC between 2001 and 2013 was performed. Follow-up data from oncologists, general practitioners, or hospital patient files were available for 92% of patients. Results A total of 251 patients were included in our analysis. Chemotherapy was recommended for 223 patients, but 86 patients did not follow the recommendation. The application of the recommended chemotherapy, consisting of 6 cycles of gemcitabine, was only applied to 45 patients. Forty patients received the recommended number of cycles with dose reduction or prolonged intervals between cycles, and adjuvant chemotherapy was terminated prior to the intended completion of all 6 cycles in 54 patients. Survival of patients after adjuvant chemotherapy was increased compared to that of patients without chemotherapy (with recurrence 25.6 vs. 14.3 months, p = 0.001, and without recurrence 27.4 vs. 14.3 months, p <  0.001). Terminating chemotherapy prior to completion (p = 0.009) as well as a lower number of chemotherapy cycles (p = 0.026) was associated with a decreased survival. Conclusion Adjuvant chemotherapy improves overall and disease-free survival after curative pancreatic resection, but only a small fraction of patients completes the recommended 6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. Our data indicates that performance status of patients after pancreas resections for PDAC requires not only highly biologically active but also well-tolerated adjuvant chemotherapy regimens.

Phase 3 clinical Trial Evaluating 90y glass microspheres in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma of the liver who have failed first-line chemotherapy.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 474-474
Author(s):  
Maria Angela Karpf
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Glass Microspheres ◽  
First Line ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

474 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the US. Half of pts diagnosed with CRC develop liver disease. Unresectable liver metastases are responsible for morbidity/mortality. Typically, pts with metastatic CRC receive an oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based regimen as first-line chemotherapy, +/- bevacizumab. On progression, pts are treated with the regimen they did not receive during first-line chemo. A study to evaluate yttrium 90 glass microspheres (TheraSphere; 90Y) in pts with unresectable mCRC of the liver showed that pts with good performance status, no extrahepatic metastases, and ≤ 25% tumor may benefit most from 90Y. 90Y glass microspheres are approved by FDA under a Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE). This study will evaluate outcomes in this patient subset when 90Y is added to second-line SOC chemo. The objective is to evaluate efficacy/safety of 90Y in patients with liver mCRC that has progressed after first-line chemo. Methods: Open-label, multi-center, randomized study to evaluate 90Y treatment in ~340 eligible pts, in whom SOC 2nd-line chemo with either an oxaliplatin or irinotecan-based regimen is planned. Eligible pts will be randomized 1:1 to control or treatment. Treatment pts will receive a first cycle of second-line chemo within 21 days of randomization and at least 14 days after the last dose of first-line agents including VEGF inhibitors. 90Y will be administered in place of the second chemotherapy cycle. Control pts will receive planned SOC second-line chemo. Primary endpoint is progression-free survival. Secondary: overall survival, hepatic progression-free survival, time to symptomatic progression, tumor response rate, and adverse events. Pts will have regular study visits as long as they participate, at which time safety/efficacy data will be collected and recorded. Results: NA Conclusions: Given the potential benefit to mCRC pts, this Phase 3 study will evaluate 90Y in the second-line setting in patients who have progressed following SOC first-line chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT01483027.

Second-line treatment in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A meta-analysis.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15779-e15779
Author(s):  
Mohamad Bassam Sonbol ◽  
Belal Firwana ◽  
Zhen Wang ◽  
Daniel H. Ahn ◽  
Mitesh J. Borad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Modest Improvement ◽  
Random Effects Models

e15779 Background: There is paucity of data regarding the best available second-line treatment following progression on gemcitabine-based regimens in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). While a Nanoliposomal formulation of irinotecan (MM398) is considered a standard of care, there is conflicting data relating to the use of oxaliplatin in this setting. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness of adding oxaliplatin (OX) or various irinotecan (IRI) formulations to a fluoropyrimidine (FP) as a second-line in PDAC patients. Methods: We searched different databases, including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane, to identify randomized controlled trials comparing FP monotherapy to FP combination therapy that includes either oxaliplatin (FPOX) or various irinotecan formulations (FPIRI) in PDAC patients who progressed after first-line treatment. Secondary analyses were planned to assess the effectiveness of FPOX and FPIRI compared to FP. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The overall effect was pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects models. Results: Five studies (2 with FPIRI and 3 with FPOX) with 895 patients were identified. Patients randomized to FPIRI/FPOX had a significantly improved PFS (HR = 0.74, CI 0.62 to 0.89) and a trend towards an improved OS compared to FP monotherapy (HR = 0.88, CI 0.65 to 1.19). When comparing FPIRI to FP, there was an improvement in both PFS (HR = 0.64, CI 0.47 to 0.87) and OS (HR = 0.70, CI 0.55 to 0.89) in patients treated with the combination. Conversely, FPOX showed only a modest improvement in PFS (HR = 0.81, CI 0.67, 0.97) with no improvement in OS (HR = 1.03, CI 0.64 to 1.67). Conclusions: Combination chemotherapy with oxaliplatin or various irinotecan formulations seem to improve PFS vs. single agent FP. FPIRI, but not FPOX seem to confer an OS advantage. Oxaliplatin with FP following gemcitabine failure may need further confirmatory studies to establish its role in refractory pancreas cancer.

Efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with recurrent pancreatic cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 466-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiro Ohba ◽  
Hideki Ueno ◽  
Yuji Inagaki ◽  
Yasunari Sakamoto ◽  
Shunsuke Kondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
Lower Percentage ◽  
First Line ◽  
Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

466 Background: Gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) and FOLFIRINOX (FFX) are standard first-line chemotherapy regimens for metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC) patients. GEM and S-1 are also used for these patients in Japan. However, the phase 3 trials included a small proportion of recurrent pancreatic cancer (RPC) patients, and patients who had received adjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. In clinical practice, RPC is treated in the same way as MPC. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of chemotherapy between RPC and MPC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the patients with RPC or MPC who received GnP, FFX, GEM, or S-1 as first-line chemotherapy between January 2014 and March 2016 in our institution. RPC was defined as pancreatic cancer with recurrence after R0 or R1 resection. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated. Multivariate analyses of OS were performed with the use of a Cox proportional-hazard model. Results: A total of 181 patients, 40 RPC and 141 MPC, were selected in this study. RPC and MPC groups were similar with respect to age, sex, and performance status (PS). However, the RPC group had lower percentage of liver metastases (P < 0.001). The regimens were GnP/FFX/GEM/S-1: 10/3/20/7 in the RPC group and 37/34/67/3 in the MPC group, respectively. In the RPC group, 31 of 40 patients had received adjuvant chemotherapy; S-1/GEM: 24/7. The median OS was 16.6 months in the RPC group as compared with 9.7 months in the MPC group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37–1.10, P = 0.11). The median PFS was 4.8 months in the RPC group and 4.4 months in the MPC group (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.57–1.30, P = 0.47). The RR was 10% versus 14% (P = 0.79), the DCR was 50% versus 52% (P = 0.86), in the two groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed PS (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.38–3.49) and liver metastases (HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.47–2.34) were independent predictors of OS. On the other hand, RPC or MPC was not found to be an independent prognostic factor (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.67–2.13). Conclusions: It is suggested that chemotherapy in RPC may have similar efficacy compared to MPC. The relatively longer OS in the RPC group seems to associate with the lower percentage of liver metastases.

Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRINOX in elderly patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15729-e15729
Author(s):  
Jae Hyup Jung ◽  
Jingu Kang ◽  
Jong-Chan Lee ◽  
Jin-Hyeok Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Elderly Group ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Tertiary Teaching ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

e15729 Background: Although FOLFIRINOX showed improved efficacy in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA), physicians still hesitate to administrate FOLFIRINOX in elderly patients despite of being in a good performance status. We investigated the efficacy and toxicity of FOLFIRINOX in elderly patients with advanced PDA. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records of advanced PDA patients administrated a first-line FOLFIRINOX from January 2012 to July 2017 in a single tertiary teaching hospital. All the patients were divided into two groups: non-elderly group A (age < 70) and elderly group B (age≥70). Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and toxicities were compared between two groups using Cox proportional hazard model. Results: A total of 214 patients (Group A 176; B 38) met the eligible criteria. Median age was 61 years old (29-80, group A 59; B 73) and median cycle of FOLFIRINOX was 7.0 (1–75, group A and B 7.0). Median OS and PFS did not differ between group A and B (OS, 11.8 vs 12.0 months, hazard ratio [HR] 1.165, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.785–1.728; PFS 6.5 vs 7.3 months, HR 1.003, 95% CI 0.694–1.451, respectively). When we analyzed OS according to tumor stage (locally advanced and metastatic), group A and B showed comparable median OS (15.8 vs 13.5 months in locally advanced PDA; 8.6 vs 9.8 months in metastatic PDA, respectively) There were no significant differences in terms of hematologic toxicities except Gr 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (Group A 3.4%; B 13.2%, P = 0.028). Fatigue and diarrhea were observed more often in Group B than in group A (47.4% vs 10.2%, P = 0.000; 18.4% vs 4.5%, P = 0.010, respectively), all of which were manageable. More patients in group B received dose adjusted FOLFIRINOX than in group A, although there was no statitical significance. Conclusions: FOLFIRINOX could be considered as the first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced PDA as well as non-elderly patients when dosage modified appropriately, given comparable efficacies and acceptable and manageable toxicities. More studies are warranted to confirm this issue.

Phase III AXIS trial for second-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Effect of prior first-line treatment duration and axitinib dose titration on axitinib efficacy.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 354-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian I. Rini ◽  
Bernard J. Escudier ◽  
M Dror Michaelson ◽  
Sylvie Negrier ◽  
Martin Eric Gore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Dose Titration ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Sunitinib Treatment ◽  
Prior Therapy

354 Background: Axitinib is a potent and selective second-generation inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs) 1, 2, and 3. In the phase 3 AXIS trial of axitinib vs sorafenib for second-line mRCC, axitinib significantly prolonged median progression-free survival (mPFS) (6.7 vs 4.7 months; hazard ratio 0.665; P<0.0001). Here, we evaluated the effect of prior sunitinib treatment duration and axitinib dose titration on subsequent axitinib efficacy. Methods: Eligible patients had clear-cell mRCC; measurable RECIST-defined progressive disease after 1 prior first-line systemic therapy; and Eastern Cooperative Oncology performance status (PS) 0/1. Patients were stratified by PS and prior therapy, and randomized 1:1 to either axitinib, at a starting dose of 5 mg twice daily (BID), or sorafenib, 400 mg BID. Patients without toxicity >grade 2 and BP <150/90 mmHg without antihypertensive medication for >2 weeks were eligible to increase axitinib dose to 7 mg BID and then to 10 mg BID. Results: The mPFS for patients receiving at least one total daily axitinib dose >10 mg (dose-titrated group; n=132) was 6.6 months [95% CI 4.7–8.3] and 8.3 months [95% CI 6.0–10.2] for patients receiving axitinib ≤10 mg (n=227). A total of 194 patients (53.7%) in the axitinib arm and 195 patients (53.9%) in the sorafenib arm had prior sunitinib treatment. The mPFS for patients with duration of prior sunitinib treatment ≥6 months and <6 months were 4.8 months [95% CI 4.5–6.5] and 4.6 months [95% CI 2.8–8.3] for axitinib patients; and 4.6 months [95% CI 2.9–4.9] and 2.9 months [95% CI 2.8–4.6), for sorafenib patients. The mPFS for duration of prior sunitinib ≥9 months and <9 months were 6.3 months [95% CI 4.6–6.7] and 4.5 months [95% CI 2.8–6.4] for axitinib patients; and 4.6 months [95% CI 2.8–4.9] and 2.9 months [95% CI 2.8–4.7]) for sorafenib patients. Conclusions: Duration of prior sunitinib ≥9 months may be associated with a longer PFS on second-line VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Both axitinib dose-increased and non-increased patients had longer PFS compared with the sorafenib arm.

DocOx (AIO-PK0106): A phase II trial with docetaxel and oxaliplatin as a second-line systemic therapy for patients with advanced and/or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas—Final results.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 352-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Jens Ettrich ◽  
Lukas Perkhofer ◽  
Volker Kaechele ◽  
Andreas W. Berger ◽  
Melanie Guethle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3

352 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma still remains a major cause of cancer related deaths in the western world. The current study was conducted to confirm the activity and feasibility of docetaxel/ oxaliplatin combination in second line treatment of advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Methods: Prospective single arm, non-randomized, multi-center, Simon’s two stage phase II trial using docetaxel (75 mg/m2, 60 min, d 1) and oxaliplatin (80 mg/m2, 120 min, d 2) in 21-day cycles. Duration of the trial was scheduled up two 8 cycles. Primary endpoint was tumor response according to RECIST 1.0. Secondary endpoints were progression free survival, overall survival, safety/toxicity, quality of life and clinical benefit. Results: Data represents the intention to treat analysis of 44 patients included between 2008 and 2012. The majority of patients received a gemcitabine based first-line chemotherapy (95.5%). The primary endpoint of tumor response was achieved in 15.9% (7 partial remissions, no complete remission), with a disease control rate of 48% after the first two treatment cycles. Median progression free survival was 7 weeks (CI 6-15.9 weeks) and overall survival 40 weeks (CI 20.4-56.4 weeks). No unexpected adverse events occured. The recorded AEs were mainly hematologic (neutropenia grade 3/4 63.6%, febrile neutropenia 4.6%), gastrointestinal (29.6% grade 3/4 AEs) and infectious (18.2% grade 3/4 AEs). Conclusions: In this single-arm second line trial for the treatment of advanced PDAC, the combination of docetaxel and oxaliplatin shows promising results comparable with other second line protocols such as OFF (oxaliplatin, 5-FU, leucovorin) or liposomal irinotecan (MM-398) plus 5-FU/leucovorin (NAPOLI 1-trial). Some patients seem to benefit particularly as indicated by long periods of treatment in this setting. Even after 8 cycles of treatment with DocOx, partial response was observed in 2 patients and stable disease in another 6 patients corresponding to a disease control rate of 18%. The toxicity profile was quite tolerable and comparable to other second line studies. Clinical trial information: NCT00690300.

The prognostic value of stroma desmoplasia in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 211-211
Author(s):  
Emmanouil Fokas ◽  
Michael A Silva ◽  
Zenobia D'Costa ◽  
Robin Bockelmann ◽  
Zahir Soonawalla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Smooth Muscle Actin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Pancreatic Stellate Cells ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Local Progression

211 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) often presents an abundant desmoplastic stroma. We assessed the prognostic value of stroma density and activity in patients with resectable PDAC treated with surgery and adjuvant gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Methods: FFPE-tissue originating from the pancreatectomy of 145 patients was immunohistochemicallystained for haematoxylin-eosin and Masson’s trichrome to assess stroma density, and alpha-smooth muscle actin (αSMA) expression for activated pancreatic stellate cells. Their expression was correlated with clinicopathological characteristics as well as overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local progression-free survival (LPFS) and distant metastases free-survival (DMFS). Results: After a mean follow-up of 20 months (range, 2-69 months), the median OS was 21 months and the 3-year OS was 35.7 %. In multivariate analysis, highly-dense stroma was an independent prognostic parameter for OS (p = 0.001), PFS (p = 0.007), LPFS (p = 0.001) and DMFS (p = 0.002), while αSMA expression lacked significance. Interestingly, highly-dense stroma retained significance for the four clinical endpoints only in early (pT1-2) but not late (pT3-4) stage tumors. Additionally, late pT-stage (pT3-4), the presence of lymph node metastases (pN+ vs pN0), perineural/neural invasion PNI and adjuvant chemotherapy also correlated with prognosis in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: In summary, stroma density represents an independent prognostic marker in PDAC patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Our findings highlight the complexity of desmoplasia and indicate that highly-dense stroma is associated with better outcome. Further validation of the prognostic value of stroma as a biomarker and its role in PDAC biology is warranted and will be performed in a prospective study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document