scholarly journals Randomized Comparison of Terumo® Coated Slender™ versus Terumo® Noncoated Traditional Sheath during Radial Angiography or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Birthe Sindberg ◽  
Christel Gry Aagren Nielsen ◽  
Marianne Hestbjerg Poulsen ◽  
Martin Bøhme Rasmussen ◽  
Steen Carstensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radial Artery ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Procedural Success ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Sheath Insertion

Background. The transradial approach is generally associated with few complications. However, periprocedural pain is still a common issue, potentially related to sheath insertion and/or arterial spasm, and may result in conversion to femoral access. Radial artery occlusion (RAO) following the procedure is also a potential risk. We evaluate whether the design of the sheath has any impact on these variables. Methods. A total of 1,000 patients scheduled for radial CAG or PCI were randomized (1:1) to the use of a Slender or a Standard sheath during the procedure. Randomization was stratified according to chosen sheath size (5, 6, 7 French) and gender. A radial band was used to obtain hemostasis after the procedure, employing a rapid deflation technique. A reverse Barbeau test was performed to evaluate radial artery patency after removal of the radial band, and level of pain was assessed using a numeric rating scale (NRS). Results. Use of the Slender sheath was associated with less pain during sheath insertion (median NRS 1 versus 2, p=0.02), whereas no difference was observed in pain during the procedure, radial procedural success rates, use of analgesics and sedatives during the procedure, and radial artery patency following the procedure. Rate of RAO was 1.5% with no difference between groups. Conclusion. The use of the hydrophilic coated Slender sheath during radial CAG or PCI was associated with less pain during sheath insertion, whereas no difference in other endpoints was observed. A rapid deflation technique was associated with RAO of only 1.5%.

scholarly journals Vascular Access and Chronic Total Occlusion Angioplasty

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 90
Author(s):  
Smith David ◽  
Hailan Ahmed ◽  
Chase Alexander ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Access ◽  
Chronic Total Occlusion ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Total Occlusion ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Arterial Access ◽  
Procedural Success

The hybrid algorithim approach, together with innovative new technologies, has lead to increased interest in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and increasing procedural success rates. Unlike non-CTO PCI, there is an increased rate of femoral access. When considering arterial access in CTO PCI, a balance is needed between anticipated procedural difficulty, planned CTO strategy and the desire to minimise the risk of vascular access-related complications. We review the evidence for best practice with respect to femoral puncture technique and also assess the technologies and techniques available to place larger inner diameter catheters into the radial artery.

scholarly journals Feasibility and Safety of Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Distal Transradial Access

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-Jui Lin ◽  
Wei-Chieh Lee ◽  
Chieh-Ho Lee ◽  
Wen-Jung Chung ◽  
Shu-Kai Hsueh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radial Artery ◽  
Chronic Total Occlusion ◽  
Vascular Complications ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Total Occlusion ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Procedural Success

Aims: The current study aims to verify the feasibility and safety of chronic total occlusion (CTO)-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via the distal transradial access (dTRA).Methods: Between April 2017 and December 2019, 298 patients who underwent CTO PCI via dTRA were enrolled in this study. The baseline demographic and procedural characteristics were listed and compared between groups. The incidences of access-site vascular complications and procedural complications and mortality were recorded.Results: The mean J-CTO (Japanese chronic total occlusion) score was 2.6 ± 0.9 points. The mean access time was 4.6 ± 2.9 min, and the mean procedure time was 115.9 ± 55.6 min. Left radial snuffbox access was performed successfully in 286 patients (96.5%), and right radial snuffbox access was performed successfully in 133 patients (97.7%). Bilateral radial snuffbox access was performed in 107 patients (35.9%). 400 dTRA (95.5%) received glidesheath for CTO intervention. Two patients (0.7%) developed severe access-site vascular complications. None of the patients experienced severe radial artery spasm and only 2 patients (0.5%) developed radial artery occlusion during the follow-up period. The overall procedural success rate was 93.5%. The procedural success rate was 96.5% in patients with antegrade approach and 87.7% in patients with retrograde approach.Conclusions: It is both safe and feasible to use dTRA plus Glidesheath for complex CTO intervention. The incidences of procedure-related complications and severe access-site vascular complications, and distal radial artery occlusion were low.

Access-site complications of the transradial approach: Rare but still there.

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stelina Alkagiet ◽  
Dimitrios Petroglou ◽  
Dimitrios N. Nikas ◽  
Theofilos M. Kolettis
Keyword(s):  
Radial Artery ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Tissue Loss ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Transradial Approach ◽  
Financial Benefits ◽  
Eversion Endarterectomy ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Sheath Insertion ◽  
Venous Fistula

: In the past decade, the Transradial Approach (TRA) has constantly gained ground among interventional cardiologists. TRA's anatomical advantages, in addition to patients' acceptance and financial benefits, due to rapid patient mobilization and shorter hospital stay, made it the default approach in most catheterization laboratories. Access-site complications of TRA are rare, and usually of little clinical impact, thus they are often overlooked and underdiagnosed. Radial Artery Occlusion (RAO) is the most common, followed by radial artery spasm, perforation, hemorrhagic complications, pseudoaneurysm, arterio-venous fistula and even rarer complications, such as nerve injury, sterile granuloma, eversion endarterectomy or skin necrosis. Most of them are conservatively treated, but rarely, surgical treatment may be needed and late diagnosis may lead to life-threatening situations, such as hand ischemia or compartment syndrome and tissue loss. Additionally, some complications may eventually lead to TRA failure and switch to a different approach. On the other hand, it is the opinion of the authors that non-occlusive radial artery injury, commonly included in TRA's complications in the literature, should be regarded more as an anticipated functional and anatomical cascade, following radial artery puncture and sheath insertion.

Low-molecular-weight-heparin in radial artery occlusion treatment: the LOW-RAO randomized study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthaios Didagelos ◽  
Areti Pagiantza ◽  
Thomas Zegkos ◽  
Christos Papanastasiou ◽  
Konstantina Zarra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Radial Artery ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparin ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Radial Artery Occlusion

Radial artery occlusion (RAO) is the commonest complication of transradial catheterization. There is no evidence-based therapy, in the frame of a randomized control study, for the treatment of RAO. The purpose of the LOW-RAO study is to question the hypothesis if low-molecular-weight heparin is effective in the treatment of RAO after transradial coronary catheterization (both angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention). It is a prospective, open label, randomized controlled trial that will randomize 60 patients with RAO, irrespective of symptoms, into two groups, one receiving anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin and the other receiving no treatment. The primary end point is improvement in radial artery patency rate at 4 weeks after the procedure. Trial registration number: NCT04196309 (ClinicalTrials.gov)

P6523Radial artery occlusion: predictors, methods for reducing the frequency of complications-a single center study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Ognerubov ◽  
A Tereshchenko ◽  
E Merkulov ◽  
S Provatorov ◽  
G Arutyunyan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Radial Artery ◽  
Stable Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Ulnar Artery ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Careful Examination ◽  
Radial Access ◽  
Short Time

Abstract Radial access has great advantages in terms of the frequency of complications, but it has one specific complication - radial artery occlusion (RAO). This complication often does not manifest itself in any way; however, it limits the use of access for the future interventions. Aim To compare methods of short and traditional hemostasis and to identify the main predictors of RAO after radial access. Materials and methods During the period from 2012 to 2018, 2000 patients were included in the study, which consisted of two parts: prospective - 1000 patients who underwent coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stable coronary artery disease, and retrospective part of the study, which included 1000 patients admitted for PCI from other clinics. In a prospective study, patients were divided into two groups: after coronary angiography and PCI, respectively (n=500 in the coronary angiography group and n=500 in the PCI group), and then randomized. Hemostatic bandages in the first group of patients (n=250) were removed after 12–24 hours, in the second group (n=250) - after 4±1 hours. When the occlusion of the radial artery was detected, all patients underwent an hour-long compression of the ipsilateral ulnar artery to recanalize acute RAO. Results The frequency of RAO in the retrospective part of the study was 21.8%. The frequency of RAO in the prospective part of the study was 10.2% with a traditional time hemostasis and 1.4% with a short-time compression (P<0.001). Predictors of the RAO are illustrated in table 1. Predictors of bleeding were PCI (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.01–0.67, P=0.05) and weight (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02–1.18, P=0.01). Table 1. Predictors of RAO Variables Odds ratio 95% Confidential interval Significance, P Traditional-time hemostasis 8.78 4.2–21.5 <0.001 Diabetes mellitus+smoking 18.1 12.7–26.7 <0.001 Diabetes mellitus 0.45 0.25–0.83 0.009 Body mass index 0.95 0.91–0.99 0.02 Male 1.75 1.01–3.18 0.05 Protein C 0,86 0,75–0,96 0,01 Conclusion Careful examination of the patient for detecting RAO before and after interventions is essential. Short hemostasis with compression of the ipsilateral ulnar artery reduce the frequency of RAO. For short-time hemostasis, special attention should be paid to patients after PCI and with low BMI, as far as these factors are associated with a greater risk of bleeding after removal of the compression bandage.

scholarly journals Influence of Puncture Site on Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Coronary Intervention

2016 ◽  
Vol 129 (8) ◽  
pp. 898-902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi-Le Bi ◽  
Xiang-Hua Fu ◽  
Xin-Shun Gu ◽  
Yan-Bo Wang ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radial Artery ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Puncture Site ◽  
Radial Artery Occlusion

scholarly journals Comparison of transradial coronary intervention for left main bifurcation disease using the new Braidin® slender 7 Fr sheath and a standard 6 Fr sheath

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (9) ◽  
pp. 030006052095472
Author(s):  
Yingkai Xu ◽  
Yingkai Li ◽  
Jiancai Yu ◽  
Deguang Wang ◽  
Qi Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radial Artery ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Left Main ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Occlusion Rate ◽  
Radial Artery Occlusion

Objectives To compare the effectiveness and safety of the Braidin® slender 7 Fr sheath with a standard 6 Fr sheath for treating left main bifurcation disease. Methods From January 2017 to March 2019, 277 patients with left main bifurcation disease who underwent the transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention were divided into the slender 7 Fr sheath group (Braidin® slender 7 Fr sheath, n = 154) and standard 6 Fr sheath group (n = 123). Pathological features, surgical effect, and complications were evaluated. Results The rate of using the classic crush technique was significantly higher in the slender 7 Fr sheath group than in the standard 6 Fr sheath group. The slender 7 Fr sheath group had a significantly shorter operation time than the standard 6 Fr sheath group. There were no significant differences in the radial artery occlusion rate after surgery and at 1 month of follow-up between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that 6 Fr and Braidin slender 7 Fr sheaths did not predict radial artery occlusion. Conclusion The Braidin slender 7 Fr sheath has a superior operative process and similar safety for the radial artery as that of the standard 6 Fr sheath for treating left main bifurcation disease.

Procedural Success Rates from the Standard Versus Ultrasound-Guided Radial and Femoral Access (SURF) trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. S422
Author(s):  
P. Nguyen ◽  
A. Makris ◽  
A. Hennessy ◽  
S. Jayanti ◽  
A. Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rates ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Procedural Success

Safety and feasibility of ulnar artery access for neuroangiography and neurointervention: a case series

2020 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2020-016416
Author(s):  
Rimal H Dossani ◽  
Muhammad Waqas ◽  
Michael K Tso ◽  
Gary B Rajah ◽  
Daniel Popoola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radial Artery ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Ulnar Artery ◽  
Middle Meningeal Artery ◽  
Artery Occlusion ◽  
Femoral Access ◽  
Radial Access ◽  
Diagnostic Angiography ◽  
Neurointerventional Procedures

BackgroundRadial access has become popular among neurointerventionalists because it has favorable risk profiles compared with femoral access. Difficulties in accessing or navigating the radial artery have been viewed as a reason to convert to femoral access, but ulnar artery access may prevent complications associated with transfemoral procedures.ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and feasibility of ulnar access for neurointerventions and diagnostic neuroangiographic procedures.MethodsConsecutive patients who underwent diagnostic angiography or neurointerventional procedures via ulnar access between July 1, 2019 and April 15, 2020 were included. Data recorded were demographics, procedure indication, devices, technique, and complications. Descriptive analysis was performed.ResultsUlnar artery access was obtained for 21 procedures in 18 patients (mean age 70.3±7.8 years; nine men). Procedures included 13 diagnostic angiograms and eight neurointerventions (3 left middle meningeal artery embolization, 1 of which was aborted; 2 carotid artery stenting; 2 angioplasty; 1 mechanical thrombectomy for in-stent thrombosis). A right-sided approach with ultrasound guidance was used for all cases except one. Indications included small caliber radial artery (n=9), radial artery occlusion (n=10), and radial artery preservation for potential bypass (n=2). A 5-French slender sheath was used for diagnostic angiography; a 6-French slender sheath was used for neurointerventions. No case required conversion to femoral access. Two patients had minor hematomas after the procedure; one other had ulnar artery occlusion on 30-day ultrasonography.ConclusionUlnar access is safe and feasible for diagnostic and interventional neuroangiographic procedures. It provides a useful alternative to radial access, potentially avoiding complications associated with femoral access.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document