scholarly journals Difference between Mechanical Alignment in Navigation and Scanogram during Total Knee Arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohan Bhimani ◽  
Fardeen Bhimani ◽  
Preeti Singh
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Mechanical Axis ◽  
Computer Navigation ◽  
Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
P Value ◽  
Mechanical Alignment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Mean

Introduction. Malpositioning of the implant results in polyethylene wear and loosing of implant after total knee arthroplasty. Scanogram is often used for measurement of limb alignment. Computer navigation provides real time measurements and thus, the aim is to see any association pre- and postoperatively between coronal alignments measured on scanogram to computer navigation during total knee arthroplasty. Material and Methods. We prospectively gathered data of 200 patients with advanced degenerative symptomatic arthritis, who were consecutively selected for primary total knee arthroplasty with computer navigation. Every patient’s pre- and postoperative scanogram were compared to the intraoperative computer navigation findings. Results. The results show that the preoperative mean mechanical axis on navigation was 10.65° (SD ± 6.95) and on scanogram it was 10.38° (SD ± 6.89). On the other hand, the mean postoperative mechanical axis on navigation was 0.69° (SD ± 0.87) and on scanogram it was 2.73° (SD ± 2.10). Preoperatively, there was no significant difference (p value = 0.46) between the two. However, the postoperative outcomes suggest that there was a noteworthy difference, with no correlation between the mean Hip-Knee Ankle Axis (HKA) and intraoperative mechanical axis (p value <0.0001). Conclusion. Postoperative mechanical alignment values after total knee arthroplasty are lower on navigation than measured on standing full length hip to ankle scanogram.

scholarly journals Kinematic versus mechanical alignment for primary total knee arthroplasty with minimum 2 years follow-up: a systematic review

SICOT-J ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elliot Sappey-Marinier ◽  
Adrien Pauvert ◽  
Cécile Batailler ◽  
John Swan ◽  
Laurence Cheze ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Kinematic Alignment ◽  
Mechanical Alignment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Total Knee

Purpose: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to determine whether there are any clinical or radiological differences in mechanically aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) compared with kinematically aligned TKA. Methods: This study included retrospective cohort studies, prospective randomized controlled trials (PRCTs) and prospective cohort studies comparing clinical and radiological outcomes, and complications in TKA with kinematic alignment (KA) and mechanical alignment (MA). All studies had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Results: Five PRCTs published between 2014 and 2020 were included. These studies showed a low risk of bias and were of very high quality. We did not find a superiority of KA compared to MA technique for clinical and radiological outcomes, except in one study which showed a significant difference favoring KA between the two groups for all clinical scores. Conclusion: We found that KA in TKA achieved clinical and radiological results similar to those of MA. The complication rate was not increased for KA TKAs. Studies with longer follow-up and larger cohorts are required to prove any benefit of KA technique over MA technique.

scholarly journals Distribution of prostheses position after primary total knee arthroplasty on dominant and non-dominant sides

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZHAO Fengchao ◽  
LIU Lei ◽  
Zha Guochun ◽  
Yang Guanjie ◽  
Xu Shizhuang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Dominant Group ◽  
Total Operation Time ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Primary Total Knee

Abstract Background To investigate the changes of prosthesis position after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on the dominant and non-dominant sides. Methods A retrospective analysis was made of 132 patients (148 knees) who underwent primary TKA from December 2016 to December 2018 in our hospital. The patients were divided into dominant group (right side) and non-dominant group (left side) according to the position of the three right-handed surgeons. Total operation time, posterior distal femur angle (PDFA), posterior proximal tibia angle (PPTA), malposition rate of femoral prostheses in sagittal, postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) were compared between the two groups. Results The mean total operation time was in dominant group was 111.8(111.8±26.9) and in non-dominant group was 113.7(113.7±26.1) (P>0.05). Postoperative sagittal alignment, the mean PDFA was 90.2(90.2°±3.3°) in dominant group and 88.8(88.8°±3.6°) in non-dominant group (P<0.05). The mean PPTA was 84.8(84.8°±2.8°) in dominant group and 85.4(85.4°±3.7°) in non-dominant group (P>0.05). The incidence of malposition of sagittal femoral prosthesis in dominant group was 6/76 (7.9%) and that in non-dominant was 15/72 (20.8%). There was a significant difference between the two groups (χ2=5.083，P=0.024). Postoperative coronal alignment, the mean angle of components placement was 2.1°±4.2° for HKA, 88.7°±2.7° for mLDFA, 89.5°±2.7° for mMPTA in dominant group and 1.6°±4.1° for HKA, 89.0°±2.8° for mLDFA, 89.9°±2.7° for mMPTA in non-dominant group, respectively. There were no significant difference between the two groups (t=0.804 P=0.423, t=-0.564 P= 0.574, t=-1.011 P= 0.314). Conclusion Our study suggests that surgeon handedness is likely to be one of factors that affect the sagittal placement of femoral component. Orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of the potential problems and consider taking extra precautions to mitigate the risk before performing surgery.

Does Kinematic Alignment Improve Short-Term Functional Outcomes after Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared with Mechanical Alignment? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (01) ◽  
pp. 078-086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanhong Li ◽  
Yuliang Wang ◽  
Mingxuan Yang ◽  
Shuanke Wang
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Mechanical Axis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mechanical Alignment ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Total Knee

AbstractThis meta-analysis was conducted to study whether kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves short-term functional outcomes compared with mechanical alignment without changing the hip–knee–ankle angle. Prospective cohort studies were searched from electronic literature databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase (Ovid interface), and Cochrane Library (Ovid interface). Total 1,159 records were identified. Six trials involving 561 patients were eligible for data extraction and meta-analysis. The included studies recorded outcomes in the follow-up range from 6 to 34 months. Primary outcomes were to assess the functional outcomes in follow-up, and KA group achieved better performance on WOMAC score (mean difference [MD] = −18.82, 95% CI: −16.06 to −5.58), knee function score (MD = 7.23, 95% CI: 0.52–13.94), Oxford knee score (MD = 4.76, 95% CI: 0.40–9.12), and knee range of flexion (MD = 4.48, 95% CI: 2.09–6.86), whereas other parameters including Knee Society score, knee range of extension, VAS pain score, and the occurrence of the complications were without significant difference (p > 0.05). Second outcomes evaluated the perioperative clinic indexes. Our meta-analysis showed that KA group had a shorter time of operation (MD = −15.44, 95% CI: −27.47 to −3.71) and a longer walk distance before discharge (MD = 53.24, 95% CI: 21.32–85.15) when compared with the MA group, whereas the change in hemoglobin, incision length, knee range of flexion before discharge, and length of stays were without significant difference (p > 0.05). Third outcomes were used to analyze the alignment data. Our study showed that KA had larger angles of femoral component and mechanical axis of the femur (MD = −1.95,95% CI: −2.77 to −1.13), tibial component and mechanical axis of tibia (MD = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.43–2.70), anatomic knee angle (MD = −0.72, 95% CI: −1.33 to −0.11), and operative limb alignment (MD = −1.97, 95% CI: −2.50 to −1.45,) compared with the MA group, but the hip–knee–ankle angles between the two groups were similar. KA provided better functional outcomes and better flexion following short-term follow-up of TKA. However, longer-term follow-up and larger sample studies are needed to put into research in the future.

scholarly journals Comparison of blood loss between intra-articular and intra-venous administration of tranexamic acid in primary total knee arthroplasty

SICOT-J ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 20
Author(s):  
Muhammad Suhail Amin ◽  
Muhammad Khurram Habib ◽  
Aziz Ur Rehman
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Primary Total Knee

Objective: To compare the blood loss between intra-articular and intra-venous administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty. Design of study: It was a randomized controlled trial. Study duration and settings: This study was carried out at the Orthopedic Departments of Combined Military Hospital Lahore and Rawalpindi from Jan 2016 to March 2018. Methodology: Patients of both the genders were involved this study who had age in the rage of 40–80 years undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty for degenerative conditions like osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. These patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups. Patients in IA group received intra-articular tranexamic acid while those in IV group received intravenous tranexamic acid. From all the patients, a written signed consent was taken. Findings: Females were predominant with male-to-female ratio of 1:3.7. The mean age of the patients was 67.3 ± 8.2 years while the mean BMI was 30.9 ± 2.9 Kg/m2. Majority (n = 191, 95.5%) of the patients had osteoarthritis while remaining 9 (4.5%) patients had rheumatoid arthritis. There was no statistically significant difference between intra-articular and intra-venous administration of tranexamic acid in terms of mean post-operative hemoglobin (9.93 ± 1.14 vs. 9.87 ± 1.26 g/dL; p-value = 0.724), mean post-operative hematocrit (34.8 ± 1.66 vs. 34.73 ± 1.27%; p-value = 0.594), and mean fall in hemoglobin (2.27 ± 0.34 vs. 2.25 ± 0.30 g/dL; p-value = 0.587) and hematocrit (2.34 ± 0.94 vs. 2.46 ± 0.28%; p-value = 0.216). Conclusion: Intra-articular administration of tranexamic acid was found to be as effective and safe as intra-venous administration in reducing blood loss in primary total knee arthroplasty. Due to convenience, the use of intra-articular administration of tranexamic acid after primary TKA may be considered in future practice.

Isolated Liner Revision for Total Knee Arthroplasty Instability: A Road That Should Remain Less Taken

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason D. Tegethoff ◽  
Rafael Walker-Santiago ◽  
William M. Ralston ◽  
James A. Keeney
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Component ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
P Value ◽  
Surgical Morbidity ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Component Revision

AbstractIsolated polyethylene liner exchange (IPLE) is infrequently selected as a treatment approach for patients with primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prosthetic joint instability. Potential advantages of less immediate surgical morbidity, faster recovery, and lower procedural cost need to be measured against reoperation and re-revision risk. Few published studies have directly compared IPLE with combined tibial and femoral component revision to treat patients with primary TKA instability. After obtaining institutional review board (IRB) approval, we performed a retrospective comparison of 20 patients treated with IPLE and 126 patients treated with tibial and femoral component revisions at a single institution between 2011 and 2018. Patient demographic characteristics, medical comorbidities, time to initial revision TKA, and reoperation (90 days, <2 years, and >2 years) were assessed using paired Student's t-test or Fisher's exact test with a p-value <0.01 used to determine significance. Patients undergoing IPLE were more likely to undergo reoperation (60.0 vs. 17.5%, p = 0.001), component revision surgery (45.0 vs. 8.7%, p = 0.002), and component revision within 2 years (30.0 vs. 1.6%, p < 0.0001). Differences in 90-day reoperation (p = 0.14) and revision >2 years (p = 0.19) were not significant. Reoperation for instability (30.0 vs. 4.0%, p < 0.001) and infection (20.0 vs. 1.6%, p < 0.01) were both higher in the IPLE group. IPLE does not provide consistent benefits for patients undergoing TKA revision for instability. Considerations for lower immediate postoperative morbidity and cost need to be carefully measured against long-term consequences of reoperation, delayed component revision, and increased long-term costs of multiple surgical procedures. This is a level III, case–control study.

scholarly journals Bone Cement Solidifiliation Influence the Limb Alignment and Gap Balance during TKA

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongquan Shi ◽  
Xingquan Xu ◽  
Anyun Guo ◽  
Jin Dai ◽  
Zhihong Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Bone Cement ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Mechanical Axis ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Mechanical Alignment ◽  
Early Loosening ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Total Knee

Introduction. Mechanical alignment deviation after total knee arthroplasty is a major reason for early loosening of the prosthesis. Achieving optimum cement penetration during fixation of the femoral and tibial component is an essential step in performing a successful total knee arthroplasty. Bone cement is used to solidify the bone and prosthesis. Thickness imbalance of bone cement leads to the deviation of mechanical alignment. To estimate the influence of bone cement, a retrospective study was conducted.Materials and Methods. A total of 36 subjects were studied. All the TKA were performed following the standard surgical protocol for navigated surgery by medial approach with general anaesthesia. Prostheses were fixed by bone cement.Results. We compared the mechanical axis, flexion/extension, and gap balance before and after cementation. All the factors were different compared with those before and after cementation. Internal rotation was reached with statistical significance (P=0.03).Conclusion. Bone cement can influence the mechanical axis, flexion/extension, and gap balance. It also can prompt us to make a change when poor knee kinematics were detected before cementation.

scholarly journals COMPARISON OF HEMOSTASIS WITH TRANEXAMIC ACID IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 184-188
Author(s):  
OTÁVIO MONTOVANELLI MONTEIRO ◽  
RODRIGO TURRA PERRONE ◽  
FABRÍCIO NASCIMENTO ALMEIDA ◽  
CID PEREIRA DE MOURA JUNIOR ◽  
SAULO GOMES DE OLIVEIRA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Joint Surface ◽  
Thromboembolic Events ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Group 3

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the use of intravenous and topical tranexamic acid (TXA) in unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in relation to blood loss and complications inherent to the medication. Method: Three groups with 14 patients each were constituted, and all of them were operated using the same surgical technique. In Group 1, usual measures for bleeding control were performed. Group 2 patients received TXA topically on the joint surface. In Group 3, intravenous TXA was used. Hemoglobin (HB), hematocrit (HTC), platelets (PLAT), prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time and volume of blood drained observed 24 hours after arthroplasty were compared to the values of tests found before surgery. Results: There was a decrease in the concentration of HB, HTC and PLAT in all groups in relation to the preoperative, however without significant difference. Group 3 had a lower mean volume of drained blood than the other groups, with statistical significance. No adverse effects or thromboembolic events were observed in the groups that received TXA. Conclusion: This study showed superiority in the use of intravenous TXA in decreasing the volume of bleeding, without increasing the risk of thromboembolic events. Level of Evidence I, High quality randomized trial with statistically significant difference or no statistically significant difference but narrow confidence intervals.

Reliable outcomes and survivorship of primary total knee arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the knee

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (11) ◽  
pp. 1356-1361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian P. Chalmers ◽  
Kapil G. Mehrotra ◽  
Rafael J. Sierra ◽  
Mark W. Pagnano ◽  
Michael J. Taunton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Aseptic Loosening ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Primary Tkas ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Mean

Aims Knee osteonecrosis in advanced stages may lead to joint degeneration. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for osteonecrosis has traditionally been associated with suboptimal results. We analyzed outcomes of contemporary TKAs for osteonecrosis, with particular emphasis on: survivorship free from aseptic loosening, any revision, and any reoperation plus the clinical outcomes, complications, and radiological results. Patients and Methods In total, 156 patients undergoing 167 primary TKAs performed for osteonecrosis between 2004 and 2014 at a single institution were reviewed. The mean age at index TKA was 61 years (14 to 93) and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 30 kg/m2 (18 to 51) The mean follow-up was six years (2 to 12). A total of 110 TKAs (66%) were performed for primary osteonecrosis and 57 TKAs (34%) for secondary osteonecrosis. Overall, 15 TKAs (9%) had tibial stems, while 12 TKAs (7%) had femoral stems. Posterior-stabilized designs were used in 147 TKAs (88%) of TKAs. Bivariate Cox regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors for revision and reoperation. Results Survivorship free from aseptic loosening, any revision, and any reoperation at ten years was 97% (95% confidence interval (CI) 93 to 100), 93% (95% CI 85 to 100), and 82% (95% CI 69 to 93), respectively. No factors, including age, sex, BMI, primary versus secondary osteonecrosis, stem utilization, and constraint, were identified as risk factors for reoperation. Four TKAs (2%) underwent revision, most commonly for tibial aseptic loosening (n = 2). Excluding revisions and reoperations, there was a total of 11 complications (7%), with the most common being a manipulation under anaesthesia (six TKAs, 4%). Mean Knee Society Scores (Knee component) significantly improved from 57 (32 to 87) preoperatively to 91 (49 to 100) postoperatively (p < 0.001). No unrevised TKAs had complete radiolucent lines or radiological evidence of loosening. Conclusion Contemporary cemented TKAs with selective stem utilization for osteonecrosis resulted in durable survivorship, a low complication rate, and reliable improvement in clinical outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1356–1361.

scholarly journals Gap difference in navigated TKA: a measure of the imbalanced flexion-extension gap

SICOT-J ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zi-Yang Chia ◽  
Hee-Nee Pang ◽  
Mann-Hong Tan ◽  
Seng-Jin Yeo
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Social Functioning ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Computer Calculation ◽  
Bodily Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Mean

Introduction: The success of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) hinges on balanced flexion-extension gaps. This paper aims to evaluate the correlation between imbalanced gaps and clinical outcomes, and hence help quantify the imbalanced gap in navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Methods: We studied 195 knees with an average follow-up of two years. Flexion-extension gaps were obtained from computer calculation upon cementation of implants in both flexion (90°) and extension. The gap difference (GD) was defined as the measured difference between the gaps in flexion and extension. Results: At 2 years after surgery, the mean ROM in the balanced group, with GD less than or equal to 2 mm, was 115.1° ± 16.6° and the mean ROM in the imbalanced group was 116.7° ± 12.1°. This was not statistically significant with p-value 0.589. Balanced flexion-extension gaps also did not show significant difference in terms of mechanical alignment, with 0.29 ± 0.89 in the balanced group at 2 years, and 0.65 ± 1.51 in the imbalanced group with p-value 0.123. Balanced gaps however, were associated with improved outcomes in terms of physical functioning, bodily pain, social functioning, Oxford and Knee scores at 6 months and improved social functioning scores at 2 years. Conclusions: Computer navigation is a useful tool for assessing the gap balance in TKA. Balanced flexion-extension gaps, with gap differences of less than or equal to 2 mm, is associated with improved clinical outcomes at 6 months.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document