scholarly journals Intravitreal Injections in Arc Sterile Setting: Safety Profile after More Than 10,000 Treatments

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Claudio Furino ◽  
Maria Oliva Grassi ◽  
Vito Bini ◽  
Annalisa Nacucchi ◽  
Francesco Boscia ◽  
...  

Purpose. To report the occurrence of endophthalmitis and other complications after intravitreal injections (IVIs) in the Arc Sterile setting. Methods. A retrospective study that enrolled all patients who underwent IVIs between November 2017 and March 2019, collecting data about the patient’s gender and age, type of injected drug, diagnosis, other ocular pathologies, physician and possible occurrence of endophthalmitis, or other complications. Results. Ten thousand and eighty-three IVIs were performed during the study period, involving 2014 eyes of 1,670 patients with an average age of 71.37 ± 11.63 years. The injected drugs included ranibizumab (54.6%), aflibercept (38.0%), dexamethasone (6.7%), pegaptanib (0.3%), bevacizumab (0.4%), and ocriplasmin (0.01%). The diagnosis included neovascular age-related macular degeneration (859), myopic choroidal neovascularization (154), diabetic macular edema (576), retinal vein occlusion (203), and miscellaneus diagnosis (222). No cases of endophthalmitis were recorded. One hundred and sixty-nine cases of ocular hypertension were detected, while the most frequent complication was subconjunctival hemorrhage, identified after 1,180 IVIs. The residents performed over 80% of IVIs, but there was no statistically significant difference in incidence of complications between the residents group and consultants group. Conclusions. Arc Sterile seems to be a safe setting in which IVIs can be carried out, regarding infective risk, and it is easy to set up compared to operation theatre and useful to improve intravitreal injections governance.

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M S Abdaltawab ◽  
Z F Ismail ◽  
W M A Ebeid ◽  
S M Fawzy

Abstract Aim of the Work The aim of this work is to compare the response of treatment with ranibizumab in terms of visual acuity in cases of CNV secondary to pathological myopia versus CNV secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Methods This prospective, comparative study included ten eyes newly diagnosed as having CNV secondary to pathological myopia, and 10 eyes newly diagnosed as having subfoveal active CNV secondary to AMD. All patients had 3 monthly intravitreal Injections of 0.50 mg (in 0.05 ml of solution) ranibizumab with monthly evaluation of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) by Landolt C chart, and also calculated in Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (Log MAR). Results pretreatment there was no significant difference between the two groups as the mean VA (Log Mar) was 1.31 ± 0.2 in AMD group and 1.17 ± 0.3 in MCNV group of P value = 0.431 and also post three IVI of ranibizumab showed no significant difference between the two groups as the mean VA (Log Mar) was 1.22 ± 0.2 for AMD and 1.22 ± 0.5 for MCNV of P value = 0.635. Conclusion there was no significant difference in BCVA between AMD and MCNV groups after three intravitreal injections of ranibizumab.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 4109
Author(s):  
Małgorzata Seredyka-Burduk ◽  
Michał Wiciński ◽  
Sławomir Liberski ◽  
Daria Marczak ◽  
Magdalena Pol ◽  
...  

We evaluated the effect of three monthly intravitreal injections of aflibercept on the serum concentration of interleukin 17A (IL-17A), monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1/CCL2), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and placental growth factor (PlGF) in treatment-naive patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Twenty-two eyes of twenty-two patients with nAMD scheduled for the initial loading phase of intravitreal aflibercept (2 mg/0.05 mL) were included. Serum VEGF, PlGF, MCP-1/CCL2 and IL-17A levels were determined four times in each individual—just before the first injection, 2–3 days after the first injection, just before the third injection, and then 2–3 days after the third aflibercept injection. A statistically significant difference was found between the serum PlGF and IL-17A levels measured before the first injection and after the initial loading phase, with a mean value (MV) of 440.884 vs. 302.151 (p = 0.023) for PlGF and MV = 139.088 pg/mL vs. 151.233 pg/mL (p = 0.016) for IL-17A, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences for VEGF and MCP-1/CCL2 between any of the compared measurements. We reveal that repeated injections of aflibercept promote an increase in serum IL-17A concentration, which may lead to a systemic inflammatory response mediated by IL-17A, but not by MCP-1.


2021 ◽  
pp. 48-56
Author(s):  
Atsuta Ozaki ◽  
Hisashi Matsubara ◽  
Masahiko Sugimoto ◽  
Manami Kuze ◽  
Mineo Kondo ◽  
...  

Intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) is essential for the treatment of macular diseases such as wet age-related macular degeneration and macular edema. Although continued treatment is needed to maintain good vision, some patients cannot continue such injections for various reasons, including specific phobias. Here, we report a case of a patient with a specific phobia of intravitreal injections who could resume treatment after undergoing combined drug and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). A 74-year-old Japanese man diagnosed with retinal angiomatous proliferation by fluorescein angiography and indocyanine green angiography was treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF injection. However, at 8 months after the first treatment, he became difficult to treat because of a phobia of injections. He was treated with photodynamic therapy, but his macular edema did not improve. After a psychiatric consultation, he was diagnosed with a specific phobia of intravitreal injections. Combined drug and CBT enabled him to resume receiving intravitreal injections. This case demonstrates that a specific phobia of intravitreal injections may benefit from combined drug and CBT. In this regard, some patients with high anxiety and fear of intravitreal injections should be referred to a psychiatrist at an early stage.


2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212110609
Author(s):  
Ibrar Ahmed ◽  
Panayiotis Maghsoudlou ◽  
Hani Hasan ◽  
Allaaeldin Abumattar ◽  
Nimish Shah

Introduction Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections are the most frequently performed outpatient procedure in the UK. Ophthalmic allied healthcare professionals are replacing medical professionals in delivering injections nationwide. The use of injection assist devices such as Precivia® has been well established and increasingly adopted to aid in their safe delivery. We present outcomes of nurse-led intravitreal injections using the Precivia® injection assist device over a five-year period in the UK. Methods A retrospective review was completed of all anti-VEGF intravitreal injections delivered at the Great Western Hospital between May 2015 and May 2020. Results Over the five-year study period, 2318 patients underwent a total of 26,923 intravitreal injections; 20,421 (75.8%) of which were delivered by appropriately trained ophthalmic nurses. The annual number of injections increased year-on-year from 2112 injections in 2015-2016 to 5410 injections in 2019-2020. The mean age of patients was 75.7±12.2 years with a female-to-male ratio was 1.17:1. Wet age-related macular degeneration represented the major indication for injections followed by retinal vein occlusion and diabetic maculopathy respectively. Three cases of post-injection endophthalmitis out of 20,421 (0.015%) injections in nurse injection group were identified during the study period. There were no cases of lens touch, retinal detachment or systemic thromboembolic events. Conclusion Use of the Precivia® intravitreal injection assist device by trained ophthalmic allied health professionals is a safe and cost-effective way to deliver intravitreal injections service.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaine Mai ◽  
Joyce Chan ◽  
Levina Goon ◽  
Braeden K. Ego ◽  
Jack Bevers ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Over the past decade, human Interleukin 33 (hIL-33) has emerged as a key contributor to the pathogenesis of numerous inflammatory diseases. Despite the existence of several commercial hIL-33 assays spanning multiple platform technologies, their ability to provide accurate hIL-33 concentration measurements and to differentiate between active (reduced) and inactive (oxidized) hIL-33 in various matrices remains uncertain. This is especially true for lower sample volumes, matrices with low hIL-33 concentrations, and matrices with elevated levels of soluble Interleukin 1 Receptor-Like 1 (sST2), an inactive form of ST2 that competes with membrane bound ST2 for hIL-33 binding. Results We tested the performance of several commercially available hIL-33 detection assays in various human matrices and found that most of these assays lacked the sensitivity to accurately detect reduced hIL-33 at biologically relevant levels (sub-to-low pg/mL), especially in the presence of human sST2 (hsST2), and/or lacked sufficient target specificity. To address this, we developed and validated a sensitive and specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) capable of detecting reduced and total hIL-33 levels even in the presence of high concentrations of sST2. By incorporating the immuno-polymerase chain reaction (iPCR) platform, we further increased the sensitivity of this assay for the reduced form of hIL-33 by ~ 52-fold. Using this hIL-33 iPCR assay, we detected hIL-33 in postmortem human vitreous humor (VH) samples from donors with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and found significantly increased hIL-33 levels when compared to control individuals. No statistically significant difference was observed in aqueous humor (AH) from AMD donors nor in plasma and nasosorption fluid (NF) from asthma patients compared to control individuals. Conclusions Unlike existing commercial hIL-33 assays, our hIL-33 bioassays are highly sensitive and specific and can accurately quantify hIL-33 in various human clinical matrices, including those with high levels of hsST2. Our results provide a proof of concept of the utility of these assays in clinical trials targeting the hIL-33/hST2 pathway.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-70
Author(s):  
Juhn AT ◽  
Shyu AP ◽  
Benjamin J ◽  
Zhang Y

Subthreshold Diode Micropulse (SDM) laser is a relatively new treatment modality that confers very little to no anatomical risk to the retina. However, its efficacy is still being studied, and the scenario where SDM is most useful is still being elucidated. This paper reviews articles from 1997 to 2017 and reviews the settings, results, and outcomes of SDM in various clinical settings including diabetic macular edema, branch retinal vein occlusion, central serous Chorioretinopathy, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and age-related macular degeneration.


Author(s):  
Ahmad Mirshahi ◽  
Alireza Lashay ◽  
Hamid Riazi-Esfahani ◽  
Nazanin Ebrahimiadib ◽  
Hassan Khojasteh ◽  
...  

Purpose: To report the results of intravitreal injection of a bevacizumab biosimilar called Stivant®. Methods: This prospective interventional case series was conducted on eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), and diabetic macular edema (DME). Stivant® was injected in three consecutive months and changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were measured at baseline and monthly up to one month after the third injection. Results: Three hundred and eighty-five eyes with DME (234 eyes, 61%), nAMD (87 eyes, 22%), and macular edema secondary to RVO (64 eyes, 17%) were enrolled. The mean ± standard deviation age of the patients was 61.7 ± 7.20 years. The mean BCVA and CMT changed from 0.63 ± 0.3 to 0.51 ± 0.3 LogMAR (P = 0.12 ) and from 420.4 ± 47.3μm at baseline to 316.7 ± 50.6 μm (P < 0.001) in the DME group; from 0.79 ± 0.3 to 0.68 ± 0.3 LogMAR (P = 0.19) and from 376.1 ± 31.7 μm to 303 ± 31.3 μm (P = 0.019) in the nAMD group; and from 0.81 ± 0.4 to 0.63 ± 0.4 LogMAR (P = 0.05) and from 424.21 ± 18 μm to 303.4 ± 18.8 μm (P < 0.001) in the RVO group, respectively. Conclusion: Our limited experience showed that the intravitreal injection of Stivant® was well tolerated. Although the results of this case series showed relative improvement in CMT one month after the last injection of Stivant®, BCVA improvement was statistically significant only in the RVO group. This would be essential to design a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the non-inferiority of Stivant® in comparison to bevacizumab.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document